Who owns your brain?


For years, I've thought the concepts of artificial intelligence (AI) and expert systems (ES) were really good ideas -- especially in the face of a growing shortage of skilled workers coincident with increasingly complex industrial processes, equipment, and systems. Capturing the brainpower of your most knowledgeable people so that it could be passed along to assist others has always sounded like a good plan.

But lately I've been having second thoughts. After all, who really owns that knowledge, and why should it be distributed -- usually without compensation.

There are some difficult legal and ethical dilemmas involved here. Presumably, a big part of the reason you have your current job is what you know, what you have learned. The development of AI and ES raises the question of whom that knowledge belongs to. Is it you, or your employer? And if a knowledge engineer shows up at your office, how much should you share with him? If he "drains your brain," are you more, or less, valuable to your company? Can your company take that intelligence and give it or sell it to others without compensating you?

Certain aspects of intellectual property are well established, of course. Patentable products and copyrightable materials developed in the course of employment are generally considered the property of the employer, for example. And proprietary processes or trade secrets belong to the employer. But there is a whole range of knowledge and experience a company might wish to capture that is open to question.

The lines of demarcation used to be much clearer. A person's knowledge was (and for the most part, still is) a marketable commodity. But when that knowledge is somehow captured in a retrievable form no longer controlled by you, what happens to your personal "marketable value?" Once your company has stored your knowledge, do they still need to employ you? Could you "download" your knowledge again for another employer?

I must admit that there is a certain appeal to having my knowledge captured as part of an AI/ES program. There's a hint of immortality about it. At the same time, I don't like the idea of losing control, of giving away something I worked so hard to develop. How much of my knowledge is "corporate property?" Should I be paid extra by my employer if I share it? If it has been recorded in a corporate archive, can I still use it? Sure, it's my brain. But who owns the stuff in it?

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.