Safety first: Put up your guard

05/01/2013


At-risk equipment

When the client launched its 2009 zero-fatality program, there were company manufacturing facilities with equipment that required updating to meet new occupational and machine safety standards. Additionally, multiple original equipment manufacturer (OEM) safety systems existed; therefore, the implementation of safety standards was inconsistent.

As part of its strategic plan, the company partnered with preferred vendors to assist with a company-wide risk mitigation of its equipment.

The client’s dedicated safety team developed standards of safety for all equipment, which included:

  • Conforming to safety categories based on the risk assessment, maintenance standards, operational consistency, and troubleshooting procedures
  • Preferred vendors, such as Polytron and E2M, were selected to support the safety initiatives. Selection was made based on the vendor’s critical understanding of how the risk assessment translates into applied machine safety systems to lower the risk score.
  • Training meetings were held with preferred vendors, key technology suppliers, and OEMs to share the new standards and requirements to support the machine safety initiative. Those trained were then brought alongside the safety team to provide support in the risk mitigation effort.

Risk mitigation for older equipment

JB Titus and Associates portrays the Risk Reduction process depicting the tolerable risk scenario most typically followed to determine if the risk is acceptable or requires some action for risk mitigation. In the case study here, a risk assessment was conMachine safety modifications are typically conducted in one of two ways. With new equipment, the modifications are designed into the equipment; for older equipment, either in-depth modifications are required to the controls or modifications are added onto the equipment.

Based on the new safety standards, the safety team began the risk assessments for existing equipment to identify the greatest risks that required mitigation. Polytron and other strategic technology partners provided support for the risk assessments.

Some OEMs, who originally provided the older equipment, were contacted to assist in the safety modifications. What Polytron found was that due to the extensive changes to be made to the equipment, it would be cost prohibitive to use the original OEM.

Oftentimes, the OEM needed the equipment shipped back to its facility to perform the upgrades, an alternative that would not be considered due to the increased loss of production and costs. The manufacturer decided the best option was to engage Polytron and its partner E2M to execute the more engineering-intensive machine safety upgrades for older equipment, some of which was more than 20 years old.

Older equipment presents more complex issues, such as legacy control architectures that can’t support new safety technology, outdated utilities, and the constraints of other systems that interface with the equipment.

These factors challenge the project team to understand and define the full scope and scale of what is needed. Definition is difficult due to the unknowns that will likely be uncovered as the project begins. It is extremely important to have a thorough plan identifying all possible contingencies in each area prior to beginning the work.

Machine safety projects are more successful when a systems integrator with machine safety expertise is involved. This expertise allows the manufacturer to realize benefits such as:

  • Understanding of standards and how to effectively apply technology.
  • Minimized machine downtime and impacted systems due to a well-developed plan.
  • Cost-effective changes that reduce the risk level of the equipment within company allowable limits.
  • Increased equipment efficiency in most cases.

Machine safety upgrades offer an opportunity to address operational efficiency as the safety project requires a complete overhaul of older equipment. While the client may not use the project to increase efficiency, the safety initiative often results in improvements.

This is effectively measured in reduced mean-time-to-repair (MTTR). Since the equipment now has isolated safety/operational zones, repairs to the equipment or clearing faults can be accomplished in the affected zone without impacting the operation of the rest of the machine.

High risk palletizer area

Risk assessments targeted the palletizer area as a higher risk area for a stand-alone safety project. Polytron conducted the project in collaboration with its partner E2M. Consistent with Polytron’s machine safety mitigation approach, Polytron and E2M began to conduct the remediation process on the equipment in the palletizer area based on the company’s risk assessment.

The team reviewed the risk assessment provided and began the task of identifying the modifications to lower the risk level of each hazard to bring it within the company’s stated range of tolerance.

A functional specification was developed by Polytron and E2M addressing the specific areas identified in the risk assessment and presented the recommended modifications to the customer. The goal in the functional specification was to adjust and modify to lower the risk level on each area and ensure that changes did not inhibit machine operation. The modifications also provided a consistent system with machine safety engineering and standardized automation, reducing downtime and increasing availability to diagnostics.

The Polytron and E2M team reviewed the design, plan, and cost for the entire project and upon approval from the manufacturer began work.

Safety implementation

Scheduling the implementation of the machine safety project requires extensive coordination due to the evident downtime of the equipment. Older equipment requires considerable updating to bring into compliance and can incur as much as two to four weeks’ downtime based on project complexity.

With machine safety mitigation, it is a trade-off between the cost of new panels and components versus lost time in production to modify existing controls. In this case, the client was fortunate to have parallel systems that provided alternative routing for the line to minimize the production impact. In most cases, the equipment safety upgrade project impacts the entire line with unavoidable downtime.

The total project included:

  • Applying standard controls software components, provided by the customer, including state machine and PLC program templates, and standard HMI faceplates
  • Adding technology as an enabler: Safety-rated components such as safety PLCs, contactors, switches (interlocks), VFDs, light curtains, door switches, e-stop push buttons, and safety rated sensors
  • Creating isolated safety zones to more efficiently operate and maintain equipment.

Equipment updates and modifications were completed and validation and start-up were coordinated with the client. Validation of the technology and physical machine guarding were checked and verified for machine safety compliance, and risk mitigation was finalized in documentation.

Safety climate change, training

Risk mitigation creates necessary change for everyone’s protection, and, in many cases, provides operational improvement. For operators, a machine that has been upgraded with new safety features should be approached as new equipment—machine operations and maintenance has changed, the HMI is new, the logic is different, and new technology has been added. The updates create the need for training and documentation to ensure safety upgrades deliver the intended outcome.

As a result of the changes made to the equipment for our client, new manuals were generated outlining new safety procedures and changes in operator tasks. Polytron’s training team conducted specialized safety training for the updated equipment. For instance, procedures for isolating hazards within a safety zone changed. Isolated safety zones enable the operator to stop the impacted area, access the jam and remove blockage, and restart the isolated zone.

Without training, the operator would continue to shut down the equipment as before, creating unnecessary downtime. Technology transfer and training is critical to the success of risk mitigation projects, for continuity of performance and increased safety of operations.

Palletizer machine safety upgrade

Equipment risk levels in the palletizer area were reduced to an acceptable level. This required applying guarding, new software, safety-rated components, and technology, and creating isolated safety zones for efficient operation and maintenance.

Training was conducted on the new machine operation. As a result, the workforce has integrated the new safety procedures and functionality into the regular maintenance and operation of the system.

This client continues to rely on Polytron and its partner E2M to execute machine safety projects identified in the risk assessment as the company’s EHS program progresses and other upgrades arise based on capital improvements involving targeted equipment.

Based on the company’s 2011 Sustainability report, since the initiation of the machine safety program in 2009, the company reported zero fatalities in 2010 and 2011. Also 69% of the major findings from the global assessments have been closed; 95% of the corrective action and preventive action from fatalities have been closed.

- Sean Daswani, PE, is senior electrical engineer, Polytron. Edited by Mark T. Hoske, content manager, CFE Media, Control Engineering and Plant Engineering, mhoske(at)cfemedia.com

Go Online

Read the related Control Engineering blog post: Is OSHA okay with my 'acceptable' risk mitigation?

Polytron provides more about machine safety culture change.


<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

Mohammed , Non-US/Not Applicable, United Arab Emirates, 05/08/13 12:04 AM:

1. Very Good subject.

2. Needs a specific training program.

2. What about ESD
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Bring focus to PLC programming: 5 things to avoid in putting your system together; Managing the DCS upgrade; PLM upgrade: a step-by-step approach
Balancing the bagging triangle; PID tuning improves process efficiency; Standardizing control room HMIs
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.