Using withstand current rating to improve electrical system designs

11/08/2013


Rating transfer switches

Figure 2: In this drawing, the ATS is shown in the emergency position and is connected to the genset. During a specific breaker test, the ATS is transferred to the test power source into fault current, which is created by connecting all three phases of thTransfer switch WCRs are typically listed in the specification sheets. The four main types of WCR are specific breaker, any breaker, short time, and fuses. 

Specific breaker: Specific breaker ratings are generally popular on larger installations where a higher level of planning is required (see Figure 2). An ATS with a specific breaker rating (in accordance with UL 1008) must pass the short-circuit test while being protected by that specific breaker. There are numerous specific breaker choices for particular transfer switches. When using a specific breaker rating, it is advisable to select the breaker interrupt and I2t ratings to exceed the transfer switch withstand and I2t, especially with molded-case circuit breakers. As molded-case circuit breakers age, the trip characteristics may change, causing the tripping time to slow and exposing the ATS to energy above the WCR. 

For the specific breaker rating, tests are performed with a specific molded-case circuit breaker between the ATS and the test source. The fault current is applied for the time it takes the selected circuit breaker to clear the specified test current. This time is used to determine which specific breakers may be used. Any breaker that meets the fault current rating requirement and can clear the fault in the same time or more quickly than the tested breaker can have this noted on the transfer switch ratings decal. 

Any breaker (or umbrella breaker): An ATS that passes the any breaker test (in accordance with UL 1008) can withstand a fault of a given magnitude for 3 cycles (or 1.5 cycles for transfer switches with a rating smaller than 400 A with an any-breaker-rating of 10,000 A or lower). This allows an ATS to be used with any circuit breaker that has an instantaneous trip function. Using the umbrella of the any breaker rating has simplified ordering and installing ATSs and circuit breakers. This makes them popular on smaller installations where planning is generally not as detailed. 

For transfer switches rated above 400 A or for those used on circuits with fault currents greater than 10 kA, the short circuit test requires the fault current be applied for a minimum of 50 msec (3 electrical cycles) at a specific power factor. Passing this test allows the manufacturer to mark the switch for use with any manufacturer’s circuit breaker within its rating. This is sometimes referred to as an umbrella rating and gives the designer more flexibility in installation. 

Short time: ATS units using these ratings are generally over-protected and could be properly protected with a smaller WCR with one of the other methods. This is because they are protected by upstream breakers and can withstand short-circuit currents for longer periods as they have a short-time—as opposed to instantaneous-trip—capability. This also makes them popular with engineers, as they are easier to specify, although there is generally a higher cost implication. In 2007, UL amended the 1008 standard to account for short time ratings for transfer switches that are protected by upstream breakers and that have a short time delay of 3 to 30 cycles (50 msec to 500 msec, in a 60-Hz environment). 

Fuses: The final type of protection detailed by UL 1008 is also the most simple: current-limiting fuses. Current-limiting fuses limit the current that passes through them during a fault and ensures the protection of downstream system components from catastrophic failure because they typically clear faults within a half cycle. Current-limiting fuses allow the ATS to be assigned a higher WCR because of the extremely short clearing time. 

The bigger picture

It’s important to not lose sight of how the ATS fits into the overall electrical system. The power system’s X/R ratio, in particular, must be considered. UL 1008-rated ATS units are tested on systems with specific X/R ratios and with circuit breakers or current-limiting fuses deployed upstream. Current-limiting fuses deployed upstream can significantly reduce the duration of a short-circuit current compared with systems that use circuit breakers. This is important because the peak available current at the transfer switch must be understood so the correct ATS can be selected to meet continuous and symmetrical current requirements.

For example, a 200 A transfer switch tested at 22,000 A (symmetrical) at an X/R ratio of 4.9 will withstand 48,026 A (instantaneous peak). However, if this switch were applied in a circuit with an X/R ratio of 6.17, it would be subjected to 50,204 A (peak instantaneous). This may seem like a relatively small jump, but the consequences could be severe: the switch may fail and wider damage may ensue. As with planning backup power systems, attention to detail is crucial. While the transfer switch may seem inconsequential, its effect on the overall system cannot be underestimated.


Allen Frederick is a senior staff engineer with Kohler Power Systems, Americas. He has been with the company since 2008 and specializes in switchgear project management, electric utility distribution system engineering and planning, and control system engineering. Frederick has a BS in electrical engineering from the University of Wisconsin, Platteville.

Steven Ennesser is an electrical project engineer with Kohler Power Systems, Americas. He has been with the company since 2012 and specializes in automatic transfer switches. Ennesser has a BS in electrical engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering.


<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.