Basics of belt drives

Power transmission belting has been used for more than 200 years. The first belts were flat and ran on flat pulleys. Later, cotton or hemp rope was used with V-groove pulleys to reduce belt tension. This led to the development of the vulcanized rubber V-belt in 1917. The need to eliminate speed variations led to the development of synchronous or toothed belts about 1950 and the later deve...


Key concepts
For long life, select the belt type best suited for the application.
There are three basic types of power transmission belting: flat, V, and synchronous.
Misalignment is a common cause of premature belt failure.
Belt types
Belt drive advantages
Belt drive disadvantages

Power transmission belting has been used for more than 200 years. The first belts were flat and ran on flat pulleys. Later, cotton or hemp rope was used with V-groove pulleys to reduce belt tension. This led to the development of the vulcanized rubber V-belt in 1917. The need to eliminate speed variations led to the development of synchronous or toothed belts about 1950 and the later development of fabric-reinforced elastomer materials.

Today, flat, V, and synchronous belting is still being used in power transmission. When compared to other forms of power transmission, belts provide a good combination of flexibility, low cost, simple installation and maintenance, and minimal space requirements.

Belt-driven equipment uses readily available components. Replacement parts can be easily obtained from local distributors. This availability reduces downtime and inventory. Sheaves and pulleys are usually less expensive than chain drive sprockets and have little wear over long periods of operation.

Belt types

All power transmission belts are either friction drive or positive drive. Friction drive belts rely on the friction between the belt and pulley to transmit power. They require tension to maintain the right amount of friction. Flat belts are the purest form of friction drive while V-belts have a friction multiplying effect because of wedging action on the pulley.

Positive drive or synchronous belts rely on the engagement of teeth on the belt with grooves on the pulley. There is no slip with this belt except for ratcheting or tooth jumping.

Flat belts

Modern flat belts are made with reinforced, rubberized fabric that provides strength and high friction levels with the pulley (Fig. 1). This eliminates the need for high tension, lowering shaft and bearing loads. Flat belts can transmit up to 150 hp/in. at speeds exceeding 20,000 fpm.

Fig. 1. Flat belts have thin cross-sections and wrap around pulleys easily

A significant advantage of flat belts is efficiency of nearly 99%, about 2.5-3% better than V-belts. Good efficiency is due to lower bending losses from a thin cross-section, low creep because of friction covers and high modulus of elasticity traction layers, and no wedging action into pulleys.

Pulley alignment is important to flat belts. Belt tracking is improved by crowning at least one pulley, usually the larger one. Flat belts are forgiving of misalignment; however, proper alignment improves belt life.

Different flat belt surface patterns serve various transmission requirements. In high-horsepower applications and outdoor installations, longitudinal grooves in the belt surface reduce the air cushion flat belts generate. The air cushion reduces friction between the pulley and belt. The grooves nearly eliminate the effects of dirt, dust, oil, and grease and help reduce the noise level.

Flat belts operate most efficiently on drives with speeds above 3000 fpm. Continuous, smooth-running applications are preferred. Speed ratios usually should not exceed 6:1. At higher ratios, longer center distances or idlers placed on the slack side of the belt create more wrap around the smaller pulley to transmit the required load.


Fig. 2. V-belts come in

V-belts are commonly used in industrial applications because of their relative low cost, ease of installation, and wide range of sizes (Fig. 2). The V-shape makes it easier to keep fast-moving belts in sheave grooves than it is to keep a flat belt on a pulley. The biggest operational advantage of a V-belt is the wedging action into the sheave groove. This geometry multiplies the low tensioning force to increase friction force on the pulley sidewalls (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Classical V-belts are frequently used individually, particularly in A and B sizes. The larger C, D, and E sizes generally are not used in single-belt drives because of cost penalties and inefficiencies. Multiple A or B belts are economical alternatives to using single-belt C, D, or E sections.

Narrow V-belts, for a given width, offer higher power ratings than conventional V-belts. They have a greater depth-to-width ratio, placing more of the sheave under the reinforcing cord. These belts are suited for severe duty applications, including shock and high starting loads.

Banded V-belts solve problems conventional multiple V-belt drives have with pulsating loads. The intermittent forces can induce a whipping action in multiple-belt systems, sometimes causing belts to turn over. The joined configuration avoids the need to order multiple belts as matched sets.

Banded V-belts should not be mounted on deep-groove sheaves, which are used to avoid turnover in standard V-belts. Such sheaves have the potential for cutting the band of joined belts. Extremely worn sheaves produce the same result.

V-ribbed belts combine some of the best features of flat belts and V-belts. The thin belt operates efficiently and can run at high speeds. Tensioning requirements are about 20% higher than V-belts. The ribs ensure the belt tracks properly, making alignment less critical than it is for flat belts.

Synchronous belts

Synchronous belts have a toothed profile that mates with corresponding grooves in the pulleys, providing the same positive engagement as gears or chains. They are used in applications where indexing, positioning, or a constant speed ratio is required.

The first tooth profile used on synchronous belts was the trapezoidal shape (Fig. 4). It is still recognized as standard. Recent modifications to tooth profiles have improved on the original shape. The full-rounded profile distributes tooth loads better to the belt tension members. It also provides greater tooth shear strength for improved load capacity.

Fig. 4. Synchronous belts have several tooth shapes

A modified curvilinear tooth design has a different pressure angle, tooth depth, and materials for improved load/li fe capacity and nonratcheting resistance.

Synchronous belts can wear rapidly if pulleys are not aligned properly, especially in long-center-distance drives, where belts tend to rub against pulley flanges. To prevent the belt from riding off the pulleys, one of them is usually flanged. A recent development has produced a belt and pulley that use a V-shaped, instead of straight, tooth shape. It runs quieter than the other shapes and doesn't require pulley flanges.

Undertensioning causes performance problems. The drive may be noisy because belt teeth do not mate properly with pulley grooves or the belt may prematurely wear from ratcheting. High forces generated during belt ratcheting are transmitted directly to shafts and bearings and can cause damage.

Link belts

Link-type V-belts consist of removable links that are joined to adjacent links by shaped ends twisted through the next link (Fig. 5). With this design, belts can be made up of any length, reducing inventory. The belts are available in 3L, A/4L, B, C, and D widths in lengths from 5 to 100 ft.

Fig. 5. Link-type belts are used to make instant V-belt replacements

These belts can transmit the same horsepower as classic V-belts. The links are made of plies of polyester fabric and polyurethane that resist heat, oil, water, and many chemicals.

Advantages of link belts include quickly making up matched sets, fast installation because machinery doesn't have to be disassembled, and vibration dampening.

Disadvantages include cost and the possible generation of static charges. The belt should be grounded when used in high-dust applications.


Misalignment is one of the most common causes of premature belt failure (Fig. 6). The problem gradually reduces belt performance by increasing wear and fatigue. Depending on severity, misalignment can destroy a belt in a matter of hours. Sheave misalignment on V-belt drives should not exceed 1/2 deg. or 1/10 -in. of center distance. For synchronous belts it should not exceed 1/4 deg. or 1/16-in. of center distance.

Fig. 6. Improper drive maintenance is the biggest source of belt drive problems

Angular misalignment (Fig. 7) results in accelerated belt/sheave wear and potential stability problems with individual V-belts. A related problem, uneven belt and cord loading, results in unequal load sharing with multiple belt drives and leads to premature failure.

Angular misalignment has a severe effect on synchronous belt drives. Symptoms such as high belt tracking forces, uneven tooth/land wear, edge wear, high noise levels, and potential failure due to uneven cord loading are possible. Wide belts are more sensitive to angular misalignment than narrow belts.

Fig. 7. Misalignment causes belt wear, noise and excessive temperatures

Parallel misalignment also results in accelerated belt/sheave wear and potential stability problems with individual belts. Uneven belt and cord loading is not as significant a concern as with angular misalignment.

Parallel misalignment is typically more of a concern with V-belts. They run in fixed grooves and cannot free float between flanges to a limited degree as synchronous belts can. Parallel misalignment is generally not a critical concern with synchronous belts as long as the belt is not trapped or pinched between opposite sprocket flanges and tracks completely on both sprockets.


Total tension required in a belt drive depends on the type of belt, the design horsepower, and the drive rpm. Since running tensions cannot be measured, it is necessary to tension a drive statically.

The force/deflection method is most often used. Once a calculated force is applied to the center of a belt span to obtain a known deflection, the recommended static tension is established. Most design catalogs provide force and deflection formulas.

With too little tension in a V-belt drive, slippage can occur and lead to spin burns, cover wear, overheating of the belt, and possibly overheating of bearings. Not enough tension in a synchronous belt causes premature tooth wear or possible ratcheting that will destroy the belt and could break a shaft.

When installing a new belt, installation tension should be set higher. Generally 1.4-1.5 times the normal static tension. This is necessary because drive tension drops rapidly during the seating-in process. This extra initial tension does not affect bearings because it decays rapidly.

Plant Engineering magazine extends its appreciation to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. for its cooperation in making the cover photo possible.

Belt application matrix

ApplicationSynchronous beltV-beltV-ribbed belt
PolyurethaneRubberDouble-sidedHeavy- dutyLight-dutyPolyurethane
High speed2211
Low speed1123
High load12433
Low load12344
Shock/impulse load3412
Serpentine drive1
Serpentine drive w/ shock load2
Twisted drive123
Clutching drive12
Index drive w/high load1
Index drive w/low load12
Drive characteristics
Reversing direction11342
Frequent start/stop11342
Start under load123
Smooth running3211
Variable speed1
Oil, chemical environment1342
High temperature12443
Low temperature1234
1=First choice, 4=Last choice Chart courtesy The Gates Rubber Co.

Troubleshooting V-belt drives

Belt stretch beyond take-up
Belts stretch unequallyMisaligned drive overloading some belts. Belt tensile member broken from improper installationRealign and retension drive. Replace with a new, matched set, properly installed
All belts stretched equallyInsufficient take-up allowanceCheck take-up and follow recommended allowance
Greatly overloaded or under-tensioned driveRedesign drive
Short belt life
Rapid belt failureTensile members damaged from improper installationReplace with new, matched set, properly installed
Worn sheave groovesReplace sheaves
Under-designed driveRedesign drive
Belt sidewalls soft and sticky. Low adhesion between cover, plies. Cross section swollenOil or grease contamination of belt/sheaveRemove source of oil or grease. Clean belts and sheave grooves cloth moistened with nonflammable, non-toxic degreasing agent or commercial detergent and water
Belt sidewalls dry and hard.High-temperature environmentRemove source of heat
Low adhesion between cover and pliesVentilate drive
Deterioration of belt's rubber compoundsBelt dressingNever use dressing on rubber V-belts. Clean belts and sheave grooves cloth moistened with nonflammable, non- toxic degreasing agent or commercial detergent and water. Tension drive properly to prevent slip
Extreme cover wearBelts rubbing against belt guard or other obstructionRemove obstruction or align belts to provide proper clearance
Spin burns on beltBelts slip on starting or load stallsRetension drive
Bottom of belt crackedSheaves too smallRedesign drive for larger sheaves
Broken beltsObject falling into or hitting driveReplace with new, matched set of belts
Belt turnover
Excess lateral belt whipUse banded belt
Foreign material in sheave groovesRemove material. Shield drive
Misaligned driveRealign drive
Worn sheave groovesReplace sheaves
Tensile member broken from improper installationReplace belts with new, matched set, properly installed
Incorrectly placed idler pulleyCarefully align idler pulley on slack side of drive, as close as possible to driver sheave
Belt noise
Belt slipRetension drive
Improper driven speed
Incorrect driver/driven ratioDesign errorChange sheaves
Hot bearings
Drive overtensionedWorn sheave grooves. Belts bottom out and can't transmit power unless overtensionedReplace sheaves. Tension drive properly
Improper tensionRetension drive
Sheaves too smallMotor/belt manufacturer's recommendations not followedRedesign drive
Bearing wearUnderdesigned bearings or poor bearing maintenanceObserve recommended design and maintenance
Drive undertensionedBelts slip and cause heat buildupRetension drive

Power transmission belting manufacturers
The following companies provided input for this article by responding to a written request from Plant Engineering magazine. For more information on their product lines, circle the number on the Reader Service Card or visit their web site.

CircleCompanyBelt typeHorsepower rangeSpeed range, fpmMax. length, in.
221Fenner DrivesV1/16—6275—600none
Linkvaries by application
222Emerson PowerV1.3—9251000—6500450
223The Gates Rubber Co.V0.1—10001—20,000663
224Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.V0—10000—10,000900
226Shingle Belting Co.V4—161000—5000open
225Stock Drive Products/Sterling Instr.V0.1—4.5500—12,000 rpm32.5
sdp-si.comSynchronous0.01—188000—25,000 rpm149.6
Flat0.04—0.22000—20,000 rpm19.7

Belt drive advantages



Absorbs shock loads

Wide selection of speed ratios

Can provide variable speeds

Quiet operation

Efficiency over 95%

Transmits power between widely spaced shafts

Visual warning of failure

Belt drive disadvantages

Need to retension periodically

Deterioration from exposure to lubricants or chemicals

Cannot be repaired, must be replaced

Top Plant
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America.
Product of the Year
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
System Integrator of the Year
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
November 2018
2018 Product of the Year finalists, mild steel welding: finding the right filler, and new technique joins aluminum to steel.
October 2018
Tools vs. sensors, functional safety, compressor rental, an operational network of maintenance and safety
September 2018
2018 Engineering Leaders under 40, Women in Engineering, Six ways to reduce waste in manufacturing, and Four robot implementation challenges.
October 2018
2018 Product of the Year; Subsurface data methodologies; Digital twins; Well lifecycle data
August 2018
SCADA standardization, capital expenditures, data-driven drilling and execution
June 2018
Machine learning, produced water benefits, programming cavity pumps
Summer 2018
Microgrids and universities, Steam traps and energy efficiency, Finding help with energy projects
October 2018
Complex upgrades for system integrators; Process control safety and compliance
November 2018
Analytics quantify processes, Fieldbus networking and IIoT, Choosing the right accelerometer

Annual Salary Survey

After two years of economic concerns, manufacturing leaders once again have homed in on the single biggest issue facing their operations:

It's the workers—or more specifically, the lack of workers.

The 2017 Plant Engineering Salary Survey looks at not just what plant managers make, but what they think. As they look across their plants today, plant managers say they don’t have the operational depth to take on the new technologies and new challenges of global manufacturing.

Read more: 2017 Salary Survey

The Maintenance and Reliability Coach's blog
Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
One Voice for Manufacturing
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Maintenance and Reliability Professionals Blog
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Machine Safety
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
Research Analyst Blog
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Marshall on Maintenance
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
Lachance on CMMS
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
Material Handling
This digital report explains how everything from conveyors and robots to automatic picking systems and digital orders have evolved to keep pace with the speed of change in the supply chain.
Electrical Safety Update
This digital report explains how plant engineers need to take greater care when it comes to electrical safety incidents on the plant floor.
IIoT: Machines, Equipment, & Asset Management
Articles in this digital report highlight technologies that enable Industrial Internet of Things, IIoT-related products and strategies.
Randy Steele
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Matthew J. Woo, PE, RCDD, LEED AP BD+C
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Randy Oliver
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
Data Centers: Impacts of Climate and Cooling Technology
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
Safety First: Arc Flash 101
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
Critical Power: Hospital Electrical Systems
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
Design of Safe and Reliable Hydraulic Systems for Subsea Applications
This eGuide explains how the operation of hydraulic systems for subsea applications requires the user to consider additional aspects because of the unique conditions that apply to the setting
click me