Which is right for you? OEE vs. MTBF

The OEE and MTBF metrics both can drive specific behaviors when applied correctly. However, when applied incorrectly, they will likely lead to confusion and frustration.

08/19/2015


If you have had some level of classic reliability or maintenance-related training, then you may have likely at least had an exposure to some of the more commonly used metrics such as OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) and MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure).

Both of these metrics can be very informative and drive some specific behaviors when applied correctly. However, when applied incorrectly, they will likely lead to confusion and frustration.

While I don’t intend to make anyone an expert at these two commonly used metrics in this forum, I do want to share some insight on how and where we might best apply these metrics to get the greatest impact.

Let’s start with Overall Equipment Effectiveness.

Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)

The layman’s version of OEE is simply defined as what percentage of the time that you were capable of running good product at full capacity and with acceptable quality did you do so? Perfection at OEE is 100%. Anything more than that and you are breaking a few laws of physics, but we will save that trip down the rabbit hole for another time.

The generally accepted formula for OEE is as follows:

Overall Equipment Effectiveness (%) = Availability (%) X Performance Efficiency (%) X Quality Rate (%)

With a simple definition of the components being:

Availability = The percentage of the time that you actually ran and produced something.

Performance Efficiency = During this time that you actually produced, at what percentage of your rated capacity (speed, throughput, etc.) did you actually run.

Quality Rate = For all of the units that you produced, what percentage of them were acceptable for sale to the customer, meeting the stated quality requirements.

For example:

Availability = 80%

Performance Efficiency = 90%

Quality Rate = 99%

OEE = 80% X 90% X 99%

OEE = 71.28%

Both of the OEE and MTBF metrics can be very informative and drive specific behaviors when applied correctly. However, when applied incorrectly, they will likely lead to confusion and frustration. Courtesy: CFE MediaI think that OEE is a fantastic measure for a few important reaso

  • Nowhere in the definition do the words “maintenance” or “operations” appear. It brings us together under one common measure. It facilitates two teams who can easily work at cross-purposes to work together. For example, availability losses can be experienced as a result of both maintenance and operating practices.
  • It forces us to focus on the loss of potential rather than what we have accomplished with no idea of what might be possible.
  • It brings together three aspects that are critical to meeting our customer’s needs. For example, if we only measured availability, we might overlook the fact that we ran at 50% speed.

I look at OEE as the universal measure. Mix with it some safety and cost awareness and you have a great start to a complete performance scorecard.

Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF)

As the name implies, the Mean Time Between Failure tells us how often, on average (mean), we should expect to see an asset fail to fulfill its function. Higher MTBF is always considered to be better.

A simple definition for MTBF is:

MTBF = Operating Hours ÷ Number of Failures

Operating Hours = The time frame (frequency of measurement).

Number of Failures = The number of occurrences where the asset failed to fulfill its function.

Note: MTBF is the reciprocal of the Failure Rate (1/MTBF = Failure Rate).

For example:

Assume we measure MTBF on a monthly basis (30 days or 720 hours), and we have experienced 10 failures in this time frame.

MTBF = 720 hours ÷ 10 failures = 72 hours

MTBF = 30 days ÷ 10 failures = 3 days

This means that under current conditions, we should expect to experience a failure every 72 hours.

MTBF is a relative measure. Measuring MTBF on a highly critical asset or group of assets can be very meaningful. Measuring MTBF across an entire department or facility provides less value.

The key to leveraging MTBF is to understand where these failures come from, and to develop lasting strategies that will eliminate them. Your RCFA ability becomes very important when you are measuring MTBF.

Which is right for you? OEE or MTBF?

My short answer to this question is that if you can measure OEE in a meaningful way, then this is the metric for you. Sadly, OEE does not fit in all situations.

Discrete Manufacturing

Discrete manufacturing is the production of distinct items. Automobiles, furniture, toys, smartphones, and airplanes are examples of discrete manufacturing products.

If this definition fits, then OEE is for you. You should be concerned about factors such as availability, performance efficiency, and quality rate. These factors are central to your success.

Process Industries

Process industries are those who run a continuous batch where distinction between one unit and another is not easily identified. Power generation, oil production and refining, and many petrochemical processes fall into this category.

Unfortunately, in these types of environments, OEE might not serve our purposes for the following reasons:

  • Availability is often so critical in process industries that we see a high level of redundant equipment (with a corresponding capital investment). If we experience a failure of one piece of equipment, we switch over to the redundant unit and continue on. For this reason, availability losses are usually greatly minimized.
  • Performance efficiency losses can exist, but rather than run slow, we often immediately bring the backup unit online and begin a fix to the underperforming unit.
  • It is often difficult, if not impossible, to identify quality losses in process industries. What does a bad kilowatt look like?

In these situations, establishing MTBF as a meaningful measure on specific highly critical assets and trending your performance upward will likely provide much more value than OEE.

Conclusion

Metrics are a funny thing. When used correctly and with the right application, they can provide a lot of value and focus to an organization. Used incorrectly, they tend to cause more harm than good.

When selecting the best metrics for your team, consider the following advice:

  • Keep it simple. Too many measures cloud the focus.
  • Make sure we know what actions to take in order to improve the performance of each metric. What must we do differently in order to improve? It sounds obvious, but surprisingly it is often overlooked.
  • Talk about it often. A metric is only as good as the leader who draws the team together to own it.

Mike Gehloff is principal at the Allied Reliability Group (ARG). ARG is a content partner of CFE Media.This article originally appeared on the Maintenance Phoenix blog. Edited by Joy Chang, digital project manager, CFE Media, jchang@cfemedia.com



ROBERT , NY, United States, 08/20/15 11:09 AM:

A bad kilowatt ....this is really a deviation from a specification for the given product. In your example, I submit that a bad kilowatt is power produced outside frequency and or voltage specifications. If you are required to provide 480 kVolts +/- 10 volts at 60Hz +/- 2 Hz and your frequency goes outside that or you have sags or surges then that is bad quality.

Bob
CARLOS , Non-US/Not Applicable, Mexico, 08/20/15 11:19 AM:

A bad KWH is when the voltage or the frequency or the THD are not at the specified levels. How bad depend how far are these parameters out of range.
Narayan , India, 08/20/15 11:31 PM:

I think OEE will help some way go closure to 'Effective Asset Performance Management' where IoT technologies could be used.
CURTIS , SC, United States, 08/21/15 11:32 AM:

Excellent information.
Anonymous , 10/23/15 11:26 PM:

correct information on the usage of right metrics
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
2016 Product of the Year; Diagnose bearing failures; Asset performance management; Testing dust collector performance measures
Safety for 18 years, warehouse maintenance tips, Ethernet and the IIoT, GAMS 2016 recap
2016 Engineering Leaders Under 40; Future vision: Where is manufacturing headed?; Electrical distribution, redefined
SCADA at the junction, Managing risk through maintenance, Moving at the speed of data
Safety at every angle, Big Data's impact on operations, bridging the skills gap
The digital oilfield: Utilizing Big Data can yield big savings; Virtualization a real solution; Tracking SIS performance
Applying network redundancy; Overcoming loop tuning challenges; PID control and networks
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing arc flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Package boilers; Natural gas infrared heating; Thermal treasure; Standby generation; Natural gas supports green efforts

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
This article collection contains several articles on the vital role of plant safety and offers advice on best practices.
This article collection contains several articles on the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and how it is transforming manufacturing.
This article collection contains several articles on strategic maintenance and understanding all the parts of your plant.
click me