Tutorial: Vortex shedding flowmeters
One technology that scored well in Control Engineering’s August 2008 Product Research survey on flowmeters is vortex shedding. Vortex shedding flowmeters calculate liquid, gas, or steam flow by observing the vortices formed when a fluid stream passes an obstruction with known characteristics. When a bar (called a bluff body) is inserted across the interior of a pipe, fluid flowing throug...
One technology that scored well in Control Engineering’s August 2008 Product Research survey on flowmeters is vortex shedding.
Vortex shedding flowmeters calculate liquid, gas, or steam flow by observing the vortices formed when a fluid stream passes an obstruction with known characteristics.
When a bar (called a bluff body) is inserted across the interior of a pipe, fluid flowing through the pipe has to pass on one side or the other. As it passes, vortices form on both sides of the body. The frequency of these vortices is determined by the velocity of the fluid stream. Instrumentation devices use a detector to count the frequency, such as strain gages, ultrasonic, capacitance, magnetic, or other types of sensors to generate electrical pulses from the liquid vibrations. The transmitter counts these pulses and converts the reading to a stream velocity from which it calculates fluid volume.
This approach has many advantages:
Accuracy and turn-down ratio are sufficient for most general process applications;
Wide range of sizes available;
Durable and not prone to drift;
Stable, so they need little calibration or maintenance;
Good for gas, steam, and liquid;
Most can mount in any position so long as the pipe is full;
No moving parts;
Works with conductive or non-conductive liquids; and
Configuration options include spool or wafer designs, and insertion styles for larger sizes.
However, there are some downsides you should keep in mind:
Any design that introduces an obstruction causes a pressure drop and creates clogging potential. The extent varies between manufacturers;
Solids depositing on the bluff bar can disrupt accurate readings;
Two-phase flows and slurries are not well-suited for this kind of flowmeter;
Over time, the bluff bar’s shape may change from wear which can cause drift;
Liquid viscosity is generally limited to 30 cp;
Specific designs can be dedicated either to gas or liquid, but not both; and
Ensure sufficient up- and down-stream straight pipe to control turbulence.
Some of the more sophisticated designs add sensors for variables such as fluid temperature and pressure. These readings are often very useful, and can be used to calculate a mass flow reading when known fluid characteristics are added.
To read the Product Research article on flowmeters, visit controleng.com , click on the magazine tab at top of page, select “archive,” and visit the August 2008 issue. The full report is published in the Resource Center at controleng.com. It can be accessed by selecting the “Resource Center” tab at the top of the page.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.