Upgrading control systems for storm water management in a very cramped budget environment
Existing configuration tools and code libraries helped Detroit’s wastewater system reduce design and commissioning time.
Detroit’s wastewater treatment plant is one of the largest in the U.S., serving more than one-third of Michigan’s population. The plant’s size and complexity are rooted in a convergence of three major forces: industry, water, and weather.
The city’s population exploded in the 1920s with the advent of automobile production. The newly minted “Motor City” continued to grow, ranking among America’s top 10 major metro areas for the rest of the 20th century. The city is also synonymous with water: Its name comes from the river that runs through it, which French explorers called Rivière du Détroit and translates to “River of the Strait.” That strait—today’s Detroit River—leads to Lake Erie and the rest of the Great Lakes.
Like many of America’s urban waterways, the Detroit River and its tributaries were once badly polluted by raw sewage and storm water runoff. Construction of the city’s treatment plant in 1939 and a major series of expansions and upgrades over the next 50 years significantly improved effluent water quality. But a major problem remained: Heavy rains and snow melts sometimes overloaded the treatment plant, allowing polluted storm water to run into the Detroit River and the connecting Rouge River. The Rouge, which lies at the center of a large watershed in the metro Detroit area, was so polluted by chemically laden runoff that the river caught fire in 1969.
To improve protection from runoff, the city began building a network of combined sewer overflow basins 25 years ago. Today, the department operates eight such basins, strategically located in places where storm runoff would otherwise reach the rivers. By capturing and substantially treating the storm water, the basins play a major role in protecting the surrounding watersheds along with the people and wildlife living there.
In just the first three months of 2011, for example, the basins collected more than 5 billion gal of runoff that would have otherwise escaped into waterways. While a third was pumped to the main plant for treatment, the rest of that water was treated in the basins.
Similar process, different systems
Each combined sewer overflow facility differs somewhat in size and design, but all basically apply the same treatment process: retaining the overflow, mechanically screening out solids, and disinfecting the water with sodium hypochlorite (bleach). Basins also have equipment that operators use to monitor flow rate and volume, collect samples, remove residual water from the basins, and clean them after a wet-weather event.
Despite their similar functions, the basins’ process control instruments vary widely. That’s partly because the basins were constructed over the course of the last three decades at a time when automated control technology was quickly evolving. The comparatively slow pace of public works projects tended to keep them as originally installed with few upgrades. From concept to commissioning, each basin required several years to complete because of strict municipal codes requiring public planning, open bidding, and official oversight. Meanwhile, federal and state water quality standards were becoming more stringent, adding another layer of complexity.
“Through the years, we’ve had to update the process control systems at various basins to comply with changing regulations,” explained Anil Gosine, process control system administrator for the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD). He describes the result as a “myriad of different process control systems at different locations. At one basin, we have process control equipment from four different vendors. The lack of a standardized platform hampers troubleshooting and maintenance, and inventory is another problem, because we need to keep so many different spare parts on hand.”
Selecting a solution
In 2004, DWSD hired a consultant to design new, more effective and efficient control systems for two existing Combined Sewer Overflow Facilities. DWSD engineers specified Rockwell Automation as the vendor for the process control systems after performing a lifecycle cost analysis.
“We carefully compared the options that DWSD is standardizing on, looking at capital and lifecycle costs,” Gosine explained. “We already use hundreds of their products, so we’re familiar with the quality of their technology, maintenance tasks, and troubleshooting techniques.”
The new system is built on Rockwell’s PlantPAx process automation system, which is an integrated control and information solution that combines capabilities of DCS with access to process information to help achieve plant-wide optimization. System integrator Process Control & Instrumentation (PCI), LLC, was awarded the contract for replacement of nonfunctional control system instrumentation at two DWSD CSO Basins. PCI worked with DWSD on other recent projects, giving PCI engineers a good understanding of the overall SCADA system.
Using the library
But PCI faced a dilemma when it received the contract to retool the basins. The company had strategically offered the lowest bid to win the project with DWSD, as well as partner with Rockwell Automation for the first time. However, once into the project, PCI engineers were concerned that the total cost of replacing the obsolete control systems would exceed the agreed-upon contract amount.
Rockwell Automation engineers recommended a solution that they thought could help keep the project within budget—its PlantPAx Process Library and Water Wastewater Accelerator toolkit. The process library is a software application for the Logix Control Platform that includes an array of pre-engineered code that can be used in various applications. It also incorporates custom faceplates based on specific plant roles, icons, and documentation.
The toolkit customizes those elements in a way that reduces the time required to design, install, operate, and maintain a wastewater project. The toolkit contains configured files, selection tools, and examples of how to connect the ControlLogix controller to the facility’s HMI hardware and other devices over EtherNet/IP and DeviceNet networks. The toolkit also provides system architecture drawings, basic status, control and diagnostic logic, as well as faceplates for FactoryTalk View Site Edition HMI software used in the new Detroit basins.
PCI’s controls engineer on the DWSD basins project said, “In the past, we’d have to program the HMI separately from the controller and then link them together. The toolkit comes with 80% of the necessary code, predefined and factory-tested. So you’re free to focus on customizing the machine control for the customer.”
The Rockwell Automation team on the project worked closely with PCI’s engineers on how to use the process library and the accelerator toolkit to custom configure the system for the Detroit basins. “We needed to modify the toolkit to make the process data presentation familiar to DWSD operating folks,” the PCI engineer explained. “Some graphic faceplate elements didn’t align with DWSD’s color and naming conventions. For instance, they were used to seeing a red light when a piece of equipment was turned on, instead of the green light built into the process library. So we made that change and others that created a special standard toolkit just for Detroit.”
Saving on commissioning
The PCI engineer estimated that the process library and toolkit cut his work in half for both basins, saving around $120,000 in programming and systems-integration time. Another $90,000 was saved in factory-acceptance testing and start-up/commissioning.
“Programming the first motor took two hours, but after that I just had to copy and paste the code,” said the PCI engineer, who now is working on his fourth project using the process library and toolkit. “The cooperation I’ve gotten from Rockwell Automation has been amazing. I had the opportunity to interface with the original programmer of the toolkit to make the changes as needed.”
DWSD officials estimate the new tools from Rockwell Automation provided a 50% reduction in design time, contract oversight, and post-contract documentation and support.
“There’s a much shorter learning curve for the operators with the PlantPAx system,” said Gosine, who helped oversee the project for DWSD. “We also have access to a lot more data in an integrated format at these two basins. That has really improved the diagnostics, allowing more preventive and predictable maintenance.”
Gosine added that DWSD is in the process of standardizing two more basins with the same approach. He expects that in the future, DWSD can make upgrades to the retrofitted basin controls using the process library, meaning engineers won’t have to completely recreate process standards and codes, saving time and money.
Steve Liebrecht is a solution architect for Rockwell Automation.
- Municipalities, like many companies, may have to undertake major control system upgrades even when budgets are very limited.
- Use of existing graphics and software can save money over creating new and unique solutions.
Click on the links below to learn more about water utility applications
For more information, visit:
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.