Switching PM gears for fast and furious maintenance
CMMS conventional wisdom tells us to schedule our machine preventive maintenance items on a calendar, but what if it's too early to check and replace a part?
CMMS conventional wisdom tells us to schedule our machine preventive maintenance (PM) items on a calendar just like we do for our car tune-ups. It's been 90 days, so it must be time to re-calibrate the auger in the extruder, or replace the impeller on a centrifugal pump. But what if it's too early to check and replace a part?
While being reactive and waiting to make repairs only after equipment fails hurts productivity, changing parts before the end of their run is also a waste of time and money. If you're doing too many PMs based on a calendar and you're wasting precious maintenance resources to do the work, you may want to consider more efficient options. To preserve equipment and ensure plant floor machines are fully operational and reliable, safe, and long-lasting, consider more proactive PMs.
PMs come in many shapes and sizes. Meter readings offer greater PM intelligence. Let's say a piece of equipment has fallen below the acceptable performance threshold, slowing down production and reducing output. Meter trending may show that widget output falls after 600 hrs of continued use, which may exceed the manufacturer's recommendation for replacing components. Meter readings to periodically check production volumes and perform the necessary maintenance tasks trump calendar-based PMs, which remain static as production volumes change over time. And you risk scheduling too few or too frequent PMs that won't parallel the growth of the company.
Another useful PM, condition-based maintenance (CBM), is based on the health of your asset. CMB-based PMs can prevent degradation of components in the equipment. CBM incorporates real-time data about machine health so that maintenance work can be done when it is actually necessary—and not according to a rigid calendar schedule. Monitoring machine health by controlling oil corrosion with a PM to change filters prevents failures.
Checking oil levels, contaminants, temperatures, vibration levels, (among others) all fall under CBMs. A civil engineering company that manages wastewater treatment plants has to regularly test conditions of its centrifugal blowers for alignment, temperatures, vibrations, etc. Each blower has a gearbox with an oil capacity of 27 gal. CBM tests allowed the maintenance team to analyze lab results for detecting metal in the oil, resulting in less frequent oil changes—and lower maintenance costs.
This way the condition of the equipment drives the schedule—not the calendar.
Read more articles by Paul on his blog, Lachance on CMMS.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.