Warranty and guarantee: What's the difference?

Who will decide whether a building performs to the standard to which it was designed? LEED v4 changes the way an engineer must think during design.


Warranty and guarantee sound similar and share a common root, but they can mean completely different things, especially if you are working on a project that incorporates a building rating system such as U.S. Green Building Council LEED v4 or Green Globes that rely on proper performance of building materials.

With the introduction of LEED v4 came some subtle—and some not so subtle—changes in the way that the engineer must think during design. Compared to previous versions of LEED, LEED v4 places a larger emphasis on actual building performance through the LEED Dynamic Plaque, which monitors a building's real-time resource consumption and can change the building's rating on the fly. In the past, buildings were rated on design, construction, commissioning, and paperwork requirements, but now buildings themselves will deliver an unbiased report on their actual health.

This new tool introduces a large amount of physical metering infrastructure, data capture, communication, and monitoring capabilities into the project, adding significant risk to the engineer, contractor, commissioning agent, and, in fact, everyone else involved in the project except for the owner.

Exactly who will be held responsible for the buildings that do not perform to the standard to which they were designed is something that the courts will decide if the owner takes legal action. I'm pretty sure the first couple cases will be quite interesting, as the lawyers are going to pick apart the design documents.

In the meantime, however, engineers need to incorporate performance specifications into project manuals that, at minimum, properly define achievable performance targets. This is where the subtle differences in language become key players (see Black's Law Dictionary for detailed information).

The legal definition of warranty is "an assurance, promise, or guaranty by one party that a particular statement of fact is true and may be relied upon by the other party." The legal definition of guarantee in noun form is "an undertaking or promise that is collateral to the primary or principal obligation and that binds the guarantor to performance in the event of nonperformance by the principal obligator." In plain language, this means that if our building envelope system does not work as promised, liability for the warranty transfers to the guarantor who, in our case, is the contractor or installer.

Generally, it is good practice to avoid the use of guarantee and instead exclusively and consistently use warranty or warranty period. It is also good practice to not specify a warranty period for each product or specification (unless specifying a minimum warranty term) as doing so may limit the rights of the owner, such as reducing the amount of warranty coverage available. In any case, be careful that doing so does not conflict with the contract and supplementary conditions.

Going back to the example of the building envelope system, we see that the manufacturer has a warranty for the material when properly installed. The contractor provides a warranty for the workmanship involved in installing the materials and a third party guarantee for the materials. Whatever warranty exists, it is separate from the one year correction period, during which time the contractor is obliged to correct any deficiencies regardless of warranty.

Michael Heinsdorf, PE, LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOMMasterSpec. He has more than 10 years' experience in consulting engineering, and is the lead author of MasterSpec Electrical, Communications, and Electronic Safety and Security guide specifications. He holds a BSEE from Drexel University and is currently pursuing a Masters in Engineering Management, also at Drexel University.

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.