Absences should be covered under act In the "Human Side of Engineering" in the April 2002 issue, the scenario depicted in the story "Is absence due to chronic ailment justified?" leads to a shaky decision by Plant Engineer Bert Benson. The absences described could very well be covered under the Family/Medical Leave Act.
Absences should be covered under act
In the "Human Side of Engineering" in the April 2002 issue, the scenario depicted in the story "Is absence due to chronic ailment justified?" leads to a shaky decision by Plant Engineer Bert Benson. The absences described could very well be covered under the Family/Medical Leave Act. The act provides protection to employees who are absent from work due to a qualifying absence. Qualified absences are defined as:
The employee is adding a child to the family by birth, adoption or placement of a foster child, or is caring for the child within one year of adding the child to the family.
The employee requests time off or claims absence for care of a spouse, child, or parent with a serious health condition.
The employee is unable to perform his or her job due to his or her own serious health condition.
Absence from work for more than three consecutive days that involves a course of medical treatment.
Incapacity caused by a chronic or long-term condition that requires continued treatment by a health care provider.
The annual hour allowance for FMLA is 480 hours. Ms. Greene's 22 absences last year only amount to 176 hours (264 hours if she normally works 12-hour shifts). FMLA qualifiable absences can be continuous or intermittent.
Using these definitions, it would seem that Ms. Greene would qualify for FMLA protection due to her own serious, chronic health condition that requires continued treatment by a health care provider. Mr. Benson should take this into consideration before making his final decision whether or not to fire Ms. Greene.
— Joel Belew
Don't kid around with compressed air
This comment concerns one of the situations written about in the May 2002 "Human Side of Engineering." In the portion "Safety violation: Be sure to take a hard and firm line," blowing a worker's hat off his head with an air hose was described as "harmless kidding around." I disagree with that evaluation. Compressed air is a dangerous force and should never be intentionally directed at anyone's head, face, or any other part of the body. Dirt or metal chips could be picked up by the air stream and imbedded in the skin or eyes. At the very worst case, air could be injected in to the blood stream through an open cut.
—Michael R. Dunlap
A serious health condition is one that generally requires:
- Events & Awards
- Magazine Archives
- Oil & Gas Engineering
- Salary Survey
- Digital Reports
- Survey Prize Winners
- CFE Edu
Annual Salary Survey
Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.
There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.
But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.
Read more: 2015 Salary Survey