Downturn a good time to review, improve process optimization

The global economic slowdown seemed to hit with full force this past fall. Financing for capital projects began to tighten, and hurdles to justify capital projects began to rise. For many process manufacturers, these economic conditions have caused a shift in business objectives from increasing production to decreasing the costs of goods sold.

03/01/2009


The global economic slowdown seemed to hit with full force this past fall. Financing for capital projects began to tighten, and hurdles to justify capital projects began to rise. For many process manufacturers, these economic conditions have caused a shift in business objectives from increasing production to decreasing the costs of goods sold.

So, if you’re an engineer in a process manufacturing plant, what are you supposed to do now?

More than ever, it starts with squeezing more out of the plant you already have by increasing product yields while reducing energy usage; waste and off-spec products; and unplanned downtime.

Reducing the variability of your process is key to many of these savings and improvements. The trick is to identify the low-hanging fruit that doesn’t require a large capital outlay and pays for itself quickly.

As author of the Emerson Process Experts blog ( www.EmersonProcessXperts.com ), I’ve had the chance to profile many process optimization experts. I’ve culled some of their best ideas on places to begin to identify these optimization opportunities. Their experiences %%MDASSML%% collected and logged over the years %%MDASSML%% show that the major causes of variability include:

  • Control valve performance %%MDASSML%% 30%

  • Improper tuning %%MDASSML%% 30%

  • Improper process and/or control scheme design %%MDASSML%% 20%

  • Other %%MDASSML%% 20%.

    • The 20% of other causes are not necessarily design- or control-scheme related, but more operational issues that occur over time. These can include pump and compressor issues; electrical interference or grounding issues on the instrumentation signals; humidity; vibration; and a host of “ others .”

      Size control valves properly

      Proper control valve sizing and maintenance helps to reduce process variability.
      Start with making your process dynamics as linear as possible. Control valves , being variable in gain, must be correctly sized and characterized for the application’s flow to be sufficiently linear to stay within specified gain limits over the operating range of the process. Greg McMillan, of the ModelingAndControl.com blog, also recommends that you closely consider these five basic valve requirements:

      • Linearity

      • Dead time

      • Response time

      • Resolution

      • Dead band.

        • Greg also recommends using digital positioners on throttle valves to get feedback, high resolution and stable calibration. Many control valve sizing programs, educational courses and specialists are available to help you.

          Minimize loop dead time

          Next, minimize loop dead time. In addition to control valves, sources of dead time include inadequate signal conditioning on transmitters, incorrect transmitter range/resolution, poor physical location of transmitters and measurement lags from applied filters and dampeners.

          Using smart transmitters reduces process and ambient measurement effects, provides stable calibration and returns diagnostics about the transmitter’s health and the health of the surrounding process back to the automation system. Your automation system makes better control decisions with reliable process data provided by these diagnostics.

          Measure process dynamics

          With the control valves sized and loop dead time minimized, it’s time to measure the process dynamics %%MDASSML%% both the linear and non-linear components %%MDASSML%% to tune up your process regulatory control. Process dynamics analysis/diagnostic software can help you identify the simple and complex process dynamics to tune the control loops properly. Guesswork and rule-of-thumb-based tuning can often introduce more variability into the process than they eliminate. Software tools, training, and/or experts are available to help you successfully measure your process dynamics.

          Compensate for process dynamics

          For the non-linear portions of the overall process dynamics, your best approach is to reduce these nonlinearities as much as possible. One way is to improve the control strategy by changing any master loop configuration to prevent interaction with the slave loops. See if you can remove unnecessary interlocks that may disturb the control loop. If you uncover extremely high process gains, adding upstream control loops can help. Other advanced regulatory control strategies such as feedforward, cascade, override and split-range control can compensate for different process conditions.

          Gain scheduling is available in many automation system controllers for loops with nonlinearities. Different regions of the PID controller can have different PID tuning parameters. The goal is to break the non-linear response curves into linear regions and apply the correct tuning parameters for each region.

          Finally, you can tweak most modern PID control algorithms to handle special conditions with filters, dead bands and rate limits for the proportional, integral and derivative actions.

          Tune the loops

          Now that you have the 30% variability caused by control valve issues and 20% from process and control schemes under control, it’s time to tune those loops. For loops with linear process dynamics and the other ones you have linearized through control algorithm compensation, use the Lambda tuning method to tune for the speed required without oscillation. Also, look for software that monitors the variability in the loops in real time and notifies the appropriate plant staff when excessive variability returns.

          Apply advanced controls

          Advanced variability monitoring software helps spot poorly performing control loops.
          Solid regulatory control is important for successful advanced controls such as Model Predictive Control (MPC). With this solid foundation in place, next look at your big energy-consuming units such as distillation columns, cracking furnaces, fired heaters, boilers, spray dryers and kilns to apply MPC. Instead of operating these units as a collection of loops, this advanced control algorithm, which runs in the automation system controller, finds the best combination of setpoints to minimize energy consumption and maximize the unit’s throughput.

          While some of these recommendations require capital expenditure, many require only expertise, time and focus. Anything you can do to reduce process variability helps you reduce energy usage, lower waste and rework, increase product yield and reduce unplanned downtime.

          Proper control valve sizing and maintenance helps to reduce process variability.


          <table ID = 'id2296643-0-table' CELLSPACING = '0' CELLPADDING = '2' WIDTH = '100%' BORDER = '0'><tbody ID = 'id2296201-0-tbody'><tr ID = 'id2296203-0-tr'><td ID = 'id2296205-0-td' CLASS = 'table' STYLE = 'background-color: #EEEEEE'> Author Information </td></tr><tr ID = 'id2296215-3-tr'><td ID = 'id2296217-3-td' CLASS = 'table'> Jim Cahill is a 20-year veteran with </td></tr></tbody></table>

          Lambda tuning method



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.