Why Lean fails so often

When something fails more than 90% of the time, it’s usually tossed to the curb. Lean implementations fail at least that often. Why do they fail so often, and why do companies keep trying?

05/17/2016


When something fails more than 90% of the time, it’s usually tossed to the curb. Lean implementations fail at least that often. Why do they fail so often, and why do companies keep trying? Courtesy: SiemensThe "keep trying" part is easy: There are many stories of great results derived from the desperation to try almost anything to become more competitive. It's the "almost" part that causes the collapse.

Let's start with the most visible causes of failure. The technical ones. Lean is a thinking system that includes tools, not a system of tools. When leadership doesn't understand this basic fact, there's a low ceiling on improvement.

Slapping tools on a factory without specific just-in-time purpose that matters to employees, and on top of whatever is already in place, won't work. Yet, it's a common form of Lean implementation. That effort is typically led by someone who fails to realize that Toyota designed tools to meet its needs, not anyone else's, and that tools are a means to an end—and not an end. Copy-paste isn't a good approach, especially when you don't understand what you're copying.

A second cause of Lean disintegration is managerial. Lean is unlikely to fit well into current management systems, yet management rarely thinks its processes need to change. When conversation is about "who" and a culture of blame instead of on process, Lean is absent. Additionally, problem solving can require new skills and time to get to root causes. The same managers who fail to provide that support are the ones expressing frustration at repeat problems. Band-Aids make a simple system complex and do not drive problems from the business.

The third source of Lean failures is philosophical. When people are viewed as an expense, there will be trouble. When the numbers are more important than learning, there will be trouble. When leadership says "we want to do Lean" instead of "we want to become Lean," it rarely understands the pervasive nature of organizational change required.

While I have seen all these causes of Lean failures, one of the most common factors limiting success is the philosophical wall of "the company is the owner's asset." While legally true, that perception limits the commitment of every other stakeholder. This usually appears as Lean is at risk when management changes.

So why does Lean fail so often?

Because it's not nearly as simple as it seems. Successful Lean implementations require significant and pervasive change throughout most organizations, with constant reinforcement of the behavioral adjustments. It is not a silver bullet, nor is it quick. Like weight control and smoking cessation, people start with good intentions. Some make immediate and noticeable changes. But it's much more difficult to make the changes stick for life.

I encourage you to look at every slippage in your conversion to becoming Lean as an opportunity to learn and grow. Slow progress is still progress. It's only failure if you quit learning and return to what you were comfortable with before all this started.

- Written by Becky Morgan. This article originally appeared on Association for Manufacturing Excellence (AME).  AME is a CFE Media content partner. Edited by Erin Dunne, production coordinator, CFE Media, edunne@cfemedia.com.



DAVID , VA, United States, 05/24/16 10:18 AM:

Absolutely agree with the article. Organizations that subscribe to being "learning organizations" and being able to adapt to change readily, seem to be able to embrace Lean concepts and have better implementation success!!
Anonymous , 06/08/16 12:23 PM:

This could not be more true. Not sure why the only answer is to blame someone rather look at the process and culture that drive that behavior.
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
2017 Lubrication Guide; Software tools; Microgrids and energy strategies; Use robots effectively
Prescriptive maintenance; Hannover Messe 2017 recap; Reduce welding errors
Safety standards and electrical test instruments; Product of the Year winners; Easy and safe electrical design
Infrastructure for natural gas expansion; Artificial lift methods; Disruptive technology and fugitive gas emissions
Mobility as the means to offshore innovation; Preventing another Deepwater Horizon; ROVs as subsea robots; SCADA and the radio spectrum
Future of oil and gas projects; Reservoir models; The importance of SCADA to oil and gas
Diagnostic functions for system safety; Specifying industrial enclosures; Effective decision support for a crisis
Transformers; Electrical system design; Selecting and sizing transformers; Grounded and ungrounded system design, Paralleling generator systems
Natural gas for tomorrow's fleets; Colleges and universities moving to CHP; Power and steam and frozen foods

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
Featured articles highlight technologies that enable the Industrial Internet of Things, IIoT-related products and strategies to get data more easily to the user.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me