Smart motor controller for robot designers, AGVs
Roboteq's XDC2230 smart motor controller is capable of directly driving two dc motors up to 120 A each and the controller's two channels can be operated independently or combined to set the direction and rotation of an automated guided vehicle (AGV).
Roboteq's XDC2230 smart motor controller is capable of directly driving two dc motors up to 120 A each. The XDC2230 is targeted at high power motor control applications like mobile robot designers and automatic guided vehicles (AGVs).
The controller's two channels can be operated independently or combined to set the direction and rotation of a vehicle by coordinating the motors on each side (tank-like steering). The motors may be operated in open or closed loop speed or position modes. The XDC2230 includes inputs for two Quadrature Encoders for precise speed and traveled distance measurement. The XDC2230 can be interfaced directly to Roboteq's MGS1600 Magnetic Guide Sensor, allowing an AGV to be built using only two components.
The XDC2230 accepts commands from analog joystick, standard R/C radio, USB, RS232 or CANbus interfaces and incorporates a Basic Language Interpreter capable of executing over 50,000 Basic instructions per second. This feature can be used to write powerful scripts for adding custom functions, or for developing automated systems without the need for an external PLC or microcomputer.
- Edited by CFE Media. See more Control Engineering motor and drive products.
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.