Keys to achieving high accuracy and reliability in temperature measurement

The final result of your temperature measurement will depend on the interaction of all the devices and connections between the sensor and control system.


Order a free copy of the Engineer’s Guide to Industrial Temperature Measurement at Courtesy: Emerson Process ManagementTemperature is the most widely measured variable in process industries and is often a critical factor in industrial processing. If a temperature measurement is not accurate, repeatable, and reliable for any reason, it can have a detrimental effect on such things as process efficiency, energy consumption, product quality, and possibly process safety.

Even a small measurement error can be disruptive or very costly in some processes. Pharmaceutical processing is an example where an inaccurate temperature measurement might ruin a batch of product worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. Another example is in a safety loop where poor performance could be costly, deadly, or both. An example might be a process that can go exothermic and possibly explode if temperature is not measured and controlled accurately. These examples emphasize that each measurement system needs to be evaluated carefully and engineered to satisfy the requirements of the process.

Links in the measurement chain

Measurements are typically made using a sensor, usually a TC (thermocouple) or an RTD (resistance temperature detector), and a signal conditioning circuit (either a transmitter or a channel of an input card to a DCS or PLC) to amplify the sensor’s low level (ohm or mV) signal to a more robust 4-20 mA current signal. These components, when combined with a field connection head and thermowell, are referred to as a temperature measurement system or assembly. Articles in this series have considered these individually, but now it’s important to consider the larger integration.

Systems are available to meet a variety of measurement accuracy and stability requirements. Some applications just look at trends, and absolute accuracy is not very important. On the other hand, others may have huge financial impact due to temperature measurement errors. Examples include off-spec production that may require reprocessing, a nuisance process shut down requiring an expensive process restart, reduced production rates, and frequent recalibration costs.

As an insight, the accuracy potential of a high-accuracy system is orders of magnitude more accurate than a loosely designed system. Over- or under-design of your system could be a very expensive oversight.

Determine system requirements

To the new or inexperienced engineer it may seem like a daunting task to select the proper temperature measurement system for an application. To design a reliable temperature measurement system, a series of questions needs to be answered to understand the application thoroughly. As a result of this, the best choice of system components can be made including the thermowell, sensor, and signal conditioning device. Performance requirements of the measurement must also be determined. Operating conditions during start-up, steady-state, and potential abnormal conditions must all be considered.

As with any task, a logical and methodical approach usually begins with understanding the performance and physical requirements of the measurement application:

  • Review process P&IDs
  • Compare diagrams to the actual installation
  • Evaluate possible mounting locations
  • Consult with process, mechanical, and environmental engineers during the component selection, and
  • Plan scope and schedule with project managers.

This kind of method will usually lead to the best path to follow for a well-engineered solution.

Identify measurement performance factors

Figure 1: Accuracy of a temperature measurement system is the degree of closeness of the measurement of a temperature to that temperature’s actual (true) value. Repeatability, is the degree to which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions show thTemperature measurement system performance is influenced by a number of factors in reporting process temperature measurements. The most significant of these are defined and explained below.

Accuracy of a temperature measurement system is the degree of closeness of the measurement of a temperature to that temperature's actual (true) value.

Repeatability of a measurement system, also called precision, is the degree to which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions show the same results. As an example, an instrument could present the same value for temperature every time (under the same measurement conditions), but the value is offset from the correct value. This is repeatable but not accurate. An ideal measurement is both accurate and repeatable (Figure 1).

Stability refers to the transmitter’s ability to avoid drift in order to maintain accuracy over time. It is related to the sensor’s measurement signal, which can be influenced by humidity and prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures. Stability is maintained by using reference elements in the transmitter, against which the sensor input is compared. The leading transmitter manufacturers, to improve accuracy and stability, fully characterize every transmitter over its entire temperature range to compensate for the temperature-dependency of the digital-to-analog converter (D/A) and the analog-to-digital converter (A/D).

Stability of a transmitter is often stated in terms of percent of the reading or the expected maximum change in measured temperature in degrees C or F over a specified amount of time for each sensor type. Data is typically given in year intervals such as one, two, or five years. Typical examples from a high-end transmitter are:

  • RTDs: ± 0.25% of reading, or ± 0.25 °C (0.45 °F) for five years, whichever is greater.
  • TCs: ± 0.5% of reading, or ± 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) for five years, whichever is greater.

Figure 2: One way to quantify the stack-up of errors is to use a total probable error (TPE) calculation. This analyzes the probable error of the transmitter and sensor system, based on anticipated installation conditions. Courtesy: Emerson Process ManagemThe stability specifications here refer to the transmitter performance and do not include the sensor itself. A well-made RTD is generally considered to be highly stable and will not degrade significantly over time. However, even a well-made TC will degrade measurably over time and much more quickly at high temperatures.

The critical lesson from all this discussion is that your design must recognize the performance of the entire measurement system, not just the transmitter or sensor. One way to quantify the stack-up of errors is to use a total probable error (TPE) calculation. This analyzes the probable error of the transmitter and sensor system, based on anticipated installation conditions. The components of this calculation include the root sum square of the transmitter and sensor accuracy effects (Figure 2).

Durability and reliability create confidence

It is reasonable to assume that a durable device or system will be reliable. You can depend on it to perform its intended function. Just as you would expect a durable battery in your car to reliably start the engine and run the accessories under all reasonable conditions, you would expect a durable temperature measurement system to perform under its specified conditions. Confidence is built upon a history of reliable performance.

In designing a temperature measurement system, each component should be selected to provide the reliability demanded of an application. For example, if dealing with a high-precision measurement requirement, you would not select a sensor that has an excessive drift expectation. If your environment is electrically noisy, you would not use a transmitter that did not offer intelligent filtering capability. Likewise, in a high-velocity flow application, you would not select a thermowell without performing wake frequency calculations. The common element is that you must understand the process to know what the most critical requirements are.

<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.