Sometimes its personnel
Sometimes it’s easy to forget about the people aspect of control systems. Multiple regulatory rules, laws, and internal procedures require that people who perform shop floor actions are unequivocally identified, are authorized to perform the actions, and have valid training or qualifications to perform the actions.
Sometimes it’s easy to forget about the people aspect of control systems. Multiple regulatory rules, laws, and internal procedures require that people who perform shop floor actions are unequivocally identified, are authorized to perform the actions, and have valid training or qualifications to perform the actions. Because personnel information is usually maintained in multiple IT and control systems, it is a key area of exchanged information.
Which system checks and confirms the identity of personnel in your environment? Is the master information in a network security system, in an IT user management system, in an HR system, in a control system, or in all four systems? Many organizations are moving to a single sign-on (SSO) environment in which a user logs in once and all applications have access to the user’s credentials through an SSO management application.
The leading SSO system is based on the Liberty Alliance consortium ( www.projectliberty.org ) and uses the OASIS XML based security services ( www.oasis-open.org ) called the Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML). Unfortunately, many control applications have their own user account management and require manual synchronization with the other systems. It is common, but not desirable, that control systems contain old accounts for people who have left the company or moved to other positions.
A critical Manufacturing IT function is to keep the control system security up-to-date with changes in personnel information. Manufacturing IT teams should have a “tickler” system to remind them to make periodic updates, or they may subscribe to RSS feeds from the HR system to be informed of pertinent personnel changes.
Identifying a person and determining if they are authorized to use a system to take a control action is often not enough. Regulations and company policies may also require that the person is qualified, or appropriately trained, to take the action. Some manufacturing execution systems (MESs) provide a training and qualification tracking function. This provides a real-time check of qualifications before a user is allowed to take an action.
No real-time availability
The qualification information may also be maintained in a corporate-training tracking system, or in the HR system. The corporate systems normally do not have the real-time availability or up-to-date data required for just-in-time qualification checking; therefore, MES and training-tracking systems must share information and be synchronized. Some corporate policies may also require that qualification certification information, such as state issued professional license numbers, are included in production records. This is another type of information that is usually maintained in HR systems but is required in the real-time operational systems.
There is a standard format for exchanging this information using the B2MML Personnel Schema standard ( www.wbf.org ), but few vendors currently support this functionality, so most synchronization of qualification information is performed manually.
In addition to authorization to take an action and qualification to take an action, there is also the question of who is nearby to take an action. Location information may be managed by a door or room security system that tracks entry and exit, or through geographic positioning system (GPS) tracking of cell phones tied to a physical security system. This information is extremely useful to assign actions, alarms, and events to operators based on their location. Personnel location information is also of vital importance in case of emergencies or hazardous conditions. The personnel schemas can also be used to exchange this information.
Often, keeping personnel information in sync between business and control systems is a low priority task—until inspectors or lawyers get involved. Make sure that the personnel information in your control systems is up to date and in sync with corporate systems to prevent any future personal problems with personnel information.
Dennis Brandl is president of BR&L Consulting in Cary, NC, email@example.com .
- Events & Awards
- Magazine Archives
- Oil & Gas Engineering
- Salary Survey
- Digital Reports
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.