Are wireless fire alarms right for your project?

Fire protection engineers should explore the costs, benefits, history, technology, and code compliance aspects of low-power radio wireless fire alarm systems and wireless smoke alarms.


Learning objectives

1. Understand the basics of wireless fire alarm systems.

2. Learn to calculate the cost of wired versus wireless systems.

3. Become familiar with NFPA 72. 

Wireless fire alarms are often confused with wired fire alarm systems so often, we forget that it is “wireless” and not “wire-free.” Understanding this basic difference will help you calculate the savings associated with a wireless fire alarm system. In a wireless application, the notification devices currently must be wired to the wirelessly controlled and supervised notification appliance circuits (NAC) booster panels, thus reducing the associated conduit/cabling costs by locating horn/strobes very close to the wireless NAC/booster panels.

Each application, wireless or hardwired, requires a careful study to determine the suitability and consider the associated costs. It is never always one or the other; each application has its associated costs versus savings.

Wireless fire alarm systems are varied in their cost savings. In difficult applications where you cannot install cable (or where you can install only limited amounts of cable), you will see major labor cost savings. This might include applications that would require a significant amount of exposed conduit, painting, patching, and texturing to bring the premises back to pre-installation conditions (typical of retrofit-type applications). The savings become even greater in applications where you’d have to trench a site and incur the costs associated with concrete/asphalt cutting, trenching, backfilling, compressing, and resurfacing to original conditions. In these applications, wireless is an easy choice due to its instant savings and speed of installation. Particularly where asbestos or lead paint are present, or in historic buildings, wireless can reduce hazardous conditions exposure and improve the aesthetic appeal of historic properties.

In other applications, there is significant savings when speed of installation is important to the client. In retrofit applications such as a hotel, motel, or condo, you can install the detection devices faster than the maid can clean the room. Newer technology allows “tandem” smoke operation in residential properties that have multiple smoke detectors in a common apartment, condo, or large hotel room. A wireless system for a 100-room property with a single building site can be installed in 7 to 10 days with testing. For a hardwired fire alarm application, installation could take upward of 4 to 6 weeks (assuming a two-man installation team). Of course, when an active fire alarm system is not in place, there is even more savings if you factor in the wasted (nonrecoverable) labor expense of fire watch during a retrofit (assuming a hardwired installation/retrofit versus a wireless application). Five days of fire watch is standard in wireless systems; 30 days of fire watch is typical in hardwired systems.

NFPA 72: National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, requires fire alarm products to be listed for the intended purpose/applications. Listing/approving organization/agencies such as the California State Fire Marshal, New York Fire Department, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), UL, and FM Global are important assurances that the wireless product you choose is the caliber and offers the reliability you demand as a specifying engineer.

Figure 1: Wireless fire alarm control panel and devices can be more expensive while installation is less expensive. Courtesy: Jim AvanzinoThe larger the systems, the more cost-effective a wireless fire alarm system can become. This is because you do not necessarily need data gathering panels, zone expanders, and loop cards, which are typical of a larger hardwired system. In the wireless fire alarm arena, some wireless fire alarm panels out of the box can handle 1000+ detection devices without the need to ever expand the panel. Wireless fire alarms require no terminal boards/loop cards to terminate wires to; thus the client realizes the cost savings of no conduit, no wire, no wire pull, no trim, no terminations, and no troubleshooting associated with grounds, ground faults, polarity issues, opens, and so on. In areas of the country that are lightning-prone, wireless systems can all but eliminate the associated lightning damage that can cause havoc to wired fire alarm systems. Wireless fire alarm materials (Figure 1) are usually more expensive, and the installation labor is typically less expensive.


Common wireless technologies include radio frequency, optical and sonic with radio frequency being employed in fire alarm systems. Various frequencies and modulation types are used in radio frequency communications. All are regulated by the FCC. Fire systems using low-power radio frequency communications operate at levels below the threshold that requires FCC licensing. To transmit informative signals, various methods of modulation are used: frequency modulation, amplitude modulation, phase shifting, amplitude shifting, frequency spreading (spread spectrum), ultra-wideband modulation, and combinations of these.

Spread spectrum is commonly used for communications in wireless fire alarm systems as it is more immune to noise and interference and provides for more secure communications. Within spread spectrum, variations exist for frequency hopping, direct sequencing, time hopping, and chirp methodologies. Frequency hopping spread spectrum modulation shifts a carrier signal among many frequency channels in a pseudo-random sequence known to both transmitter and receiver. Once synced, the transmitter and receiver communicate in a secure, robust pathway. The frequency hopping spread spectrum radio frequency (RF) protocol used by wireless fire alarm system manufacturers is also the chosen RF technology for the U.S. military, NASA, and other high-security organizations requiring the most secure and reliable RF protocol.

Designers and installers of wireless systems perform an RF survey as part of their pre-installation phase. These surveys are used to determine the location of repeaters to account for building features and other sources of RF interference to ensure that the pathways exist for the system to be installed. If interference is found, then repeaters can be relocated or added to compensate for the attenuated signal.

Code compliance

Wireless fire alarm systems and code compliance are easy to achieve once you understand the applicable code requirements. Specific requirements have been in NFPA 72 and its predecessor standards since 1987; the current standard is NFPA 72-2013. Wireless fire alarm systems are referred to as low-power radio (wireless) fire alarm systems in this code. These systems are required to comply with all of the requirements that wired fire alarm systems comply with, except as modified by circuits and pathway designations and special requirements found in NFPA 72.

Circuits and pathways

Circuits and pathways as used in NFPA 72 are circuits, conductors, optic fibers, radio carriers, or other means connecting two or more locations. These interconnections between two or more locations are achieved through a pathway. The performance and survivability characteristics of pathways are outlined in Chapter 12 of NFPA 72.

Figure 2: This shows a redundant pathway available in some wireless fire alarm systems. Courtesy: Lynn NielsonThe pathway classification describes performance characteristics and capabilities to continue to operate during abnormal conditions. Various fault conditions are used as the criteria to establish a pathway designation and level of performance. Pathways are designated as Class A, B, C, D, E, or X. The pathway designations recognize that wireless fire alarm system pathways are not subject to the ground faults and open circuits like wired circuits are. Figure 2 shows an example of a redundant pathway available in some wireless fire alarm systems.

Some of the class designations that could be used for wireless systems include Class A, C, E, and X. Class A pathways are not disabled due to a ground fault or short circuits. Class C pathways include wireless LAN systems where end-to-end communication is verified but not the integrity of the individual pathway. Class E pathways are not monitored for integrity but may include monitoring by ability to use the function controlled at the end of the pathway. Class X pathways include a redundant path or the ability to operate past a single open or short circuit—conditions that affect the path are detected and annunciated. The significance of this as it relates to wireless fire alarm systems is that once the pathway classification is designated, then the fault tolerance is known.

It should be noted that changes for the NFPA 72-2013 include changes to pathway classifications that will impact wireless radio fire alarm systems. Specifically, clarification was added in the form of exceptions to the pathway classifications designating when requirements do not apply to nonconductive pathways (e.g., wireless or fiber).

Some of the special requirements found in NFPA 72 for wireless fire alarm systems include:

  • Listing
  • Power supply
  • Alarm signals
  • Monitoring for integrity
  • Output signals for receiver/control
  • Acceptance testing.

<< First < Previous Page 1 Page 2 Next > Last >>

The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2017 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
Welding ergonomics, 2017 Salary Survey, and surge protection
2017 Top Plant winner, Best practices, Plant Engineering at 70, Top 10 stories of 2017
Pipe fabrication and IIoT; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
Product of the Year winners, Pattern recognition, Engineering analytics, Revitalize older pump installations
Control room technology innovation; Practical approaches to corrosion protection; Pipeline regulator revises quality programs
The cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Setting internal automation standards
Knowing how and when to use parallel generators
PID controllers, Solar-powered SCADA, Using 80 GHz radar sensors

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me