Overall Labor Effectiveness: Extending the principles of OEE to the workforce

Overall Labor Effectiveness (OLE) is a new key performance indicator that measures the cumulative effect of availability, performance, and quality—but for individuals or teams of people. The ability to measure the interdependency of these attributes is especially important in the workforce. Focused improvement on any one workforce metric, such as utilization—without considering other consequences like performance or quality—can have unintended consequences elsewhere in the plant.


OEE measures the cumulative effect of availability, performance and quality of a machine, providing insight to
Overall Labor Effectiveness (OLE) is a new key performance indicator that measures the cumulative effect of availability, performance, and quality—but for individuals or teams of people. The ability to measure the interdependency of these attributes is especially important in the workforce. The workforce, potentially the most flexible of all manufacturing resources,s all impact a manufacturer’s ability to leverage the rest of its plant. And focused improvement on any one workforce metric— such as utilization—without considering other consequences like performance or quality can have unintended consequences elsewhere in the plant.
OLE expands on the ideas of OEE by quantifying, diagnosing, and predicting not only the performance of the workforce and its influence on production, but the connection between the employees and the resources needed to expand production. OLE also is similarll in one place.
Breaking down OLE: How to measure workforce performance
The OLE equation is the sum of three workforce factors on productive output: availability, performance, and quality. Here is a summary of how these factors are determined.
Employee absenteeism is major factor in determining and meeting production benchmarks. Excused and unexcused absences, illness, and other issues of availability can determine whether a factory’s workforce and equipment are being properly utilized.
Scheduling the right employees at the right time—every time—also impacts production levels. Factories with specialized equipment often need employees with special certifications that are highly skilled, and can operate the machines at different times.
Indirect time with material delays, shift changeover, idle time, and machine downtime also contribute to a breakdown in the production process.
Analyzing these factors can help manufacturers develop attendance, leave, and absence management policies, in addition to scheduling deliveries of materials and products to keep the production chain moving. Examining OLE data may prompt a manufacturer to hire temporary help to account for seasonal or unpredictable demand—or schedule proper lead time for the arrival of materials so workers don’t leave their stations to obtain the materials themselves.
How long it takes for a manufacturer to produce and deliver product
An example of the performance component can be something as simple as a lack of technicians available to set up equipment for the following day’s production, or an employee that hasn’t been trained to operate a specific machine.
The quality component of OLE comes into play if employees are following instructions and processes, and using tools properly. By establishing the right output levels, supervisors can focus attention on producing a quality product, while avoiding high levels of rework and waste.
To link
OLE: the results
The ability of OLE to show the cause and effect of workforce factors in relation to profitability is the key result. OLE has the ability not only to determine workforce performance through availability, performance, and quality; but it also shows how changes made to improve one area could negatively impact another. An example could be a policy where one area of production receives incentive pay for creating more output. The result overloads the equipment, causing it to be replaced and stopping production altogether.
While all three categories are critical, availability is one area where manufacturers with in-place workforces can leverage to consistently provide and schedule the right mix of employees to enhance the number of productive workforce hours.
OLE shows how investments in training, root cause insights, and predictive measures with the workforce can increase profits. By building on the OEE model, OLE
Gregg Gordon is global practice leader for manufacturing, with Kronos, Inc ., a supplier of workforce management solutions.

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.