Performance contracting: Gaining competitive advantage

Editor's note: This is the first of a two-part series on performance contracting. The second part will appear in the August issue. Performance contracting is a tool that more and more companies are applying to outsource plant services. These include maintenance contracts, technical services, logistics support, auxiliary plant operations and maintenance, plant engineering, shutdowns, facilities ...


Performance contracting is a tool that more and more companies are applying to outsource plant services. These include maintenance contracts, technical services, logistics support, auxiliary plant operations and maintenance, plant engineering, shutdowns, facilities management, and MRO management. The challenge is to apply performance contracting to maximize its benefits.

What are performance contracts?

Performance contracts are service agreements in which the service supplier is compensated, totally or in part, based on an attribute of the service that the buyer deems to be of significant value. Performance contracts for one-of-a-kind, ad hoc services usually base compensation on service attributes that are completely or almost completely in the control of the service supplier. Examples include service quality measures, completion milestones, and/or some sort of productivity, savings, or cost metric. At the other extreme, performance contracts for consulting or total plant maintenance can include significant compensation for results achieved in partnership with the client. Plant reliability, production costs, plant throughput, and product quality are compensation metrics in these more advanced performance contracts.

Why use performance contracts?

What and how much you outsource in an industrial facility are questions of operating strategy and strategic compromise.

The benefits justifying decisions to outsource plant services typically include:

  • Lower fixed costs

  • Greater labor flexibility

  • Higher productivity and lower labor costs

  • Access to a broader or better array of skills and expertise

  • Broader, more effective knowledge base

  • Cost avoidance related to establishment of needed training processes, management systems, etc.

  • Desire to focus internal resources on core competencies.

    • In contrast, decisions to self-perform rather than outsource usually involve one or more of the following needs:

      • Tight control of proprietary information or strategic skills

      • Alignment of work force goals and objectives with the strategic imperatives of the plant owner

      • Avoidance of perceived risk related to costs, public relations, productivity, priorities, communications, and/or control of the work force

      • Avoidance of labor relations issues from outsourcing.

        • An effective performance contract maximizes the benefits of outsourcing while eliminating or minimizing the need to self-perform. Properly structured performance contracts also reduce the cost of contracting and contract administration versus more conventional contracting approaches.

          Critical success factors

          Critical success factors for performance contracting include:

          • Establishment and communica-tion of a clear vision and business plan for how outsourced services and the out-sourcing approach will support the operating strategy and create competitive advantage for the plant owner. The staffs of owner and contractor must thoroughly understand the business concepts, performance requirements, and financial ramifications driving performance contracts to deliver expected results.

          • Deep commitment by owners and outsourcers to a partnering philosophy that is centered around candor, win-win decision making, common goals, accountability, transparency, effective teamwork, elimination of redun-dancy, and lasting relationships. The most effective performance contracts for outsourced services eliminate the wastes of convention-al contracting approaches by driving partnering principles deep into the fabric of the plant popula-tion. Training and behavior model-ing by management are essential.

          • Selection of an outsourcing partner with superior competen-cies, cost structures, and a compatible culture that are deliverable for and applicable to the plant strategy and vision. Although the plant owner has significant influence on the success of any performance contract, the benefits of perfor-mance contracting are ultimately limited by the resources and capa-bilities of the contractor. The sidebar on page 26 summarizes contractor selection criteria of some of the Fortune 500 companies that use performance contracting.

          • A flexible performance-based contract that enables, promotes, and requires behaviors and results consistent with the vision, strategy, philosophies, and goals. Although no contract can assure success by itself, the performance contract is a critical tool for enabling achievement of targeted performance levels. Unlike a more conventional contract, a performance contract should set the tone for a win-win business arrangement addressing issues related to teamwork, train-ing, and cultivation of the relation-ship. The performance fees avail-able should be a significant part of potential contractor revenues and relate directly to the value of the owner for achieving targeted per-formance levels. Although princi-pally focused on results, the metrics that drive performance fees can give some weighting to reflect impor-tance of processes, communica-tions, and behaviors.

          • Management visibility and involvement. Steering contract execution and enhancement of the partnering relationship via performance contracts require a higher level of interaction among the management of the plant owner and contractor to achieve superior performance versus conventional contracting. By modeling needed and desired behaviors, management demon-strates the teamwork, communica-tions, problem solving, and accountability necessary to grow the success of the symbiotic reliance owner and contractor must have upon each other.

            • Performance fee metrics example
              Total plant maintenance outsourcing contract

              Weight Metric Comments
              40%Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)Focusing on all drivers of plant capacity aligns contractor with the plant owner's operations team
              30%Maintenance budgetPlacing significant accountability for cost control on contractor assures cost effectiveness of services supplied
              10%Safety and environmentalThe maintenance function plays an important role in safety and environmental compliance of the plant and must be part of performance measurements
              10%Value creationThe performance metrics must provide incentives for the contractor and his employees to drive value in other areas of plant performance (capital cost avoidance, return on assets, etc.)
              10%Customer satisfactionPlacing some amount of the performance fee on a number of subjective measurements such as teamwork, responsiveness, communications, etc., emphasizes mutual dependency and the need to build relationships.

              Author Information
              Jim Humphries, Vice President of Performance Technology for Fluor, has spent over 25 years in operations and maintenance. He has inspired step-change improvements in manufacturing, purchasing, materials management, quality, maintenance, engineering, human relations, training, and marketing. He can be reached at

              Performance contractor selection criteria

              A performance contractor should be able to demonstrate these attributes:

              Results-driven culture with history of providing competitive advantage for customers through step changes in productivity, reliability, etc.

              Process-focused quality systems meeting or comparable to ISO requirements

              Availability of required expertise, systems, and processes

              World-class safety record

              Extensive experience establishing performance contracts that generate significant savings or added revenues for clients

              Computer-based training programs to cost effectively establish, maintain, and raise worker skill levels

              Proven performance-based incentives to engage contractor employees in the plant owner's business goals and creation of value in alignment with the performance contract


Top Plant
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2017 Top Plant.
Product of the Year
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
System Integrator of the Year
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
May 2018
Electrical standards, robots and Lean manufacturing, and how an aluminum packaging plant is helping community growth.
April 2018
2017 Product of the Year winners, retrofitting a press, IMTS and Hannover Messe preview, natural refrigerants, testing steam traps
March 2018
SCCR, 2018 Maintenance study, and VFDs in a washdown environment.
April 2018
ROVs, rigs, and the real time; wellsite valve manifolds; AI on a chip; analytics use for pipelines
February 2018
Focus on power systems, process safety, electrical and power systems, edge computing in the oil & gas industry
December 2017
Product of the Year winners, Pattern recognition, Engineering analytics, Revitalize older pump installations
Spring 2018
Burners for heat-treating furnaces, CHP, dryers, gas humidification, and more
April 2018
Implementing a DCS, stepper motors, intelligent motion control, remote monitoring of irrigation systems
February 2018
Setting internal automation standards

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

The Maintenance and Reliability Coach's blog
Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
One Voice for Manufacturing
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Maintenance and Reliability Professionals Blog
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Machine Safety
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
Research Analyst Blog
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Marshall on Maintenance
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
Lachance on CMMS
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
Maintenance & Safety
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
Industrial Analytics
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
IIoT: Operations & IT
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Randy Steele
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Matthew J. Woo, PE, RCDD, LEED AP BD+C
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Randy Oliver
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
Data Centers: Impacts of Climate and Cooling Technology
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
Safety First: Arc Flash 101
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
Critical Power: Hospital Electrical Systems
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me