Serialization, where automation and IT collide

Engineering and IT Insight: If your company has a serialization project, or is starting one, to prevent counterfeits, ensure the manufacturing IT and automation groups are involved early in the project.

01/21/2014


Serialization can help prevent counterfeits but requires that automation and IT work together. Counterfeits are everywhere, from watches on the street corner to apparent high-end clothing sold from the back of trucks. Counterfeits hurt manufacturers’ profits and can harm their reputation, but when counterfeits invade food, pharmaceutical, and mechanical device markets, they also can affect health and safety. Most people are aware of the dangers of counterfeit drugs causing the deaths of thousands, and in some countries counterfeit medicines can be more common than real medicines.

Death by counterfeit                                

According to the World Health Organization’s estimates, 10%-15% of the world’s drug supply and probably about 1% of the U.S. supply is counterfeit. Food counterfeiting in China has resulted in multiple deaths due to contaminated ingredients with prosecutions for criminal offenses. In July 2013 French authorities reported seizing 100 tons of fish, seafood, and frog legs whose origin was incorrectly labeled; 1.2 tons of fake truffle shavings; 1100 pounds of inedible pastries; false Parmesan cheese from America and Egypt; and liquor from a Dutch company falsely marketed as tequila. In Britain fake vodka was found to contain bleach and high levels of methanol, and engine oil was found in olive oil.

Mechanical device counterfeits can also be deadly when they are used in automobiles, trucks, ships, airplanes, turbines, and rotating machinery. Substandard materials in counterfeit mechanical devices can fail, often with catastrophic consequences. For example, the Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India has reported that up to 20% of all road accidents that occur in India are due to counterfeit auto parts. 

Unique identification

Considering the health and safety risks due to counterfeiting, it is no wonder that serialization is becoming either a regulatory requirement or a tool to reduce liability risk. Serialization is defined as the labeling of each salable unit with a globally unique identification (ID) so that the unit can be tracked through the supply chain and counterfeits can be identified. The unique IDs are semi-random; a counterfeiter cannot simply pick numbers that are similar to real IDs. Serialization on food products is usually applied to the packaging, but some foods, such as eggs and fruit, are actually individually labeled. Pharmaceutical serialization is used to label the packages with printed labels or laser encoding for medical devices. Mechanical device serialization is often applied directly to the mechanical devices, such as laser encoding seen on bearings, gaskets, and tires, or metal labels applied directly to large devices.

Serialization is an IT project because the business must assign and record the unique IDs and make them available to regulatory authorities and supply chain partners. Serialization is also an automation project because the unique IDs are attached to devices at the back end of production lines or the front end of packaging lines. Serialization projects are where automation and IT are forced to work together.

Many companies are implementing serialization as an IT project with little or no concern for how the IDs will actually be applied to the devices. They consider serialization as just a printing problem. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) vendors, such as SAP and Oracle, provide serialization systems that can be used to create unique, semi-random IDs; associate the IDs with specific production sites, products, and material lots; and share the information with supply chain partners. A typical implementation will periodically assign a set of numbers to a product and download the numbers to a shop floor system. When production and packaging is complete, the shop floor system will send back the specific lot numbers and product IDs assigned to the serialization IDs. The shop floor systems will also send back the lists of unused and scrapped IDs, because it is important to track the scrapped IDs so they cannot be used in counterfeit products.

ID integration

Usually the IT department hands off the serialization project when the IDs are sent to the shop floor systems, but that is often where automations problems occur. Implementing serialization in production or packaging is not just slapping a new label on a box, but it usually involves physical integration of the existing automated production or packaging line with the labeling and verification equipment. When IDs are applied, they must also be checked, so vision systems must be added to the lines after the labeling operation. The labeling and verification systems must be integrated into the overall control system and integrated with the ERP systems to obtain IDs.

Usually there is an MES (manufacturing execution system) that receives the IDs from the ERP system and makes them available to each production or packaging line’s labeling and verification system. The MES then also collects the used and unused IDs and periodically sends these back up to the ERP system. Automation is involved in the physical integration of the systems and with the IT integration, and because many existing systems are validated, it often requires revalidation of the updated system.

Automation and IT collide in serialization projects when companies consider them to be only IT projects, without allocating time and effort to the shop floor part of the project. If the IT organization or management thinks that serialization is just adding printers in production lines, then the project will end up late and over budget. If your company has a serialization project, or is starting one, make sure the manufacturing IT and automation groups are involved early in the project. Every production line may require a unique automation solution, with different labeling and verification devices and technologies. Only with automation and IT working together will your serialization project be a success and protect your customers.

- Dennis Brandl is president of BR&L Consulting in Cary, N.C. His firm focuses on manufacturing IT. Edited by Mark T. Hoske, content manager, CFE Media, Control Engineering and Plant Engineering, mhoske(at)cfemedia.com.

ONLINE

This posted version contains more information than the January 2014 print / digital edition issue of Control Engineering.

At www.controleng.com, search Brandl for more on related topics.

See other articles at www.controleng.com/archives.

See other Manufacturing IT articles.

http://www.controleng.com/channels/manufacturing-it.html 



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Bring focus to PLC programming: 5 things to avoid in putting your system together; Managing the DCS upgrade; PLM upgrade: a step-by-step approach
Balancing the bagging triangle; PID tuning improves process efficiency; Standardizing control room HMIs
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.