Servo motor versus induction motor systems
Cover story tutorial: Choosing between permanent magnet servo motor or induction motor systems depends on application performance criteria. Consider this advice for the best fit. See more information and photos online, including comparative table.
Motor selection: When deciding between permanent magnet (PM) servo motor or induction motor systems, consider dynamic performance, torque density, inertia matching, and control schemes. Choosing between servos and induction motors depends on the level of application performance and costs. Induction motors are simple, low cost, and straightforward.
Servo motors can offer higher performance, faster speeds, and smaller sizes. PM synchronous motors offer advantages on high-energy- consuming and high-dynamic applications, compared to induction motors. Variable frequency drives used with asynchronous motors also can be used with synchronous servo motors, producing higher efficiencies than an asynchronous motor, using perhaps 30% less energy in positioning applications.
Induction motor systems (lower cost, rugged, reliable, and well known) can offer an alternative to servo motor systems (the traditional, established solution) for certain applications. This, of course, is based on similar electronic controls being used (with the latest technology and approximately the same cost), leaving the cost of motors the differentiating issue.
Thanks to Frank Bartos, Control Engineering contributing editor, and to the four authors below, for the information above. In this issue, “Inside Machines” has a direct drive rotary motor technologies article.
- Edited by Mark T. Hoske, content manager, CFE Media, Control Engineering, mhoske@cfemedia. com.
The articles below were in the cover story in a shorter format. Links to the longer online versions follow.
Permanent magnet synchronous motors offer significant advantages on high-energy-consuming and high-dynamic applications, compared to induction motors. See table, photo gallery.
Motor selection: When deciding on the use of permanent magnet (PM) servomotors or induction motor systems, consider dynamic performance, torque density, inertia matching, and control schemes.
Choosing between servos and induction motors depends on the level of performance required by the application and costs. Induction motors are simple, low-cost, and straightforward. Servos can offer higher performance, faster speeds, and smaller sizes.
Drives and designs can make synchronous servo motors more efficient
Information in the last section of the cover story was summarized from this article. Energy-saving drive solutions - Industrial Energy Management: Intelligent concepts cut costs and protect the environment while saving energy; high-efficiency energy conversion and recovery of braking energy also can help.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.