Machine Safety Acceptable Risk, Tolerable Risk, 5 Comments


Machine Safety - to understand machine safety, you have to understand the concepts of “acceptable” versus “tolerable” risk.

First, “tolerable risk” is the term used for the past several years referring to a level of residual risk for a given hazard after applying risk reduction measures. ANSI B11.1- 2009, Safety Requirements for Mechanical Power Presses, defines tolerable risk in clause 3.90.1 “Risk that is accepted for a given task (hazardous situation) or hazard”. In my opinion a more current term has come to life replacing tolerable risk as more focus continues to be directed at integrating the safety mindset into all phases of a machine life cycle.

“Acceptable risk” is the new term that is beginning to appear in many updated standards and which in my opinion more clearly represents the implied intent of both evaluation and mitigation. The assumption is that risk can never truly be totally eliminated from a hazard but that every risk should be evaluated for risk reductions measures and mitigated to the smallest amount possible.

Therefore, these updated standards are defining acceptable risk as the level at which further risk reduction will not result in significant reduction in risk or that additional expenditure of resources will not result in significant advances towards increased safety.

So, how much does this discussion matter? Isn’t the whole bottom line of the required risk analysis process really about consciously identifying hazards and reducing their risk of occupational injuries, illnesses, and fatalities? If your first response to this question is no - I strongly urge you to take anyone’s course on “Risk Assessment - 101″. Of course the answer is - YES! So, let’s stop hiding behind building columns and do what’s right for our fellow mankind.

Posted by J.B. Titus on October 12, 2009


January 16, 2010

In response to: Machine Safety Acceptable RiskFranco Tomei commented:


It appears from some of the questions that the writer has focused on a different deficition of risk that what is stated in the articel as follows;

“Definition (from article) acceptable risk as the level at which further risk reduction will not result in significant reduction in risk or that additional expenditure of resources will not result in significant advances towards increased safety”.

There is some objectivity in the definition and it is not simply up to the employer or any other individual. The requirements of the definition must be met otherwise the whole thing falls apart.

December 2, 2009

In response to: Machine Safety Acceptable RiskJB commented:

Silvio - here in the US you can find several standards mentioning acceptable risk. To mention a few - NFPA 79, 2007, ANSI B11.TR7, 2007, ANSI-PMMI 155.1, ANSI B11.1, 2009, and an article at Control Engineering

December 2, 2009

In response to: Machine Safety Acceptable RiskSilvio Melo commented:


Where can I find a Standard mentioning this subject?

October 21, 2009

In response to: Machine Safety Acceptable RiskJB commented:


The owner of a business in the US must provide a safe work place. Therefore, it can be argued that he is the first one to answer “what is acceptable?”. He may tell the engineer that his solution for a safety circuit is acceptable at Cat. 2 because he plans to mitigate the residual safety hazard further via warning signs, operator training, and steel guards.

October 21, 2009

In response to: Machine Safety Acceptable RiskStan commented:


That begs the question, “What is acceptable?” All the standards in the world can not fully answer that. What is acceptable to 1 is not to another. That is what makes “what is” so hard.

The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
Pipe fabrication and IIoT; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
The future of electrical safety; Four keys to RPM success; Picking the right weld fume option
A new approach to the Skills Gap; Community colleges may hold the key for manufacturing; 2017 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Control room technology innovation; Practical approaches to corrosion protection; Pipeline regulator revises quality programs
The cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Infrastructure for natural gas expansion; Artificial lift methods; Disruptive technology and fugitive gas emissions
Power system design for high-performance buildings; mitigating arc flash hazards
VFDs improving motion control applications; Powering automation and IIoT wirelessly; Connecting the dots
Natural gas engines; New applications for fuel cells; Large engines become more efficient; Extending boiler life

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me