Designing high-performance buildings using 189.1

ASHRAE Standard 189.1 sets the standard for the total building sustainability package.


Industry standards set by ASHRAE and Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) have been integrated into the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) LEED baseline references since the original development of the LEED rating system.

In the 15 years since the USGBC introduced the pilot version of the LEED rating system, these three organizations have continuously worked together to keep the standards moving in the direction of performance and efficiency. At the same time, technology, design, and construction have evolved in response to these changes. 

In 2009, when ASHRAE, IES, and USGBC introduced Standard 189.1: Standard for the Design of High-Performance Green Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, it was a significant step, marking the first time that high-performance green building characteristics had been developed as code-enforceable language. ASHRAE has since released Standard 189.1-2011, which supersedes the original version and is listed as an alternative compliance path in the 2012 International Green Construction Code (IgCC). 

Unless a jurisdiction in which you regularly engineer and design buildings has adopted or is considering adopting Standard 189.1 or IgCC as part of its code requirements for permit and occupancy, Standard 189.1 may not have an impact on your current projects. Regardless, the fact that it is now an option for jurisdictions to consider makes it important for building design industry professionals to have a basic understanding of what it entails. It is equally important to monitor the code adoption plans and procedures of the jurisdictions where you provide service to make sure you have the chance to review and comment on proposed changes.

As a standard, 189.1-2011 provides guidelines and minimum requirements for the design of high-performance green buildings except low-rise residential buildings. For the purposes of this overview, the standard will be reviewed in its native form of ASHRAE Standard 189.1.   

It is important to remember that compared to ASHRAE Standard 90.1, 189.1 covers many aspects of construction beyond energy use. Standard 189.1 includes provisions for site sustainability, water efficiency, indoor environmental quality, materials and resources, and commissioning in addition to energy use. As jurisdictions begin to adopt 189.1 either directly or through the IgCC, these sections will have to be considered against existing regional agencies, departments, and regulations. For example, most jurisdictions have zoning laws on the books that may contradict the site development requirements of 189.1. 

Standard 189.1 is divided into 11 sections and is supported by nine appendices. Sections one through four cover the purpose, scope, definitions of key terms, and administration of the standard; Section 11 contains a listing of all other standards referenced in the document, detailing the location of the reference and its responsible governing body. 

If you have worked with LEED, the remaining sections are broken into categories that will look familiar: Site Sustainability, Water Use Efficiency, Energy Efficiency, Indoor Environmental Quality, Impact on Atmosphere, Materials and Resources, and Construction Plans for Operation. 

Each section has a collection of mandatory provisions that must be met in order to comply, and with the exception of Construction and Plans for Operation, each section offers both prescriptive and performance options for compliance. Construction and Plans for Operation includes only mandatory provisions.

Section 5 - Site Sustainability: This section covers preferred building sites (greenfield versus brownfield), roofs and site hardscape, light pollution, and plant species located on the project site with the intent of improving site selection and development, minimizing heat island impact, and reducing light pollution. 

Section 6 - Water Use Reduction: All site and building-related potable and non-potable water consumption, including outdoor water use for irrigation and irrigation system design and controls, is covered in this section. Maximum allowable flow rates are provided for various types of plumbing fixtures. In addition, water-consuming appliances, mechanical systems, medical systems, and roof irrigation are addressed. 

Section 7 - Energy Efficiency: This section outlines requirements for building energy efficiency, on-site renewable energy systems, and energy monitoring, and largely defers to the requirements of ASHRAE Standard 90.1. Provisions that go beyond the performance requirements of 90.1 include exterior wall and roof performance; fenestration performance, area, and orientation; HVAC system efficiency; and lighting power density. In addition to the systems covered by Standard 90.1, this section includes requirements for energy consumption metering, provisions for on-site renewable energy, and horizontal and vertical projections on the exterior. When using the performance option, an energy cost comparison alone is not allowed. The engineer must also demonstrate that the CO2 produced by operating the model building will not exceed that of a baseline model. 

Section 8 - Indoor Environmental Quality: In this section, you will find requirements for eliminating environmental tobacco smoke, preventing particulate contamination from entering the building (through walk-off mats and mechanical filtration), monitoring ventilation rates, reducing material volatile organic compound (VOC) levels, and daylighting provisions. The section also contains acoustical control requirements that focus on limiting sound transmission between different areas. The first acoustical control requires sound attenuation between the inside of the building and the outdoors when located near high-noise sources (e.g., expressways and airports). This is mandated in the form of wall, roof, and fenestration sound transmission class (STC) ratings. Interior sound (between spaces) is controlled through STC-rated partitions between dwelling units, and between assembly areas, such as conference rooms, and other use areas.

Section 9 - Impact on the Atmosphere, Materials, and Resources: Provisions for the handling of materials range from sourcing (location, biobased, and wood certification) to end of life (waste diversion, recycling, and total waste amount for a construction project). Ozone-depleting characteristics of components such as refrigerants are addressed in this section. As an alternative to the prescriptive path for materials, a lifecycle assessment (LCA) can be performed comparing at least two alternative constructions covering the material components addressed by the prescriptive path and compliant with Sections 6, 7, and 8 and the mandatory requirements of Section 9. Performing an LCA for Atmosphere, Materials, and Resources is analogous to performing an energy model for the building energy efficiency. That is, the LCA provides designers with more freedom to exceed the performance requirements of the standard by not being limited to the prescriptive path. In the LCA, the accepted alternative must demonstrate a 5% improvement over the prescriptive building alternate in at least two of the impact categories: land use, resource use, climate change, ozone layer depletion, human health effects, ecotoxicity, smog, acidification, and eutrophication. The section references ISO Standard 14044 for performing the LCA. 

Section 10 - Construction and Plans for Operation: All provisions listed in this section are mandatory. Construction primarily covers construction activities and the commissioning effort and includes controlling moisture on the construction site, limiting vehicle idling, erosion and sediment control, and indoor air quality control. The commissioning portion outlines the commissioning process and identifies what systems must be commissioned. Plans for Operation tackles post-occupancy activities required to keep the building operating as it was designed throughout the building life. There are six main systems that are identified to be commissioned: mechanical systems, lighting systems, fenestration control systems (automatic shades and dynamic glazing), renewable energy systems, water measurement devices, and energy measurement devices. 

Plans for Operation starts with developing a high-performance building operation plan. In addition to tracking and recording energy and water use, site sustainability must be maintained through preservation of site vegetation. Indoor environmental quality is to be maintained through outdoor airflow measurement and indoor air quality maintenance. Finally, a maintenance plan must be developed and implemented that covers the building mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. This section is important because as the building systems become more complex to reduce energy use and improve indoor environmental quality, it is necessary that these systems function as they were designed. Otherwise, system performance will suffer and with it the energy use will increase, indoor environmental quality will decrease, and there will be a negative impact on the surrounding environment.

<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

RICHARD , NC, United States, 03/04/14 07:03 AM:

Personally I think the acoustical values listed in and about silence in the classroom, has not lived up to the standards of which acoustical engineers require and need. In my opinion it is simply ignored and pushed to the side. I am not an acoustical engineer at all, but I see scope of acoustical talked about and nothing is done to provide the students silence. I grew up, without knowing I had a deficiency in my hearing and I am sure I missed a lot during these years of study. Still I see no progress in helping the acoustical engineers with bring quite to the classrooms.
RICHARD , NC, United States, 03/04/14 07:08 AM:

I am an owner of UFAD air conditioning diffusers. I have seen little advance towards UFAD diffusers being used in classrooms or commercial buildings to a very small percentage of the buildings. UFAD is validated by the industry in energy conservation and near total comfort, only to have these factors ignored. IAQ can and is improved by using UFAD and brings comfort to the occupants, to which the occupants has total control of there personal comfort.
Anonymous , 05/20/14 08:04 AM:

The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.