Timing is everything

Engineers must consider arc flash prevention in the electrical systems. How important is timing?


Because an arc flash relay depends on an existing circuit breaker to interrupt the current, does it make a difference in overall reaction time? And if the relay must wait until an arc forms, will the relay take longer to trip than the circuit breaker would trip on its own? Finally, how does the reaction time of an arc flash relay compare to an overcurrent protection relay? 

Circuit breakers must react somewhat slowly to low-level faults; otherwise, they would nuisance trip. Arc flash relays avoid nuisance tripping by sensing light. Light is present even at the early stages of an arc flash. 

The current drawn by an arc flash event will vary depending on circumstances; a tool across two live phases will have very low resistance and may draw as much current as a bolted short, while a momentary ground fault can have much higher resistance and may draw only 1/3 the current of a bolted short. If the arcing fault current is less than the instantaneous trip level of a circuit breaker or overcurrent protection relay, then it falls into the short-time trip on the overload curve. In contrast, an arc flash relay detects the light from an emerging arc flash and sends a trip signal to the existing circuit breaker in approximately 1 ms. 

After receiving a trip signal from an arc flash relay, a typical circuit breaker used in switchgear or a motor control center may take about 50 ms to open, depending on make and model. This is the breaker’s mechanical clearing time and is the same or slightly less than the time it takes for it to react to a high-value fault. But many arcs begin as fairly low value faults that draw less than the breaker’s instantaneous trip current, and only reach that level after several milliseconds. An arc flash relay will detect an arc as soon as it begins and trigger the breaker directly, reducing the time to clear the fault to the arc flash relay’s 1-ms response time plus the breaker’s mechanical clearing time. Because arc flash incident energy grows exponentially with time, those saved milliseconds can make the difference between damage that is hardly noticeable and a catastrophe.

A similar comparison can be made with an overcurrent protection relay. Compared to the 1 ms reaction time of an arc flash relay, a typical overcurrent protection relay can take between 25 and 45 ms to detect a fault and send a signal to the circuit breaker. A digital or numeric overcurrent protection relay requires time for sampling the signal, conversion to digital, calculation and operation of an output, while an analog unit (still found in many older installations) may take many ms, depending on make, model, and the type of fault. And either type, even when set to its shortest possible time, will still take several milliseconds to respond.

Do arc flash relays really work? What’s your opinion? Join the conversation below. 

Justin Mahaffey is sales engineer for Littelfuse, where he helps customers improve uptime and worker electrical safety. His experience includes heavy industrial applications such as oil and gas drilling and electric power utilities. Early in his career, Mahaffey worked as both a test and product engineer.

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.