Testing Toyota


I have been following some of the discussions related to Toyotas lately. (In the interests of full disclosure, my wife drives a 2008 Prius and my daughter drives a 2008 Matrix. My wife is out of town at the moment, so I drove the Prius to work this morning. I did give a quick inspection to the floor mat and all seemed fine. I’ve driven it enough to think the concept of “rapid acceleration” is not in its vocabulary. The Matrix has a manual transmission, and I believe my daughter is a skilled enough driver to push in the clutch if necessary.)

Yesterday there was an article in the Chicago Tribune suggesting that Toyota is launching a counter offensive trying to discredit the efforts of David Gilbert (Southern Illinois University) who testified to congress that there are circumstances under which Toyota’s electronic throttle control can put the car into runaway mode. In response, Toyota’s contention is that Gilbert had to go to great lengths to make the controller fail. Its engineers demonstrated that if you go that far, any car’s controller will also freak out. They proved the point by using the same techniques on controllers from seven other vehicles, including Ford, Chevrolet, and Honda. All flunked the test.

“This is very interesting and timely,” you say, “but what does it have to do with process industries?” A fair question. The situation makes me wonder how such devices are designed and tested. Might it not be interesting to subject such a throttle controller to the same rigorous testing as a field device or PLC that is intended for a safety system? What would happen if Toyota or any automotive manufacturer submitted such critical system components to TÜV or a similar lab in order to get a SIL rating? (If you aren’t familiar with SIL ratings and what they mean, read this article.) Should a car’s throttle assembly have to pass a SIL 3 rating? SIL 2?

Needless to say, a safety PLC that helps keep a refinery from blowing up needs such rigorous testing. Maybe a few other things do as well.

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.