The risk/cost of oil in the air supply

For many sectors of process and energy industries such as food and drink, pharmaceutical, electronics, textile manufacturing, as well as nuclear and offshore engineering, there is a need for pure process air without the additional costs, limitations, and risks related to in-line filtration systems.


Key Concepts
  • Filters cannot remove all the oil coming from a lubricated compressor.

  • Oil-free compressors cost more, but capital costs over a 10-yr period are only 7% of total running costs.

  • Consequences of oil in process air must be carefully evaluated.

Change of view
The risk
Capital costs
Is oil free air needed?

For many sectors of process and energy industries such as food and drink, pharmaceutical, electronics, textile manufacturing, as well as nuclear and offshore engineering, there is a need for pure process air without the additional costs, limitations, and risks related to in-line filtration systems.

The question of air quality and its relevance to these industries and other applications is one that has been debated by suppliers and users of compressed air equipment for many years. In the past, the choice was simple; if air quality was important, an oil-free compressor was used; if air quality was unimportant, an oil-lubricated compressor was used.

In both instances it would be rare to see a filter in place other than on the inlet of the compressor. In recent years it has become increasingly common to see oil-lubricated machines fitted with banks of filters and operating in processing environments that would formerly have required oil-free machines and oil-free air.

Change of view

What has brought about this significant change of view? Is it due to a sudden increase in efficiency and reliability of filtration equipment, or perhaps an increase in the efficiency and effectiveness of filtration salesmen?

Could the reason be that in times of economic hardship, short-term, lower-cost solutions become more attractive under the ever-increasing influence of company accountants, despite the convincing counter-arguments of quality control and engineering departments?

Maybe it is simply that, despite being environmentally aware, '90s production people just have not yet come around to thinking about the compressed air part of the process? The arguments for the different types of systems are many and complex and need to be reviewed painstakingly, application by application. But, the decision starting point must always be "What quality of air do I need?" to be quickly followed by "What is the impact of not achieving that quality?"

The risk

Using a modern lubricated compressor without any filters will result in the presence of oil at 3 ppm in the air supply when everything is working according to design. If the compressed air is being used in a plant to drive wrenches and nutrunners, this level of air quality may suffice. The risk of excess oil coming down the line only means that the tools would need more cleaning and possibly more maintenance.

On the other hand, in a textiles application where the air is driving threads across looms, any oil carryover could have an obvious and serious effect on the quality of the product.

The risk of oil going through the system and contaminating production equipment is totally unacceptable. Any system that relies on an oil-lubricated air compressor will have oil introduced into the system. The absence of maintenance or the addition of filters may vary the amount. But, how much is acceptable must be evaluated along with operating costs (Fig. 1).

It is fair to say that most applications are a combination of these extremes; the majority of users would prefer oil-free air by whatever method it can be achieved. Quantifying the element of risk is something that can only be done accurately by the manager operating the plant.

Consider the outcome when things do not go according to plan. For example, if ambient conditions do not match the design criteria then the obvious question that has to be asked is, "How good are the filters?"

The answer is that at specified and fixed inlet conditions of temperature and pressure, and if regularly maintained, the best products can achieve levels of filtration (using two filters) about as efficient as 0.01 ppm at 70 F.

However, even this small amount of oil carryover builds up in time to a significant volume. The real world also has a habit of varying considerably from design conditions. A small increase in the ambient air temperature can cause the filtration system to pass more oil.

If maintenance is not done properly or frequently enough, more oil may be passed. Of greater concern, if filters are not maintained properly, they are liable to collapse and pass almost all of the oil out of the compressor straight into the product process.

This particular problem has been recognized by many major manufacturers and authorities, including the FDA in the U.S., who proposed "...that compressed air must be supplied free of oil and oil vapor because (we are) not aware of oil filters that can remove oil vapor."

Capital costs

Although there are filters that claim to remove oil vapor, their effectiveness is very reliant on inlet conditions and thorough, frequent maintenance. Considering this, it may not seem unreasonable to question why anyone buys compressors that need filtration.

The major factor most usually cited is capital cost. While it is fair to say that in almost all cases an oil-free compressor will cost more than its oil lubricated equivalent plus a bank of filters, it has been shown that the initial capital cost of a new compressor plant represents only 7% of the total running costs of a compressor over a 10-yr period.

A filter bank user is tied into a program of buying and replacing filter elements throughout the life of the compressor in an attempt to maintain the desired level of air quality. Although the level of capital cost will always be important, should the investment cost factor be allowed to compromise end product quality?

Looking at applications where air quality is important, it can be seen that plant managers may in general use an oil-free compressor because the consequences of a failure in any one of the elements of the filtration system would be disastrous.

In such situations the possibility of the capital cost being slightly higher for oil-free compressor systems is irrelevant when compared with the costs involved in a system failure, maintenance, and energy. Consequently, the price for improvements in operations efficiency and reduced maintenance becomes almost incidental by comparison (Fig. 2).

Is oil free air needed?

On what basis does the decision need to be made? It's back to the starting point, "Do I need oil-free air?" If the answer is no, save some money and install an oil-lubricated compressor.

If the answer is yes, then consider the consequences of a costly failure in the system and the effects of dumping oil into the process, contaminating pipe work and equipment on the way. A 100 cfm compressor working normally will put up to a gallon of oil into a system in a year of operation.

Once these figures for the system have been correctly quantified, an informed decision can be made about what kind of system may need to be installed.

Present trends indicate that there will come a time in the relatively near future when process air consists of nothing but air; any oil required by the process or product can be added at the point of requirement as opposed to being present as a by-product of the compression process.

The environmental impact of filtering out any oil and its disposal methods is becoming an important issue with buyers. They will have to look into the process to ensure they can guarantee the quality of the product and, as a result, the oil-free process will become attractive.

More Info: Atlas Copco can be reached at 413-536-0600. Article edited by Joseph L. Foszcz, Senior Editor, 630-288-8776,

The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2017 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
SCCR, 2018 Maintenance study, and VFDs in a washdown environment.
Welding ergonomics, 2017 Salary Survey, and surge protection
2017 Top Plant winner, Best practices, Plant Engineering at 70, Top 10 stories of 2017
Product of the Year winners, Pattern recognition, Engineering analytics, Revitalize older pump installations
Control room technology innovation; Practical approaches to corrosion protection; Pipeline regulator revises quality programs
The cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Setting internal automation standards
Knowing how and when to use parallel generators
PID controllers, Solar-powered SCADA, Using 80 GHz radar sensors

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me