Tutorial: Understanding multivariable sensors
Many smart instrumentation devices can provide more than just one process variable. Is it information you can really use?
One of the benefits of the growing sophistication of instrumentation devices is that they can often give you more than one variable. These bonus measurements are essentially free in that they don't require any additional sensors or penetrations into your process. All they require is a way for you to extract the information.
Multivariable approaches fall into three categories depending largely on the needs of the primary variable.
Most electronic sensors are influenced to some extent by more than one variable. For example, pressure sensors that use capacitive or strain gage technologies are affected by temperature. Consequently, the transmitter for such a device takes a temperature measurement and uses that data to correct the primary reading. Since that measurement is there in the transmitter, it is usually a simple matter to add a way to send it to the control system.
The caution of using corrective measurement data is making sure you understand where it comes from. The temperature in this example is taken where it is needed for the sensor correction and may not reflect the process at all; it just may be reflecting the ambient temperature around the transmitter or the electronic devices. Make sure you understand what it is before you use such data.
One of the most common flow measurement methods is using an orifice plate and differential pressure gage . There are many implementation variations, but the basic concept calculates flow based on pressure readings on both sides of a known obstruction. While the flow measurement only needs the differential pressure value, it isn't difficult to extract the line pressure measurements as well.
Another example is a corrosion measuring sensor . These typically provide outputs for both general corrosion and local or pitting corrosion. It is also simple to get a conductivity reading with such devices.
With the growing sophistication of transmitter electronics, adding calculated values to measured process variables has become far simpler. Coriolis flowmeters use this technique, and can calculate a range of variables from the three that are actually measured (see diagram). Probably the most common example of this is setting your Coriolis device to read in gallons per minute, since the device does not provide a measured volume. It calculates volume based on its measurements of mass flow and density. The transmitter can be setup to provide whichever of the available values you need most as the primary variable.
Bear in mind that all the measurements from a multivariable device are connected in one way or another. These are not clusters of unrelated instruments. You won't likely find a spool section of pipe that has a magnetic flowmeter, temperature sensor, and pressure sensor all inserted. The specificity of process needs precludes the possibility of making something like that with wide enough applicability to be commercially viable.
Extracting the data
Most devices are designed to provide the primary reading via an analog signal (4-20 mA) or a digital output. However, if more information is available, you have to find a way to get at it.
• A few devices offer multiple (usually two) analog outputs. This approach certainly works, but requires as many cables as variables.
• The most common method for sending the secondary variable is via a HART signal on top of the primary analog variable. If you use a HART interface or have HART I/O with your control system, you can capture the secondary measurements and use them in any way that's valuable to the process. Complex devices such as Coriolis flowmeters, allow you to choose which output comes over the analog signal and which others are overlaid. There are various types of HART reading devices. Some translate the secondary variables into their appropriate engineering units for display. Others convert them into a second or third 4-20 mA signal for input into a DCS. There are even wireless approaches for capturing the information.
Getting your HART interface setup properly can be a challenge since manufacturers use this mechanism differently. You'll probably need to use the device description to sort through the data available for any given device. If you are counting on using some specific information, make sure it is available, since there is little consistency between different manufacturers even for similar devices.
(Opinions differ on using secondary HART information for anything important. Control system builders generally agree that it is valuable for monitoring, but are more cautious when using it for critical measurements. At the same time, any measurement that is truly critical will likely have its own device anyway.)
• Fieldbus protocols make multiple variables very simple, if you use that networking approach and have suitable devices. Using fieldbus requires minimal setup since all variables, primary and secondary, will be available in the appropriate engineering units. Moreover, they can all be handled with the same importance.
Multivariable sensors can be very useful in the right contexts, but using them to your best advantage does require some homework. As your best first step, make sure you know what your process needs.
-Edited by Peter Welander, process industries editor, PWelander@cfemedia.com ,
Control Engineering Process Instrumentation & Sensors Monthly
Register here to select your choice of free eNewsletters .
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.