Self tuning has its limits
Regarding Self-Tuning Control (July 2007 by Vance Van Doren). A linear control loop will not develop a limit cycle — its cycle will either decay or expand, depending on whether loop gain is below or above unity, respectively. Limit cycling requires a nonlinear function somewhere in the loop to limit the amplitude of the oscillation, and the waveform is typically non-sinusoidal.
Regarding Self-Tuning Control (July 2007 by Vance Van Doren). A linear control loop will not develop a limit cycle — its cycle will either decay or expand, depending on whether loop gain is below or above unity, respectively. Limit cycling requires a nonlinear function somewhere in the loop to limit the amplitude of the oscillation, and the waveform is typically non-sinusoidal. Changing the tuning of a controller in a limit-cycling loop usually does not eliminate the cycling, but only affects its amplitude and period, rendering self-tuning ineffective. The ineffectiveness of tuning efforts, along with a non-sinusoidal waveform, should direct the user to look for and eliminate the nonlinear element, such as valve deadband.
Greg Shinskey, email@example.com
I could quibble over your assertion that self-tuning is ineffective because other phenomena can cause limit cycling, but I believe for different reasons that self-tuners are hard to implement successfully. In general, though, I agree with your observations. Limit cycling can only occur if a limiter of some sort (such as a valve’s maximum and minimum positions) to keep an unstable oscillation constant. Still, the information available from a limit cycle waveform can be used to tune a loop, as Ziegler and Nichols showed in 1942.
Vance VanDoren, firstname.lastname@example.org
Greg responds: I agree that a limit cycle caused by an on-off controller, or by excessive proportional gain, can be used to tune a controller, and some auto-tuners operate this way. But it would not make sense for a self-tuner to wait until the valve cycled between its limits before retuning. And for a velocity-limited valve, the period of that large limit cycle could be much longer than that of a small-amplitude cycle. However, some limit cycles do not drive the controller output to its limits. A very common limit cycle is caused by valve deadband in a PI level-control loop. The manipulated flow cycles in a clipped sine wave, well within the limits of the valve, with amplitude and period varying with the P and I settings. No combination of those settings will eliminate the cycle. A self-tuner will fail in this loop because there is no stable state.
TalkBack is the online comment section of www.controleng.com . Add your opinion to this discussion or any article online by scrolling to the bottom and clicking the button. Comments may appear in print, as space allows.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.