Device level, systems level harmonic mitigation solutions

Rudy Wodrich of Square D explains the differences between device level and system level harmonic mitigation solutions, their characteristics, their pros and cons and why you should understand them.

09/05/2007


In general, device level solutions are attractive to consulting engineers because they can force each equipment vendor (UPS, VSD, etc.) to comply with harmonic limits at the point of connection of their individual piece of equipment. However, the shortcoming of device-level solutions is that the individual vendors may comply with the specification in different ways and,

For example, on a recent institutional building project, the consultant had specified harmonic limits for individual equipment. The uninterruptible power supply (UPS) vendor for the computer lab UPS complied by providing a 5th harmonic passive filter on the input of the UPS. The variable speed drive (VSD) vendor for the elevator drives managed to convince the consultant that his small VSDs should be exempt from the requirement. The vendor for the HVAC equipment provided 6-pulse drives with 3% line reactors to comply with the harmonic limits. A third VSD vendor was selected for process equipment drives used in a laboratory and implemented broadband filters on these devices. Finally, a separate section of the specification required that there be automatic power factor correction equipment installed on the service entrance. The vendor of the
distribution equipment supplied this equipment but without taking into account the possibility of harmonics on the network. Two negative interactions took place.

First, the switching of the power factor correction capacitors had a tendency to cause voltage transients and cause the elevator drives to trip on an‘overvoltage’ alarm. This could have been avoided if the consultant had insisted on making the elevator vendor provide line reactors in front of his VSDs. In addition to reducing harmonics, line reactors provide a measure of transient protection to the drive. Second, the harmonics had been reduced by all the measures implemented at the device level (line reactors, 5th filters and broadband filters), but the capacitor bank created a sharp resonance at the 11th harmonic with the upstream transformer. As a result, the 11th harmonic current was magnified dramatically and the capacitors failed prematurely after only six months in service. During this resonance, the harmonic levels at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) were approaching the limits outlined in the IEEE 519 guidelines.

Furthermore, the harmonic standards (such as IEEE 519 in North America or G5/4 in the UK) used by the electrical utility are enforced not at the device level, but rather at the PCC. It is possible to comply at the device level but, due to interactions between loads and even parts of the medium voltage network, not comply at the PCC. Only a detailed network study and simulation can ensure that these types of problems are avoided.

Systems level solutions
It is often far more economical to take a systems level approach versus a device level approach. A systems level approach can take into account load diversity and natural harmonic cancellation that can occur due to phase shifting within the electrical network.
The two most common examples of systems level solutions are passive filters and active filters. Systems level passive filters are quite similar to device level tuned filters. They employ stages of reactor/capacitor usually switched with electromechanical contactors and controlled by a microprocessor that energizes the stages based on reactive power requirements %%MDASSML%% in other words, power factor. Passive filter design requires accurate load data and usually involves some kind of complex and time consuming computer modeling to ensure adequate removal of harmonics (compliance with standards), and that the filter itself will not be overloaded. System models must also take into account if the network can be fed from backup generators, as passive filters will behave quite differently in this instance.

Most system level passive filters are designed to remove a portion of the dominant 5th harmonic while avoiding resonance. It should be noted that system level passive filters need to be carefully designed to ensure long-term stability of the passive components. A passive filter that is under-designed could overload the capacitors, causing them to decline prematurely. As this occurs, the 5th harmonic filter can become a 5th harmonic amplifier %%MDASSML%% exactly opposite to the desired effect. Given this limitation, it is also possible for future load changes with higher harmonic levels to catastrophically affect the passive filter and once again have end users exceeding harmonic limits at the PCC.

Passive filters also provide the side benefit of correcting system displacement power factor, which may or may not be required depending on the load conditions. For example, a load which is predominantly ac VFDs requires harmonic filtering but does not need any displacement power factor correction since ac VFDs have displacement power factor in excess of 90%. In this instance %%MDASSML%% and many others %%MDASSML%% it may be more attractive to use an active filter.

Active harmonic filters
Active harmonic filters are sometimes called active power line conditioners. Rather than block or shunt harmonic currents, active filters attempt to condition them. Active harmonic filters monitor and sense harmonic currents and generate corresponding waveforms to counter the original harmonic currents. The generated waveform is injected back into the electrical supply to cancel the harmonic current generated by the load. The advantages of active filters include:
• Simple design tools %%MDASSML%% no complex computer modeling required
• Guaranteed compliance with harmonic standards %%MDASSML%% treats all harmonics from H2 up to H50 (some brands)
• It is impossible to overload an active filter
• Multiple units can be paralleled together for larger power applications or as load increases in the future
• Active filters can be programmed to ignore or to correct displacement power factor as well as harmonics
• Active filters can be used with all types of harmonic-producing loads: UPS, VSD, rectifiers, etc.
• Active filters work equally well on utility or generator-fed networks (their function is not impedance-dependent).

There are some simple rules for safely using active filters, including the need for 3% or greater line reactors on most harmonic-producing loads. Also, there are special precautions that must be taken when applying active filters in conjunction with capacitor systems or any stray network capacitance. However, if these guidelines are followed, the active filter is by far the simplest and most effective means to attack harmonic problems.

So what is the right solution for your electrical network? The answer is %%MDASSML%% it depends. There are many factors to be considered when tackling a harmonic mitigation project. A device level approach may be right for you or it may be necessary to take a holistic approach to the entire system. The good news is that there are experts out there who can help you analyze both the technical and economic aspects of the available options and come to an educated decision.

Rudy T. Wodrich is the director of the Power Quality Group of Schneider Electric / Square D in Toronto, Ontario. He has worked in the power quality field for more than 15 years. His team has the responsibility to solve power quality problems relating to flicker, harmonics, voltage sag and power factor.





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
2016 Product of the Year; Diagnose bearing failures; Asset performance management; Testing dust collector performance measures
Safety for 18 years, warehouse maintenance tips, Ethernet and the IIoT, GAMS 2016 recap
2016 Engineering Leaders Under 40; Future vision: Where is manufacturing headed?; Electrical distribution, redefined
SCADA at the junction, Managing risk through maintenance, Moving at the speed of data
Safety at every angle, Big Data's impact on operations, bridging the skills gap
The digital oilfield: Utilizing Big Data can yield big savings; Virtualization a real solution; Tracking SIS performance
Applying network redundancy; Overcoming loop tuning challenges; PID control and networks
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing arc flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Package boilers; Natural gas infrared heating; Thermal treasure; Standby generation; Natural gas supports green efforts

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
This article collection contains several articles on the vital role of plant safety and offers advice on best practices.
This article collection contains several articles on the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and how it is transforming manufacturing.
This article collection contains several articles on strategic maintenance and understanding all the parts of your plant.
click me