Tutorial: Running down interference to improve device performance
EMI and RFI can ruin your sensor data, and trying to trace sources can drive you nuts. There are solutions.
In past issues we’ve talked about problems with ground loops and cross talk , and how these can ruin sensor data. Electromagnetic and radio frequency interference (EMI and RFI) can also cause your sensor data to go nuts, and finding its sources can make you do the same. The two types of interference can present similar symptoms, but the nature of their sources and solutions are not the same. Trying to define the differences between the two is a little vague and many people use the two terms interchangeably for all practical purposes.
EMI is broadband electrical noise that typically emanates from wiring and equipment. In any situation where there is heavy inductive load switching, electric motors, and particularly complex devices like VFDs (variable frequency drives), you’ll get EMI. In the same way it hurts your radio reception, noise is transferred to your sensors through inductive and capacitive coupling, often between wires. You can get it from having data cables too close to ac wiring in cable trays, for example, which means laying a thermocouple extension wire next to a 440 Vac line is asking for trouble.
RFI is higher frequency, and generally the tougher problem to fix. While EMI usually moves from cable to cable, RFI can be picked up all sorts of ways. It often comes from radio transmitters such as walkie-talkies, cell phones, CB radios, etc. (A driver triggering a CB radio from his truck while driving past my house nearly blew out my stereo speakers.) You’ve probably heard the characteristic beeping on the phone caused by someone’s Blackberry trying to exchange data. There are anecdotes of radios on barges sending systems haywire as they pass plants on the shore.
The thing that makes such interference hard to eliminate is that it can be intermittent. For example, a welder working in the plant makes the temperature sensors on a vessel change, but then they recover when the welding stops. The potential for damage to the process depends on the EMI severity and how well you’ve deployed suppression techniques. Problems that run all the time, more or less, can be tracked down and fixed. The TC wire and ac cable in the same tray are an example.
Many suppression techniques for both kinds of interference exist:
Keeping critical cables separated;
Use of twisted pair and shielded cables;
Filtering capacitors at strategic points;
Careful grounding where appropriate;
Use of signal isolators;
Appropriate case and enclosure designs;
Selection of devices that are designed to reject interference; and
Many other possibilities.
Going into depth in this context is not practical, but there are application notes from several sources that can help you analyze and solve your interference problems. Here are three links to get you started:
These companies can suggest specific practices and offer devices to make the task easier. Also, Control Engineering has offered more extensive discussions on related topics:
Drive EMI: How to control high-frequency noise of adjustable speed drives (ASDs)
Silence of the Drives
Who Puts the 'Industrial’ in Ethernet?
—Peter Welander, process industries editor, PWelander@cfemedia.com ,
Control Engineering Process Instrumentation & Sensors Monthly
Register here to select your choice of free eNewsletters .
- Events & Awards
- Magazine Archives
- Oil & Gas Engineering
- Salary Survey
- Digital Reports
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.