Understanding emission requirements for standby gensets


RICE NESHAP and NSPS: The RICE NESHAP requirements from the EPA have received a lot of attention in the last few years, largely because of the impact these requirements have on existing nonemergency diesel and natural gas generators. These requirements have meant that many existing nonemergency diesel generators have had to add oxidation catalysts and other equipment to their engines. In keeping with the overall focus of this article on new emergency diesel generators, we will review RICE NESHAP and NSPS from this standpoint. 

A facility is deemed by the EPA to be an area source if it has the potential to emit less than 10 tons/yr of any single hazardous air pollutant or less than 25 tons/yr of any combination of hazardous air pollutants. A major source has emissions greater than the area source levels. Typically, major sources have more stringent requirements.

The EPA has classified more than 70 area source categories. Examples include stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE) and boilers. Each of these categories has special NESHAP requirements and an associated timeline. 

While NESHAP can impact new and existing RICE, NSPS applies to only new installations. As with RICE NESHAP, NSPS typically specifies performance standards that are defined within the EPA Tier levels discussed later in this article. 

For the critical power engineer, RICE NESHAP and NSPS are typically not major issues for new emergency diesel gensets greater than 500 hp. Since 2008, all major manufacturers have produced engines that meet RICE NESHAP and NSPS requirements for new emergency diesel engines. To meet these requirements for a new diesel emergency engine, the engine must be certified to at least Tier 3; if it is greater than 752 hp, it must be certified to at least Tier 2. Most of the resulting obligations from RICE NESHAP apply to the facility operators, not the critical power engineer designing the facility. For example, site operators should use ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) fuel. This is not a big constraint because ULSD has been in wide use since 2007. The facility operator must also record emergency operation with reference to a nonresettable hour meter and make this information available to the EPA if requested. There are other relatively straightforward record keeping and maintenance obligations for facility operators to maintain compliance with RICE NESHAP. 

Figure 3: This diagram shows possible EPA impacts for diesel engines used for emergency standby. Courtesy: Safety Power Inc.Tiers 2, 3, and 4: There has been a lot of press coverage on Tier 4 and its subsets Tier 4i (interim) and Tier 4f (final). The Tier 4 standards have had a huge impact on engine manufacturers because significant emissions reductions have been required to meet these standards. It is not uncommon for a large T4 stationary engine to cost 40% more than a similar power Tier 2 or Tier 3 engine because of the extensive emissions aftertreatment equipment that may be required. In addition, large stationary T4 gensets often require significantly more space allocation than Tier 2 or Tier 3 units. 

The concept of EPA Tiers started in the early 1990s. The current level for new stationary nonemergency diesel engines exceeding 560 hp is Tier 4i, and by January 2015, Tier 4f will be in place for large stationary gensets. Under Tier 4, a large engine is considered to be one that exceeds 752 hp, whereas under RICE NESHAP, it is 500 hp. In general, EPA T4 standards target on-highway, off-road mobile sources and stationary nonemergency engine-driven generators. EPA T4 is not required for emergency gensets, but some engine vendors are advocating use of T4 engines to ensure there are no operating restrictions beyond the current 100 hr maintenance and testing limit currently in place. If a new engine is not T4, it must have a permanent label indicating that it is for emergency use only. It is important to note that, in addition to significant extra cost and space requirements, there can be some significant disadvantages to using T4-certified engines for emergency applications. For example, under current EPA rules, a certified T4 emergency engine used in a data center must shut down if the urea is unavailable. This is not a desirable situation for an emergency generator running during a long utility outage. 

EPA regulatory framework summary

As mentioned previously, this article looks mainly at large diesel engines used in emergency standby applications. Figure 3 shows the EPA regulatory impacts for this type of application. If the critical power facility is large (has engines that exceed 500 hp), is located in a nonattainment area, and does full load testing, it may require some form of NOX or NO2 mitigation. Table 1 summarizes the EPA regulations associated with large stationary diesel engines used in emergency applications. 

Technology to deal with air emissions from diesel engines

For large stationary diesel engines up to and including Tier 3, engine manufacturers have adopted many innovative technologies that typically focus on in-cylinder optimizations. Looking beyond Tier 3, much of the focus has been on exhaust aftertreatment technologies. For diesel engines, the most common aftertreatment emission control technologies are:

  • Oxidation catalyst to deal with CO and unburned hydrocarbons
  • Diesel particulate filter to meet PM requirements
  • Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) to meet NOX requirements.  

As mentioned previously, often NOX becomes the constraining pollutant from a NAAQS standpoint. All diesel engines will also require some level of exhaust silencing. As a result, a common configuration for large critical power facilities in nonattainment areas is to use Tier 2 for engines exceeding 752 hp and Tier 3 for engines less than 752 hp in combination with an SCR and silencing. 

Oxidation catalysts and PM filters

Figure 4: The SCR system shown in the photo combines silencing and other emissions functions in a single cube mounted on a standby diesel genset enclosure. Courtesy: Safety Power Inc.For diesel engines, oxidation catalysts are often combined with particulate filters. This can be done by applying the catalysts, which are usually platinum-group metals, to a particulate filter. Another common approach is to have separate oxidation catalysts upstream of the particulate filters. The oxidation catalyst creates heat by oxidizing unburned hydrocarbons and shifts NO, creating a favorable environment for the particulate filters to regenerate. 


SCR works by injecting a reductant, usually a 32.5% concentration of urea into the exhaust stream. The urea is converted into ammonia (NH3) in the hot exhaust stream. In the presence of a catalyst, the NH3 combines with the NOX in the exhaust to produce harmless water vapor and nitrogen. Many SCR systems can achieve NOX reductions of 95% or more. Some exhaust aftertreatment vendors offer multifunction systems that combine SCR, silencing, and slots that can be filled, if required, with oxidation catalysts and PM filters. This gives the critical power engineer a lot of flexibility, allowing him or her to add catalysts and filters late in the project cycle without impacting the size of the emissions unit and the surrounding piping should it be required for the air permit. Figure 4 shows an SCR system that combines silencing and other emissions functions in a single cube mounted on an enclosure that houses a large standby diesel genset. 

Engineering challenges

Figure 5: This drawing shows a separate silencer and SCR system in the exhaust stream of a large data center genset, an example of the traditional approach to aftertreatment. Courtesy: Safety Power Inc.The critical power engineer faces significant air compliance challenges because of the regulatory environment. These challenges are compounded if the site location is not fully finalized when the initial design is done. A change in air shed location could lead to a significant change in the results of the AERMOD simulation. A change in emissions mitigation requirements could then have a significant impact on the physical space required for various aftertreatment devices.

Until recently, aftertreatment was done using separate devices for each emissions function. Figure 5 shows an illustration of a separate silencer and SCR system in the exhaust stream of a large generator used in a data center. The physical space required for the devices and the complex piping and expansion joints required between them makes this arrangement a large and overly complex system. 

Figure 6: This illustration shows an exhaust aftertreatment system that combines SCR, oxidation catalyst, PM filter, and silencing in the same cube. Courtesy: Safety Power Inc.Some vendors now offer exhaust aftertreatment systems that combine all required functions in a single cube. These multifunction systems can contain any combination of SCR, silencing, oxidation catalyst, and PM filters in the same cube. This makes installation much easier and allows critical power engineers to design systems that meet the regulatory requirements of any air shed in the U.S. The cube is typically installed above the engine. As a result, it does not take up much more space than a conventional silencer (see Figure 6). 

Final considerations

The regulatory requirements for obtaining an air permit for large scale critical power facilities using stationary diesel engines is continuing to become more complex. It is important for critical power engineers to understand the overall regulatory framework and build enough flexibility into their design to ensure that the requirements for an air permit can be met.

Bob Stelzer is the chief technical officer for Safety Power Inc., Mississauga, Ont. He leads the engineering team that developed the company’s ecoCUBE family of products, which has been configured for more than 40 engine types from most of the world’s major engine manufacturers. He is a mechanical engineer with a master’s degree in engineering. 

<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.