Signs of hope for manufacturing amid COVID-19
While manufacturing has been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic, there are signs and reasons to be optimistic about a recovery in the months and years to come.
The COVID-19 pandemic has delivered a gut punch to American manufacturing. The picture, while grim, is by no means the catastrophe of our worst fears. Factories have idled or slowed production to allow deep cleaning and to protect workers. Supply chains have been disrupted. Shortages of products from medical supplies to, yes, toilet paper are the stuff of headlines.
However, U.S. manufacturers have been swift to respond. Many manufacturers are switching production from their usual product lines to turn out badly needed medical supplies. Workarounds are being found for disrupted supply chains. Factories are figuring out how to keep their people safe while still producing what the market needs.
And with Congress and President Donald Trump now agreeing on an economic rescue effort, money will soon be available to both small businesses and larger industrial operations to see them through the crisis. The agreed relief package agreed would send $1,200 checks to many Americans, create a $367 billion loan program for small businesses, and establish a $500 billion lending fund for industries, cities and states. Trump has committed to signing the legislation.
What follows is a quick survey of the state of manufacturing as the coronavirus crisis puts more and more parts of American life on hold.
The latest numbers
A newly released survey of manufacturing leaders conducted by the National Association of Manufacturers hints at the level of disruption as the situation unfolds. In the survey, which was in the field from Feb. 28 to March 9, 78.3% of respondents say that the COVID-19 outbreak was likely to have a financial impact on their businesses; 53.1% of manufacturers were anticipating a change in their operations in the coming months; and 35.5% said that they were already facing supply chain disruptions.
The numbers presumably will look even more dire as the crisis deepens, although hard numbers are difficult to come by yet. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, an intergovernmental economic body with 36 member countries, predicted this month that economic growth among its members will slow this year from the previous forecast of 2.9% to $2.4% — down but remaining positive.
In response to the crisis, NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons called on Congress to enact a sweeping agenda of steps to keep the factories humming. Besides a relief package, NAM also suggests a designation of manufacturers as “essential” to ensure the supply of critical products; incentives for airlines to expand cargo capacity and prioritizing medical cargo on both passenger and cargo flights; and many other measures.
The impact on supply chains could exacerbate problems already there because of trade and tariff disputes with China. Reaction to the virus, particularly in China where much industry faced shutdowns for a time, is likely to lead to yet more steps to diversity U.S. manufacturers’ supply chains to build more resiliencies into the system.
With the crisis relatively new and still developing, opinions vary as to how bad the impact on manufacturers will get. But University of Michigan economist Don Grimes says the nation’s producers may weather this crisis somewhat better than the collapse of the Great Recession of 10-12 years ago, especially if the current abrupt work stoppages don’t last that long.
“We might get a little better rebound in manufacturing and autos this time than we did (last time) because, at least under the better scenario, it’s not going to wipe out so much permanent wealth of people,” he said. “They’ll lose income for a month or two, but they’ll presumably begin to get it back as opposed to the much more severe effect 10 years ago.”
Grimes said the nation is in much better shape to weather this crisis than in 2008, when the financial markets imploded and dragged down everyone with them.
During the Great Recession, he noted, “People were just a lot poorer. People could not get credit. People had defaulted on their loans. Credit got really tight. You don’t expect to see that similar reaction by the financial institutions this time. The financial institutions themselves are in much better shape. They have much more reserves. You shouldn’t see the financial institutions going under like you did. Unless this thing drags on for years we’re in a better situation particularly from the financial backstop than we were 10 years ago.”
A problem, of course, is the uncertainty over how long the crisis lasts makes forecasting all but impossible, said Charles Ballard, professor of economics at Michigan State University.
“If it’s weeks or a small number of months then the first and second quarters of this year will have noticeable damage in the economic data but by fall we’ll feel like things are semi-normal again,” Ballard said. “But if it takes multiple months before things can get back going, the longer this goes the harder it gets.”
Signs of hope
Even as the crisis deepens, there were more hopeful signs beginning to emerge from the gloom. Among them:
- Besides the new federal bailout, the U.S. Federal Reserve has already committed to “continue to use its full range of tools to support the flow of credit to households and businesses” in the U.S.
- China’s industrial output fell by 13.5% in the first two months of this year, and both supply-chain problems and consumers staying out of dealerships disrupted auto sales there. But things appear to be easing there.
- German engineering giant Siemens’s factories in China are almost back to normal operation, Chief Executive Joe Kaeser told the media late last week in Zurich. News service Reuters reported that Kaeser said Siemen’s factories in China are now running at 95% of their pre-outbreak levels. All but two of Siemens’ factories globally were open, he said.
- Bloomberg Economics, meanwhile, estimated that Chinese factories in general were operating at 60 to 70% capacity last week – not ideal, certainly, but far from a total shutdown.
- Just as the U.S. auto industry became the “Arsenal of Democracy” in World War II, producing tanks and warplanes instead of cars and trucks, the industry this month has adopted the term “Arsenal of Health” to reflect how motor vehicle manufacturers from General Motors down to third-tier parts suppliers are turning idle factories into producers of needed medical supplies. To cite just one: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles CEO Mike Manley told employees over the weekend that one of the company’s plants in Asia would be converted to produce facemasks for health care workers and quickly reach a target of 1 million masks per month.
- 3M Corp. said last week that it continues to manufacture needed products in multiple areas around the world, including in the United States and China, as well as in Latin America, Europe and Asia. 3M’s manufacturing model emphasizes “local for local,” meaning most of its products made in a country are sold there. Most 3M products sold in the United States are made in the U.S. 3M’s Aberdeen, South Dakota plant is running around the clock to produce the much-needed N95 respirator masks. The company quoted Tim Hofer, a machine operator in Aberdeen, saying, “We know what we have to do, we know we need to keep our numbers up, we know we need to keep ourselves safe, and we need to put out great quality. And that’s what we’ve come here to do.” 3M said it manufactures millions of respirators per month at its production facilities and will continue to do that as demand is expected to outpace supply for the foreseeable future.
- A spokesperson from Procter & Gamble, the Cincinnati-based parent company behind Charmin toilet paper, Bounty paper towels and Puffs facial tissue, told Forbes that the company is producing those products in U.S. plants at record-high levels.
- And International Paper CEO Mark Sutton told CNBC on Friday that its pipelines for diaper materials and pulp used by tissue and paper workers are “running wide open.”
Indeed, the panic buying of toilet paper – probably one of the stranger facets of the coronavirus crisis – doesn’t reflect the reality of ample supplies in the pipeline. Once shelves are restocked with toilet paper, one analyst quipped, “Nobody is going to buy it, because who needs to buy toilet paper when you got a year’s worth sitting in your garage.”
And while the slowdown in vehicle sales and other output will be painful, the downturn may not look as bad as in past recessionary periods. This month, Morgan Stanley forecast that U.S. vehicle sales would drop 9% this year to 15.5 million units, down from 17.1 million in 2019. As painful as that may be, it would be easier to bear than the plunge in sales during the Great Recession, when annual vehicle sales dropped to about 9 million.
That sales drop of a decade ago proved especially dire for factory-dependent Michigan, where total manufacturing output slid 25% from 2007 to 2010. It took several years to grow back to previous highs.
Keep calm and carry on
Much uncertainty remains and U.S. manufacturers are still going into this crisis rather than beginning to emerge from the far end of it. But suffice it to say that this crisis will end, sooner or later, and then manufacturers will take the lessons they’ve learned and use them to be that much more ready for the next one.
“We live in highly unusual times,” Grimes said. “When we get done with this, we’ll all have great stories to tell about how we lived through this age of the virus.”
John Gallagher is contributing editor for the Robotic Industries Association (RIA) and Robotics Online. RIA is a not-for-profit trade association dedicated to improving the regional, national, and global competitiveness of the North American manufacturing and service sectors through robotics and related automation. This article originally appeared on the RIA website. The RIA is a part of the Association for Advancing Automation (A3), a CFE Media content partner. Edited by Chris Vavra, associate editor, Control Engineering, CFE Media & Technology, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Original content can be found at Control Engineering.