ERP risks that can't be ignored

Being proactive in enterprise resource planning (ERP) risk management may spell the difference between a successful ERP overhaul, and an ERP disaster.


Photo by Shawn Appel on UnsplashEnterprise resource planning (ERP) risks are inherent. In many cases, risk is commensurate with the scale of the ERP project. The more areas of the business the ERP system will touch, the greater the likelihood of associated risk.

This should come as no surprise to the ERP project team heading into active evaluation, selection and ERP implementation.

Unlike a typical project team that might live through an ERP project once or twice a career, Ultra’s ERP consultants have successfully guided hundreds of manufacturers and distributors through the process of enterprise initiatives and offer a unique perspective on ERP risks that we consider a best practice in the industry.

Awareness of ERP risks

Gaining an awareness of ERP risks and striving to embrace a proactive risk management stance will help teams take steps to address serious project and business issues in the future. The six risk categories encountered most frequently include:

1. Business priorities and leadership: These risks commonly arise due to changing business and leadership dynamics of the project. As an example, are competing priorities likely to necessitate resource reallocation? Will key team members and resources be pulled into another high priority enterprise-wide project? Can the organization handle existing workloads and operations without affecting the ERP project? These threats stemming from project organization, resource allocation, workload, and competing priorities must be addressed and require appropriate mitigation activities.

2. Financial budget and value realization: Many projects undertaken by manufacturing and distribution organizations carry risk related to the budget or financial expectations of the project. Risk typically stems from a lack of comprehensive scoping and budgeting for the project; insufficient assessments of tangible benefits and measurable targets that define investment expectations; changes in the project budget allocation; or unanticipated financial forecast changes. This risk category impacts confidence in realizing the business case and value priority of the project.

3. Project scope and timeline: Here's where that dreaded "scope creep" comes into play. ERP risk in this area comes from unexpected project scope changes such as unplanned business or process requirements; lack of appropriate scope details leading to assumptions and misunderstandings; or software modules/functionality that don't deliver to the expectation and therefore require additional change, development, due-diligence, and more time. Changes to the original work plan including extensions or reductions of the project timeline also increase risk for project success.

4. Resource staffing and competencies: Similar to the first category of business risk, these risks involve project team staffing, resource allocations, competing priorities, individual competencies, and organizational stability. For example, consider any potential changes in executive leadership that might negatively impact project sponsorship.

5. Change and cultural adoption: Successful adoption of change across the enterprise requires mature change management techniques, principles, and experience. This area of risk relates to general acceptance or resistance to change, individual adoption of the project activities or outcomes, and just as important—the overall readiness of each functional area to move forward in executing the day-to-day expectations of the business with confidence, efficiency, and success.

6. Process capability and future state expectations: It's important to proactively assess risk associated with the process expectations as well as what the capability of those processes are.

Understanding these expectations is key to ensuring the project team delivers the results in terms of anticipated business efficiencies, productivity goals, and value targets.

Charlie Schloff is a partner and chief innovation officer for Ultra Consultants, a CFE Media content partner. This article originally appeared on Ultra Consultants' blog.

The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2017 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
SCCR, 2018 Maintenance study, and VFDs in a washdown environment.
Welding ergonomics, 2017 Salary Survey, and surge protection
2017 Top Plant winner, Best practices, Plant Engineering at 70, Top 10 stories of 2017
Product of the Year winners, Pattern recognition, Engineering analytics, Revitalize older pump installations
Control room technology innovation; Practical approaches to corrosion protection; Pipeline regulator revises quality programs
The cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Setting internal automation standards
Knowing how and when to use parallel generators
PID controllers, Solar-powered SCADA, Using 80 GHz radar sensors

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me