Tutorial: Differential pressure flowmeters
Traditional flow measurement technique survives, often updated with current technology.
Each year Control Engineering magazine does a research survey on flowmeter uses among end users. The August issue (available soon) will have the latest survey results. While electronic technologies are displacing traditional approaches, differential pressure based devices continue to be among the top five.
This is really a very large family of designs that separates into two main categories: flow obstructions and Pitot tubes. For purposes of this discussion, we’ll consider only the former. When an obstruction is placed in a pipe, there will be a difference in fluid pressure upstream and downstream from the obstruction. This difference can be measured and characterized to provide the basis for calculating flow. (An electrical parallel is calculating amperage by measuring the voltage drop across a known resistance.) While it may not be the first flow measuring technique invented, it is certainly one of the earliest, and quickly followed the first practical pressure gages.
Understanding the concepts of a magnetic or Coriolis flowmeter may stretch your thinking but differential pressure flow measurement mechanics are easy to grasp ( although the actual equations can get pretty complicated ). This familiarity, combined with its simplicity, helps the technology survive. The most basic implementation involves placing a disk or other type of orifice in a pipe with an opening smaller than the pipe diameter, with a pressure measurement on either side. There are practical advantages to this approach:
The technology is simple and easy to understand;
There are no moving parts;
The sensor is very compact;
Works equally well for gas or liquid;
Can be configured to measure bi-directional flow;
Usable over a very wide range of sizes;
Devices can be mechanical or electronic;
Relatively inexpensive; and,
You can even build one yourself.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks:
It’s not the most accurate technology. If high precision or wide turn-down is your objective, there are better choices.
Devices cause a pressure drop and reduce the pipe’s free passage. The extent of this depends on the design.
Accuracy and turn-down are related to pressure drop. The more accuracy and range you need, the greater pressure drop you will have to tolerate.
While there are no moving parts, the orifice itself is often a wear-prone point. If it gradually enlarges, the flow measurement will read proportionally lower. On the other hand, if it becomes partly obstructed with debris, the measurement will read higher.
The same application and installation guidelines for pressure sensors apply here. Anything that interferes with the pressure readings (clogged impulse lines, etc.) will interfere with a true flow calculation.
Changes in liquid characteristics (viscosity, multiphase flow, etc.) can affect readings. This varies by design.
These are generalities, so discuss your specific application needs with any prospective suppliers.
Differential pressure flowmeters are available from a variety of suppliers, including:
—Peter Welander, process industries editor, PWelander@cfemedia.com ,
Control Engineering Process Instrumentation & Sensors Monthly
Register here and scroll down to select your choice of free eNewsletters .
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.