Dennis Brandl: How to fold an IT project

Manufacturing IT projects contain more than just software. Knowing how to salvage manufacturing IT project components is key for intellectual capital preservation.

10/08/2009


It's important to know when to fold a manufacturing IT project, but it is equally important to know what to do when you fold a project. Many manufacturing IT projects do not finish, not necessarily because they failed, but because of changing requirements, changing business conditions, company mergers, or changes in products and processes.

A manufacturing IT project contains more than just software. Any project, whether it's a PLC program, DCS program, MES system, SCADA system, HMI system, integration project, or a combination of these, will have: requirements, designs, test plans, test cases, common libraries, documentation and coding standards, and other project artifacts. The project artifacts still have value because they represent the intellectual capital invested in the project that can be captured and made available for future projects.

Typically, most project artifacts are kept only on desktop systems. At some stage in the project, these artifacts are copied to the target system or to a configuration management system. This is a risky approach because information will then be lost when the project is stopped. This is especially true if the project work is performed by contractors. As they will start looking for the next consulting opportunity once the announcement is made that the project is cancelled. Getting their attention and time to correctly document and save all of their work will be difficult, if even possible. For many projects, once the announcement is made, all outside contractors will be off the site by the end of the day.

The best rule for any project is to capture all project artifacts in common storage and, if possible, place the artifacts in a controlled configuration management system. If you are following the approach of engineers and programmers working in a local sandbox with daily check-in of work and multiple shared versions (daily build, distributed beta, final test, and final build), then you will have all of the artifacts captured.

Capturing folded project artifacts allows you to reuse those artifacts on future projects. For example, most requirements are well reviewed and agreed-to documents and these requirements may still be valid on the next project. Many of the non-functional requirements, such as performance, up-time, and security, may not significantly change from project to project.

Other examples of reusable artifacts include: error handling methods, event logging methods, standard HMI faceplates, standard control module elements (PLC or DCS code), standard interfaces, test strategies, test frameworks, test cases, and standard templates for requirements, code, and tests. Each of these artifacts may have their own requirements, design documents, and code. These documents should be added to a knowledge base and made available to future project teams.

Another important action to take when stopping a project is to generate a set of lessons learned documents. Each document should define a single aspect of the project and if it was completed above, at, or below expectations.

When something worked really well, identify the participants so they can be called in on future projects to share their knowledge. When something did not work, don't identify the participants because the goal of the documents is not to assign blame. Instead when identifying something that did not work, document why it didn't work, what the early symptoms were, and what could be tried instead.

In poker it's important to know when to hold 'em and know when to fold 'em. For manufacturing IT projects, it's also important to know how to fold 'em.

Author information : Dennis Brandl is president of BR&L Consulting in Cary, NC, www.brlconsulting.com. His firm focuses on manufacturing IT. Contact Dennis at dbrandl@brlconsulting.com.

 





The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
Pipe fabrication and IIoT; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
The future of electrical safety; Four keys to RPM success; Picking the right weld fume option
A new approach to the Skills Gap; Community colleges may hold the key for manufacturing; 2017 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Control room technology innovation; Practical approaches to corrosion protection; Pipeline regulator revises quality programs
The cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Infrastructure for natural gas expansion; Artificial lift methods; Disruptive technology and fugitive gas emissions
Power system design for high-performance buildings; mitigating arc flash hazards
VFDs improving motion control applications; Powering automation and IIoT wirelessly; Connecting the dots
Natural gas engines; New applications for fuel cells; Large engines become more efficient; Extending boiler life

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me