Think Tank Blasts Cuomo's Witch Hunt Against Intel
Antitrust Lawsuit Threatens Innovation, Consumers
WASHINGTON, D.C., November 4, 2009 - Today New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against Intel Corporation. The suit, which accuses Intel of violating antitrust laws through "coercion" and "bullying," comes amidst an ongoing competition policy battle between Intel and the European Union over a record-shattering $1.5 billion fine that the EU levied against Intel earlier this year.
Competition policy analysts at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based public interest group, were sharply critical of the lawsuit.
"Mr. Cuomo's suit is just the latest example of the New York Attorney General using his authority to make headlines at consumers' expense. This baseless attack against Intel will only delay innovation in the computer chip market," argued Ryan Radia, Associate Director of Technology Studies.
"Few markets are as vibrant and innovative as the processor market," Radia stated. "During the very period that Mr. Cuomo alleges Intel was engaged in‘anti-competitive' behavior, desktop computer processors more than doubled in performance per dollar every two years. By objective measures, the performance of the processor market has been nothing short of spectacular."
"Mr. Cuomo's suit rests on the fundamentally flawed assumption that Intel's high market share is indicative of market control. In fact, Intel and archrival AMD have been competing fiercely for over a decade, and both firms continue to invest billions of dollars each year in researching and developing faster, more efficient chips," Radia observed.
"Intel's pricing and rebate policies are legitimate, pro-consumer business practices in a vibrant market setting," said Wayne Crews, Vice President for Policy. "Intel is disciplined not only by its competitors but by downstream business customers like Dell and Hewlett-Packard. Ironically, the only barriers to computer makers ganging up against Intel are antitrust laws themselves," Crews pointed out. "Antitrust laws steer markets in unnatural directions, thwarting the evolution of commerce and creating instabilities in entire sectors."
"Abusive monopoly power is supposed to result in a reduction of quantity sold and an increase in prices," said Crews. "Yet the exact opposite phenomenon has occurred in the processor marketplace. In the dynamic high-tech sector, firms can sustain market share only through perpetual innovation."
From MBT, read: Intel: How to create a lower-cost supply chain in 7 steps and Tech giants push the green data center .
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.