Controlling and containing arc flash with maintenance, technology

Brent Henry, director of marketing for power distribution and control assemblies at Eaton, talks with Plant Engineering about the continuing issues around arc flash and how plant managers can address these issues.

03/21/2018


Eaton’s Arc Quenching Switchgear eliminates the tradeoffs between protecting equipment and providing enhanced safety. Courtesy: Eaton.Plant Engineering (PE): Talk about the arc flash issue itself. We’ve been concerned about arc flash for decades, and we still have many arc flash incidents every day. Why?

Henry: First, it’s worth noting that arc flash events do not occur spontaneously in electrical equipment. They result from factors that can, for the most part, be controlled—correct installation, environment, regular maintenance, proper maintenance practices, and protecting the switchgear from foreign matter such as conductive dust, moisture, and rodents. 

That said, arc flash continues to be a concern in the industry, and enhancing safety in the workplace continues to be critical. When regular, proper maintenance of electrical equipment is not performed, the risk of arc flash increases; with limited resources, there are competing priorities between expanding production, maintaining existing equipment, and replacing outdated equipment. Furthermore, installing or retrofitting equipment with the latest arc flash safety technology can strain budgets. 

Second, I think it’s fair to say that many arc flash safety solutions available today present tradeoffs, which can make the buying decision difficult. The least expensive solutions tend to have the least effect on reducing risk, potentially leaving equipment vulnerable to arc flash damage and having little impact on safety. Other, more expensive solutions may enhance safety but may not protect the electrical equipment from damage. For example, arc-resistant gear is designed to redirect arc energy away from personnel, but the equipment itself would still sustain internal damage from arc faults, which could take months to repair or replace.  

PE: How has technology adapted to the arc flash issue to date? Can you talk about the progress safety officials have made in recent years?

Henry: Broadly speaking, electrical equipment manufacturers have approached the issue of arc flash safety from two angles. The first is arc flash containment. Since safety is the number one priority for every organization, the thinking goes, a product that can redirect the arc energy away from the user, regardless of what occurs internally to the equipment, was a gigantic step forward. And that is the philosophy behind arc-resistant equipment. When all the doors are closed and latched and panels are in place, arc-resistant equipment contains and redirects the energy from an arc blast away from the user. Arc-resistant equipment enhances personnel safety, but often there is catastrophic internal damage to the equipment.

Manufacturers also have looked to reduce incident energy to address arc flash safety. Incident energy is the amount of energy, at a prescribed distance from the equipment, generated during an electrical arc event. It increases as available fault current and clearing time increase. So manufacturers have developed products that are capable of quickly detecting and clearing arc faults inside electrical equipment. The faster a given product clears the fault, the lower the incident energy will be, the less the equipment will be damaged and the safer it will be. Unfortunately, in many cases, these products have effectively hit a wall in terms of how quickly they can clear an arcing fault. This is because many incident energy reducing technologies rely on opening an upstream over current protective device to clear the fault. Power circuit breakers, such as those found in low-voltage switchgear, can take up to four cycles or 67 milliseconds to clear a fault after receiving a trip signal. This means that no matter how quickly an arc flash can be detected, it will take a few additional cycles to actually clear the fault. This creates a lower bound for the incident energy. Attempts to reduce it further require utilizing a device that can act faster than a power circuit breaker. 

In power systems with higher available fault current, multi-cycle clearing times can result in unacceptably high levels of incident energy, which can require special PPE and can fail to prevent extensive equipment damage and process downtime. 

PE: Why is Arc Quenching Magnum DS Switchgear different?

Henry: Eaton’s Arc Quenching Switchgear eliminates the tradeoffs between protecting equipment and providing enhanced safety. Arc Quenching Switchgear relies on a specially designed current limiting Arc Quenching Device, which can transfer and contain an arcing fault in less than one quarter of a cycle, or less than 4 milliseconds. By reducing the clearing time by a factor of 10, the incident energy is also reduced by an order of magnitude. This means that with 85,000 A of available fault current at 480 V, the incident energy will be well below the 1.2 cal/cm2 threshold for which second degree burns occur. 

When the Arc Quenching Device receives a trigger signal from the Eaton Arc Flash Relay, it produces a lower impedance arc in a contained micro-environment within the Arc Containment Vessels located in the Arc Quenching Device. The lower impedance arc collapses the voltage and immediately extinguishes the unintended arcing fault as the current begins to flow into the Arc Quenching Device. This quenching operation occurs in less than 4 milliseconds. The arcing continues safely contained inside the AQD until the upstream power circuit breaker trips.

PE: Equipment damage and the resulting downtime is one concern from an arc flash incident. How does Arc Quenching Magnum DS Switchgear address this issue?

Henry: All of the benefits of Arc Quenching Switchgear stem from its incredibly fast arc quenching time, which results in dramatically reduced incident energy. The incident energy is reduced to such a low level that Arc Quenching Switchgear can pass the ANSI/IEEE C37.20.7 arc-resistant test guide in standard NEMA 1 construction, without the need for ducts, plenums, thicker gage steel, or any of the other enclosure reinforcements used in traditional arc-resistant equipment. And Arc Quenching Switchgear can exceed the protection provided by traditional arc-resistant equipment by passing the C37.20.7 test guide even when doors are open or panels and breakers are removed.

In fact, the incident energy is reduced to such a low level that damage to the switchgear is minimized or completely eliminated. So this means that the expensive switchgear assets are protected from damage and that downtime from an arc flash event can be drastically reduced, since minimal or no repairs will be necessary to bring the switchgear back on line. Recovery from an arc flash event used to consist of replacing the damaged switchgear

PE: What more should manufacturers do to prevent arc flash incidents?

Henry: Manufacturers need to continue to drive innovation in the field of arc flash safety to advance safety and protect equipment and processes. Furthermore, it’s critical that the most effective technologies to enhance safety and operational reliability are implemented and we participate in various industry organizations and standards committees to advance the adoption of the most effective solutions. Additionally, we must work closely with engineering consultants and our customers to advance safety where we work and in our homes so that the technology that meets the highest standards is specified and becomes standard. 

Always remember to never work on energized equipment!

ONLINE extra

Learn more about the Arc Quenching Magnum DS Switchgear below.

 



Top Plant
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2017 Top Plant.
Product of the Year
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
System Integrator of the Year
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
May 2018
Electrical standards, robots and Lean manufacturing, and how an aluminum packaging plant is helping community growth.
April 2018
2017 Product of the Year winners, retrofitting a press, IMTS and Hannover Messe preview, natural refrigerants, testing steam traps
March 2018
SCCR, 2018 Maintenance study, and VFDs in a washdown environment.
April 2018
ROVs, rigs, and the real time; wellsite valve manifolds; AI on a chip; analytics use for pipelines
February 2018
Focus on power systems, process safety, electrical and power systems, edge computing in the oil & gas industry
December 2017
Product of the Year winners, Pattern recognition, Engineering analytics, Revitalize older pump installations
Spring 2018
Burners for heat-treating furnaces, CHP, dryers, gas humidification, and more
April 2018
Implementing a DCS, stepper motors, intelligent motion control, remote monitoring of irrigation systems
February 2018
Setting internal automation standards

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

The Maintenance and Reliability Coach's blog
Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
One Voice for Manufacturing
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Maintenance and Reliability Professionals Blog
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Machine Safety
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
Research Analyst Blog
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Marshall on Maintenance
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
Lachance on CMMS
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
Maintenance & Safety
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
Industrial Analytics
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
IIoT: Operations & IT
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Randy Steele
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Matthew J. Woo, PE, RCDD, LEED AP BD+C
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Randy Oliver
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
Data Centers: Impacts of Climate and Cooling Technology
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
Safety First: Arc Flash 101
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
Critical Power: Hospital Electrical Systems
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me