Filter replacement: 5 signs it’s time for a change

Testing and monitoring offer best indications of filter health.


Filters are essential in food and beverage safety. The right system of pre-filters and final filters will keep oil, moisture, microbes, and dirt particles out of your equipment and products. But when to replace those filters is often an overlooked question in plant management. Monitoring differential pressure (DP) in real-time is another way to tell whether it’s time for a filter change-out. Image courtesy: Donaldson Company Inc.

If you’re not monitoring the performance of your air, steam, and liquid filters, they can clog up and shut down your process, or put your final product at risk. After maximum capacity, a filter also will require more energy from other equipment that has to work harder under stress. 

Conversely, filters changed at regular but arbitrary intervals—every three months or after 800 batches, for example—might rack up unnecessary costs. You could be replacing filters that still have life, while also incurring labor and downtime expenses. It’s laudable to have a preventive maintenance plan, but that plan should be based on a thorough understanding of your unique process and filter demands.

There are five ways to determine when it’s most appropriate to change your air, steam, or liquid filters:

1. When sterile membrane elements reach their steam sterilization limit

Membrane elements are designed to be the final filter before products are packaged and shipped. As these filters build up live bacteria, they require steam sterilization to prevent those microorganisms from growing through the membrane and contaminating the product.  On-site or remote testing will confirm if your elements are operating at optimal efficiency. Image courtesy: Donaldson Company Inc.

Steam sterilization kills microbes, but doesn’t remove the debris they leave behind. In that sense, sterilizing is not a regenerative process that resets differential pressure to a new condition. But it will render the bacteria inert and keep them from propagating. 

Because steam sterilizing is a high-temp process, it puts stress on the element and wears it out after a number of cycles. Check your manufacturer’s recommendations on cycle limits. Anything beyond that can compromise the element and possibly the purity of your product. Most elements on the market allow for 80 to 90 steam sterilization cycles, although newer technology allows for 100 cycles or more. 

2. When steam filters reach their limit of ultrasonic baths

When it comes to steam filters, there’s another kind of cleaning limit. Since most steam filter elements are stainless steel, they’re regenerated with ultrasonic baths to extend filter life. This is a cleaning process that removes accumulated particulates; but it’s also destructive cleaning that will begin to degrade the media—to the point where it is no longer sufficiently effective. 

During the first few cycles, ultra-sonic cleaning will reset the filter’s differential pressure to its original performance. But each subsequent cleaning renders the filter less and less effective at restoring that new condition, and intervals between cleanings will become shorter. At a certain point, it won’t be worth the service and change-out time you’re investing. 

3. When integrity testing indicates the filters have reached capacity

On-site or remote testing will confirm if your elements are operating at optimal efficiency. In a formal integrity test, the elements are placed in equipment that measures differential pressure (DP), efficiency, or both. DP levels will detect clogging or structural compromise. If pressure is next to nothing, for instance, there might be a hole in the media or the pleat pack may be damaged. 

There are various test methods for air, steam, and liquid filters. For liquid membrane filters, a bubble-point test is performed, where pressurized air is applied to a wetted membrane to determine how readily a bubble forms on the opposite side. Integrity testing looks at the pore size of the media and provides a bubble point value. 

Integrity testing, in the best case, is performed after sterilization and before a run. There are two reasons for this sequence: 

  1. It verifies that the element is good before it is used; 
  2. It verifies that the previous sterilization did not damage the filter. Sterilization is more likely to cause damage than any other point in use.

Integrity testing will determine if your filters are performing up to manufacturer guidelines—or whether your facility puts lesser or greater demand on a given filter design. If your air is more contaminated than average, for instance, testing might support replacement every four months rather than the recommended six. In facilities with many similar elements, integrity testing is usually randomized, as well. You pull two or three representative elements to learn about the performance of all of them.  

4. When differential pressure rises to a pre-determined level

Monitoring DP in real-time is another way to tell whether it’s time for a filter change-out. With gauges on each side of an element and remote sensors, you’ll be alerted to a pressure drop downstream, and can regenerate or replace the filters before they trigger a costly shutdown. This method is more difficult in plants with complex filtration systems.

The filter manufacturer may recommend a pressure differential that justifies attention. But sometimes the decision may come down to economics. If a filter starts out at 1 or 2 psi and can be regenerated, you might delay its change until 10 psi. You’ll need to run your pumps at a higher volume, though, to maintain a consistent flow rate, creating a trade-off between energy and element costs. If your elements are costly, you might tolerate that higher utility draw. But if the filter elements are relatively inexpensive, replacing them at 5 psi might be worth it. Liquid applications usually can tolerate a higher pressure drop than compressed air applications.

Don’t forget about downtime in your cost-benefit equation. An ultrasonic bath may reset the DP and improve catching capacity, for instance, but it takes time to pull the elements and it interrupts production. Knowing total downtime costs is essential in setting up a filter replacement schedule that makes sense.

5. When your unique preventive maintenance schedule says so

Even if five facilities are filtering the same liquid, they’ll all require a different maintenance schedule based on their unique conditions and filter combinations. City or well water will vary, as will contaminants. There may even be seasonal fluctuations in air or water quality that drive inconsistent demands on the filter. 

Most food and beverage processing plants need a variety of element types in their processes. Some can be monitored for DP and ultrasonically cleaned, and others cannot. Some expire after a set number of steam sterilization cycles, while others have flex. Filter management accounts for all these variations.

The ideal schedule for filter changes, then, is highly individualized. Rather than creating a maintenance schedule around fixed calendar dates, batches, or sterilization cycles, a better approach is to start with your manufacturer’s recommendations as a baseline. Then do integrity testing and DP monitoring to adjust from there. This creates the most cost-effective, long-term strategy. 

A customized plan includes how frequently to steam sterilize, as well. If you use membrane elements at the end of a water-bottling process, for example, you could integrity-test the filters at the end of a selected shift and extrapolate that data over weeks or months to approximate the right interval.

There’s a “sweet spot” between replacing filters too frequently and not doing so often enough. Mold and bacteria can make people sick, and hazards can be immediate—or multiply over time if you use elements filter past their ideal life. Your energy costs will rack up too. Testing and return-on-investment analysis are the only ways to develop a change-out schedule that hits a cost-risk balance. 

Richard Juskowiak is a product support specialist, and Robert Connor Rohina is an application engineer in the process filtration division of Donaldson Company, Inc.

The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2017 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
Welding ergonomics, 2017 Salary Survey, and surge protection
2017 Top Plant winner, Best practices, Plant Engineering at 70, Top 10 stories of 2017
Pipe fabrication and IIoT; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
Product of the Year winners, Pattern recognition, Engineering analytics, Revitalize older pump installations
Control room technology innovation; Practical approaches to corrosion protection; Pipeline regulator revises quality programs
The cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Setting internal automation standards
Knowing how and when to use parallel generators
PID controllers, Solar-powered SCADA, Using 80 GHz radar sensors

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me