Rittal: Modular industrial enclosures cost less considering operating costs

Modular industrial enclosures save money over unibody systems for system integrators and end users when accounting for all costs, according to a Rittal whitepaper.

06/04/2009


Rittal TS8 modular enclosures

Rittal TS8 modular enclosure, designed for industrial applications has a 16- fold tubular frame and multi-level mounting. The frame can hold weight loads up to 1,500 lbs on the mounting panel. The 25 mm hole pattern allows components and accessories to be mounted by height, width and depth, providing up to 30% more available space than traditional NEMA-style enclosures of equal dimension. Symmetrical frame design makes suiting in a row, into a corner or even back-to-back simple. Kits are available where separation between the floor and the enclosure are necessary due to environmental hazards or cable conduit installation and access concerns.

Modular freestanding enclosures offer a number of key advantages when compared to traditional unibody enclosures, according to “Rittal White Paper 103: The Practical Benefits of Modular Industrial Enclosures.”
Many times, attributes of modular designs are overlooked, either out of a false perception of increased enclosure costs, reluctance to change, or a simple lack of awareness to the possible benefits of modular solutions, says Nathan Xavier, a Rittal Corp. applications engineer.
Integrators and end users can benefit from a clearer understanding of the benefits and savings offered by modular enclosures over a system's lifespan. A lifespan cost analysis factors in common use and operating costs such as maintenance, modifications, and expansions associated with typical industrial applications, Xavier says.
Most people are familiar with the concept of return on investment (ROI). Xavier says the true cost of an enclosure over its useful live can be represented similarly as:
Acquisition Cost + Use Costs + Operating Costs = True Cost.

Here are some details.
-Acquisition costs : Control panel shops, system integrators and end users pay the cost of acquiring the hardware.
-Use costs : Panel shops and system integrators often are more concerned with use costs, which include labor and use of floor space during integration. Modifications, such as human-machine interface (HMI) components that require changes to the door, are use costs.

Rittal resources: Energy efficient climate control for enclosures

Enclosures can influence energy efficiency in industrial climate control applications. System integrators and end users can maximize energy efficiency by selecting the proper type and size of enclosure, optimizing panel layout, and performing regular maintenance, according to the Rittal whitepaper.

Because sophisticated, sensitive electronics and drives are the backbone of many industrial applications, and this equipment often is placed inside enclosures to protect it from rugged environments. Surrounding temperatures and other ambient conditions may require that the enclosures be cooled to ensure proper component performance of installed components and avoid heat-related downtime.

Rittal White Paper 303: Energy Efficient Enclosure Climate Control” (395 KB PDF) discusses tips for cooling industrial enclosures that Rittal says can:
- Reduce energy consumption;
- Save money by creating energy efficient climate control solutions;
- Select products of the correct type and cooling output;
- Optimize panel design, enclosure and climate control placement; and
- Ease maintenance.

Traditional enclosure doors with piano hinges can take up to 30 minutes to remove. Doors of a modular enclosure are attached by multi-point, captive hinges and can be removed in as little as 30 seconds (over 98% faster than piano-hinged doors) and taken to a separate location for modification, allowing simultaneous work on cutouts, increasing productivity. Also enclosure sidewalls and roofs can be removed for adding fans, heat exchangers, or air conditioners.
Creating cut outs with modular enclosures can be easier, says Xavier, because the strength of the enclosure comes from the frame rather than skin, so thinner gauge steel may be used. Thinner steel also results in weight savings of 75-175 lbs. for single door and 300 lbs. for double door configurations when compared to unibody equivalents.
-Operating costs : End users take the largest share of true costs from operating costs: labor for maintenance, lost productivity due to downtime, and costs incurred during expansion. Modular enclosures can substantially reduce all these costs. Flexibility of modular enclosures makes them easier to maintain and limits users’ exposure to unplanned downtime, allowing removal of doors, walls, and roofs within minutes, thus easier access to installed equipment. Also, mounting panels easily slide out of the front of modular enclosures, without time-consuming enclosure staging.
In the event of enclosure damage, a modular enclosure surface (sidewall, door or roof) can be replaced; unibody cabinets do not provide this flexibility. If expansion is needed, equipment needs to be removed and reinstalled in a larger enclosure. Modular enclosures may add partial mounting panels, chassis bars, or 19-in. rails. These are standard accessories for most modular enclosures that easily integrate into an existing cabinet or allow joining another enclosure to it when needed.
A unibody cabinet might seem to be more cost effective at first, but once the use and operations costs are factored into the equation, a unibody solution may prove to be cost-prohibitive, Xavier says. Learn more in “ Rittal White Paper 103: The Practical Benefits of Modular Industrial Enclosures ” (PDF).
Control Engineering offers other information on enclosures to improve NEMA designs, enclose wireless equipment, and keep cabinets coo l. See also

tips for control panel design and saving space

.
- Edited by Mark T. Hoske , editor in chief, Control Engineering www.controleng.com

Register here to select your choice of free eNewsletters.





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Bring focus to PLC programming: 5 things to avoid in putting your system together; Managing the DCS upgrade; PLM upgrade: a step-by-step approach
Balancing the bagging triangle; PID tuning improves process efficiency; Standardizing control room HMIs
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.