What food processors should know about the new earthquake building

USRC’s new rating system gives owners a consistent way to determine facility earthquake safety.


USRC’s new rating system gives owners a consistent way to determine facility earthquake safety. Courtesy: StellarIn November 2015, the United States Resiliency Council (USRC) launched the USRC Earthquake Building Rating System, a first-of-its-kind performance-rating system for seismic hazards. This system is the first reliable, consistent method to determine how susceptible buildings may be to earthquakes, providing facility owners, insurance providers and engineers with a better understanding of how to prevent losses. The rating system assesses buildings on three important criteria.

The USRC's rating system allows food processors who own or plan to own properties in states susceptible to earthquakes, such as California, Nevada and Washington, to obtain reliable, consistent information about a building's expected performance during an earthquake. As a result, they can mitigate losses and downtime due to earthquakes, which is crucial in the food-processing industry.

What is the USRC?

The USRC was established in 2011 because of the rising concern about communities' resilience to natural disasters. A joint Applied Technology Council (ATC) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) stakeholder's workshop began to develop the rating system. Two major issues the workshop wanted to address were:

  • The need for a system implemented by a nonprofit private-sector entity
  • The need to maintain the system's long-term integrity.

As a result, the USRC was formed, and in collaboration with the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California (SEAONC), it created the underlying criteria of the performance rating. The basis for these ratings was determined using decades of research and data collection on factors like:

  • Ground-shaking intensity expected to occur an average of once every 475 years
  • Frequency of seismic activity in the area
  • The distance from the epicenter of the earthquake to the building.

Most seismic building codes are enforced by local governments or other entities and vary from state to state. The USRC's rating system allows owners to construct or modify their buildings to meet a specified level of safety, rather than accept varying minimal precautions prescribed by building codes.

Three performance measures

The USRC Earthquake Building Rating System assesses three separate performance measures on a five-star scale. (Note: this is not a required compliance program; building owners may adhere to it on a voluntary basis.)

  • Safety. The safety rating concerns personnel inside the building and the potential life loss that could result from an earthquake. It is an indicator of how easily people can get out of the building and avoid severe personal injury or death during and after a seismic incident. Primary dangers to workers due to earthquakes include:

    • Being struck by structural components and inadequately secured stored materials
    • Burns resulting from building fires due to gas leaks or electrical shorts
    • Exposure to chemicals released from stored or process chemicals
    • A five-star rating in this performance measure indicates that injuries to personnel are unlikely. A one-star rating indicates that loss of life is likely in the building.

    • Damage. The damage rating illustrates the estimated cost to repair the building after an event as a percentage of the building's overall replacement cost. It includes the cost of damage to the building's:

      • Structural components
      • Mechanical components
      • Electrical components
      • Plumbing components

Note: It does not include damage caused by breaks in the water and gas pipes. A five-star rating in this performance measure indicates that the building will suffer minimal damage, likely less than five percent of the building replacement cost. A one-star rating indicates that the building will suffer severe damage, likely more than 40 percent of the building's replacement cost.

  • Recovery. The recovery rating considers the estimated time until the building may be used for basic functions after an earthquake. It reflects the minimum time needed to complete necessary repairs and remove hazards and damages to the building before the building can be declared fit for occupancy.

A five-star rating in this performance measure indicates that the building will be fit for use immediately or within a few days from the incident. A one-star rating indicates that the building may not be operational for more than a year.

Voluntary rating system

While food processors should continue to take the necessary steps to prepare for an earthquake, using the Earthquake Building Rating System can give you a clearer idea of how severely an earthquake could damage your facility.

Ratings are performed by USRC-certified engineers, who provide an objective evaluation of the building's expected performance. The following building aspects are considered in the Earthquake Building Rating System:

  • Building structure
  • Mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems
  • Cladding
  • Windows
  • Partitions
  • Ceilings.

Food processors can choose two types of ratings given by USRC based on business needs:

  • Transaction rating. This is used as a reliable transactional due-diligence report that meets the demands of the finance markets for commercial real estate. It is useful for making decisions regarding property investment and risk exposure, but it is not permitted to be used in marketing materials. A transaction rating is valid up to five years.
  • Verified rating. This includes a technical review of the building's evaluation and can be used for promotional, marketing and publicity purposes. Owners must renew their verified rating every five years.

The USRC plans on expanding its resilience rating systems in the near future to include other natural hazards such as hurricanes, floods and tornadoes.

-Sonja Antunovic-Curcic is a senior architectural designer at Stellar. This article originally appeared on Stellar Food for Thought. Stellar is a CFE Media content partner. Edited by Erin Dunne, production coordinator, CFE Media, edunne@cfemedia.com.

The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2017 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
SCCR, 2018 Maintenance study, and VFDs in a washdown environment.
Welding ergonomics, 2017 Salary Survey, and surge protection
2017 Top Plant winner, Best practices, Plant Engineering at 70, Top 10 stories of 2017
Product of the Year winners, Pattern recognition, Engineering analytics, Revitalize older pump installations
Control room technology innovation; Practical approaches to corrosion protection; Pipeline regulator revises quality programs
The cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Setting internal automation standards
Knowing how and when to use parallel generators
PID controllers, Solar-powered SCADA, Using 80 GHz radar sensors

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me