Study tries to model manufacturing innovation
A new Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI study provides a unique model of the main determinants of product and process innovation for the U.S. manufacturing sector. The model allows companies and public policy makers to have more certainty in addressing a long-standing dilemma – how to measure innovation and thereby identify appropriate incentives and resources for its promotion.
A new Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI study provides a unique model of the main determinants of product and process innovation for the U.S. manufacturing sector. The model allows companies and public policy makers to have more certainty in addressing a long-standing dilemma %%MDASSML%% how to measure innovation and thereby identify appropriate incentives and resources for its promotion. Additionally, the model provides the potential capability to focus on developing a strategic framework and a domestic policy response to address increasing global competition.
“Nothing is more important to the success of American industry in the global economy than leading in innovation,” said Thomas J. Duesterberg, president and CEO of the Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI. “Only by maintaining our historical lead in both product and process innovation can we meet the ever-broadening global challenge. This paper shows us, in a rigorous empirical way, what policies we need to encourage and nurture the innovative process.”
MAPI economic consultant Jeremy Leonard and MAPI economist Cliff Waldman conclude that the level of the science and engineering workforce, expenditures on frontier science in academic institutions, and manufacturing research and development outlays are key components of product innovation.
A key finding in the paper is the relationship between frontier science research at academic institutions and innovation. The study reveals a five-year lag in the process model and a six-year lag in the product model from initial expenditures on basic university R&D to industrial benefit. This accounts for research time, publications, dissemination and absorption by the private sector. “But clearly,” the report concludes, “the investment pays off.
- Events & Awards
- Magazine Archives
- Oil & Gas Engineering
- Salary Survey
- Digital Reports
- Survey Prize Winners
- CFE Edu
Annual Salary Survey
Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.
There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.
But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.
Read more: 2015 Salary Survey