Wireless LAN for industrial applications
Back to Basics: What are the differences between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz wireless LAN in industrial applications?
As the use of wireless technologies is increasing in the process and manufacturing industry, so is the installed base of IEEE 802.11b/g/n products that operate in the worldwide free 2.4 GHz ISM band. Besides Wireless LAN IEEE 802.11b/g/n, other wireless technologies like Bluetooth technology, IEEE 802.15.4/ ZigBee/Wireless HART, and several proprietary technologies operate in the 2.4 GHz band. With so many technologies crowding the same frequency band, interference problems can occur. To ensure that industrial wireless solutions are robust, there are basically two solutions:
- Carry through extensive frequency planning and use special antenna solutions (like leakage cables) in the industrial 2.4 GHz setting, or
- Use the 2.4 GHz band for office and IT communication and 5 GHz band for manufacturing and machine to machine (M2M) communications.
Differences: Channels, usage
The Wireless LAN IEEE 802.11b/g radios use the 2.4 GHz frequency band (2.412–2.472 GHz) and the IEEE 802.11a radio uses the 5 GHz frequency band (5.180–5.825 GHz). IEEE 802.11n radios can operate in either frequency band. There are the following worldwide implementation attributes:
- The 2.4 GHz ISM band provides 13 overlapping channels spread equally over the frequencies plus a 14th channel used in Japan with the center frequency 2.484 GHz. This leaves available only three non-overlapping channels in the 2.4 GHz band. To avoid interferences between the Wireless LAN connected devices, these channels have to be used very efficiently. Installation requires careful frequency planning or expensive installation of solutions such as leakage cables. In other words, installation costs can easily become higher than the actual wireless equipment installed.
- The 5 GHz ISM band is divided into sub-bands called U-NII bands (Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure) and are usually named U-NII-1, U-NII-2, U-NII-2e, and U-NII-3; U-NII-3 is not freely available worldwide. In total, this gives 23 non-overlapping channels, four of which have limitations based on location.*
Today, most available Wireless LAN solutions in the 5 GHz band use the U-NII-1 band (5.18-5.24 GHz) with frequency channels 36-48. However, there are also some suppliers that have extended the range to include the U-NII-2/2e band (5.26-5.70 GHz) with frequency channels 52-140.
Pros and cons of each standard
Wireless LAN IEEE 802.11b/g/n is already well established with its huge installed base and a wide range of products made available. Besides its wide use, the 2.4 GHz band offers the advantage of operating in a worldwide available ISM band. Further, the achieved range using the same output power is better on 2.4 GHz compared to radios using the higher frequency 5 GHz band.
The entire 5 GHz ISM band is not available for use worldwide. Further, availability of components and products is still somewhat limited compared to the 2.4 GHz band.
The greatest strength of the 5 GHz band is the availability of 23* non-overlapping channels; 20* more channels than those available in the 2.4 GHz band. Since no other wireless technology “fights” for the radio space, the 23* available non-overlapping channels can provide a possibility for easier planning of an interference-free and stabile wireless communication. Another advantage of the 5 GHz band is that the greater number of available channels provides for increased density, which means that more wireless devices can be connected in the same radio environment.
Radar detection, DFS
The use of Wireless LAN in the U-NII-2/2e bands (channel 52 -140, frequency range 5.260–5.725 GHz) requires radar detection. Within the operation context of the dynamic frequency selection (DFS) function, a device shall operate as either a master or a slave. The requirements for a slave device, which is typically a client in an infrastructure, are:
- A slave device shall not transmit data before receiving an appropriate enabling signal from a master device.
- A slave device shall stop all its data transmissions whenever instructed by a master device.
- Devices operating as a slave shall only operate in a network controlled by a device operating as a master.
Requirements for a master device, which is typically an access point or a master in an ad-hoc mode network, differ from the requirements for a slave device. The requirements for a master device are:
- A master device shall detect radar signals.
- A master device shall only start operations on available channels.
- During normal operation, a master device shall monitor the operating channel (in-service monitoring).
- If a master device has detected a radar signal during in-service monitoring, the master device shall instruct all its associated slave devices to stop transmitting on this channel.
Some devices are capable of communicating in an ad-hoc manner without being attached to a network. Ad-hoc devices form a point-to-point communication channel, with one of the devices taking the role of master and therefore taking on the requirement for DFS and all of the applicable requirements for a master.
Range and performance, 2 and 5 GHz
The radio wavelength in the 5 GHz band is half of the wavelength in the 2.4 GHz band. And as a consequence, a radio module using the 5 GHz band will have a narrower range than a radio operating on the 2.4 GHz band using the same output power. How much less the range will be is hard to predict as it depends on the radio conditions at the location in consideration. Further, diverse materials absorb frequencies differently, which also affects the range dramatically.
To learn the exact range, the solution has to be tested live.
Tests in factories in the 5 GHz band have shown that the range can be 50 meters to 100 meters in free line-of-sight. Obstacles, interference, materials, and use of large data packages can decrease the range substantially.
5 GHz offers advantages
By using the 5 GHz band for Wireless LAN communication, a number of advantages and cost decreases can be achieved. By adding 23* possible Wireless LAN channels, frequency planning, density (the number of active wireless devices within the radio coverage space), and the installation complexity can be dramatically improved. An extra bonus of using 5 GHz is that the 2.4 GHz band becomes available for other radio technologies.
These advantages together with increasing availability of 5 GHz industrial products will increase the use of the 5 GHz band greatly in the near future. Up till now, 5 GHz use in industrial applications has been more or less limited to products, such as smaller access points and small compact clients (based on the same platforms as the access points). Already available on the market are OEM wireless modules for integration in various industrial products as well as serial Wireless LAN clients for integration of smaller devices and existing serial communication based products.
* For FCC channels 120–132, use is restricted near airports due to the interference risk of the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) (ref. FCC KDB 443999). Canada requires a restriction on the channels 120–128.
About connectBlue - connectBlue provides robust industrial and medical wireless solutions, designed and tested for the most demanding applications and environments. Based on Bluetooth technology, Wireless LAN (WLAN), and IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee, connectBlue provides ready-to-use products and modules as well as custom design solutions. connectBlue has its head office in Sweden and local offices in Germany and the U.S.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.