Who's changing settings on your instrumentation?

Let's say a pressure sensor regularly bumps against its alarm limit. An operator decides to take a hand-held and shift it just a little to knock off the racket. Is that OK?

09/03/2009


Recently I heard a report that a well known oil, gas, and petrochem industry company had done a survey of the instrumentation in one of its plants. The company was dismayed to find that many of the devices had settings that were different than they were supposed to be according to the database in the control system.

Further investigation determined that it was a relatively common practice for operators to go into the plant with a hand-held interface and tweak settings. Several reasons were cited for this, but the most common had to do with trying to reduce the number of "nuisance" alarms. In most cases the changes were appropriate or at least tolerable and did not result in unsafe conditions. However making such adjustments without updating the database information is not a good idea for any number of reasons.

The problematic practice was limited to the parts of the plant that operated with hard-wired analog communication. Most devices involved were HART enabled and it was very simple to change the configuration in the field with a hand-held communicator. Operators did update the database from time to time, but this was the exception.

Other parts of the plant operate using fieldbus communication, which makes this type of unmanaged change much more difficult. Platforms such as Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus PA allow for such setting changes, however the procedure involves doing it from a more centralized location such as an engineering station. Modifications require appropriate clearance, are recorded by the system, and can be set to update the database automatically.

Without such built-in procedures, change management becomes a matter of training and discipline among operators. If it is not followed and the information in the control system no longer reflects reality, it isn't difficult to imagine the kinds of problems that could result during troubleshooting or in the wake of an upset or accident.

What is your experience? Does this sort of thing go on in your plant? Is it a problem?

Join the discussion and offer your thoughts on this topic, which is now featured in the "discussion" areas on the Control Engineering groups at Facebook or Linkedin .

 

-Peter Welander, process industries editor, PWelander@cfemedia.com,
Control Engineering Process Instrumentation & Sensors Monthly
Register here to select your choice of free eNewsletters .

 





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Bring focus to PLC programming: 5 things to avoid in putting your system together; Managing the DCS upgrade; PLM upgrade: a step-by-step approach
Balancing the bagging triangle; PID tuning improves process efficiency; Standardizing control room HMIs
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.