Risk assessment - A best practice for sustainable performance
Generally speaking, industry has awakened to the term, risk assessment. Yet, many companies dealing with machine safety seem to still be wrestling with issues like; when, why, if, and how often in actually implementing robust programs.
aGenerally speaking, industry has awakened to the term – Risk Assessment. Yet, many companies dealing with machine safety seem to still be wrestling with issues like; when, why, if, and how often in actually implementing robust programs. Suppliers wanting to help have geared education and consulting based activities to address these issues and to actually complete machine risk assessments for manufacturers. On the other hand, a few companies have actually implemented the risk assessment process into their safety culture and it’s become a “best practice”.
To make this transition, it’s my opinion that companies need to openly understand and address a host of critical related terms. Examples of these terms include:
- Hazard – a potential source of damage or harm
- Risk – the probability that damage or injury will occur
- Acceptable risk – a level of (reduced) risk which has a likelihood and severity of injury or damage that’s deemed as low as reasonably achievable
- Residual risk – that risk which remains after all risk reduction measures have been applied
And, one of the biggest stumbling blocks I’ve experienced is getting companies to acknowledge the concept of residual risk and that residual risk will never equal zero.
With that said, it seems that the most successful companies to achieve implementing the risk assessment process as a best practice have done so because they’ve integrated risk reduction methodologies into their work systems and processes. This is a proactive approach to designing in safety and mitigation techniques as a continuous improvement process which consistently reduces residual risk over time. In my opinion, reducing residual risk over time can lead to sustainable safety performance improvements. Thus – risk assessment becomes a best practice for sustainable performance.
Let’s hear your ideas? What does it take for companies to establish safety as a sustainable performance? How can companies create and/or modify a proactive safety culture?
Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Risk Assessment – A Best Practice For Sustainable Performance
Did you see the Safety Integration Webcast?
Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.
- Events & Awards
- Magazine Archives
- Oil & Gas Engineering
- Salary Survey
- Digital Reports
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.