Production strategies: Batch scheduling in a lean manufacturing world
The concept of creating batches in the manufacturing process is prevalent in many industries. In fact, economies of scale demand it. But there's good news and bad news for companies using batching. That's why it pays to know more about the systems specifically designed to address the needs of companies that must make to order while continuing to run batches. <br/>
The concept of creating batches in the manufacturing process is prevalent in many industries. In fact, economies of scale demand it. An example of this would be a paper mill needing to mix a vat of a specific pulp from which orders belonging to a certain product group can be made. It is not economically feasible to mix a vat for each customer’s order.
Good news and bad news arises for manufacturers using batching. The good news is that as long as they can survive using buffers and
The bad news is that to reduce waste and move toward a demand-driven, lean manufacturing model, they will need a completely different tool set. Otherwise things will become unmanageable.
Still, the best news is that systems are specifically designed to address the needs of those manufacturers
First, the problem
Lean manufacturing means eliminating waste and one way to quickly eliminate waste is to move toward a make-to-order, demand-driven business model.
The price MRP systems pay when grouping like-orders together is that they create work orders that cannot be easily tied to actual customer demand. This is not a problem in a make-to-stock world, but it's a major headache in the make-to-order world.
The key component needed in the make-to-order world is a scheduling system that schedules and tracks production at the sales-order level. This isn't really an issue in machine shops where each operation of each order is scheduled independently.
A simplified way to think of batch scheduling is to compare it to the way airlines schedule passengers. The batch is the flight, and the number of seats on the plane limits the size of that batch. Passengers are the orders, and the time that each passenger can schedule the next phase of his/her journey is controlled by the time the flight is scheduled to arrive at its destination.
A Batch Scheduling System provides four essential capabilities:
1. Create and schedule batches;
2. Assign orders to batches;
3. Edit the batch contents; and
4. Schedule additional operations.
Create and schedule batches
The scheduler needs to predetermine the type and size of the batches and use the scheduling system to arrange the dates for the batches to run.
This can be done based on company policy, experience, or forecast. In some situations the system may need to create new batches to satisfy orders that cannot fit into an existing batch.
If four empty batches are created each with the same capacity and an expected duration of three hours, the schedule looks like this:
Assign orders to batches
When new orders are introduced into the scheduling system, there are three major rules that determine if these orders can fit into a batch:
1) Batch Capacity Rule
Most batches have a finite capacity. This rule determines whether enough capacity is available for an order. Capacity can be expressed in units, such as pieces, tons or hours.
2) Date Rule
This rule uses the date of the batch and the customer request date to determine the best batch to use.
3) Type Rules
Type rules compare one or more attributes of the order with one or more batch attributes to determine if the order can fit in a batch. This rule can be applied to anything from matching colors, sizes, or raw materials
As orders are assigned to batches, the schedule will effectively look like this:
Some manufacturers, such as those making high-pressure laminates, have an additional constraint. One batch may actually consist of a fixed number of books, so the system must be able to handle an additional layer of rules that controls the capacity at the book level and what orders can and cannot go into the same book.
Edit the batch contents
Since a batch appears as just one line on the Gantt chart, the scheduler needs a tool that provides views of both the orders in a batch and batch-specific data. This tool must allow the scheduler to drag orders in and out of batches without breaking any of the rules. The purpose of this tool is to enable fine-tuning. This tool will need the following capabilities:
• Drag and drop orders between batches.
• Allow scheduler to override rules.
• Pull orders from unscheduled box to batch.
• Split orders to spread over more than one batch.
• Create remake orders.
• Modify attributes of both orders and batches.
In the following software graphic, by clicking on the resource in the left-hand column, the Batch Editor shows the data for each batch such as the Steel Group and the Allocated Capacity .
By clicking on a batch a scheduler can see and modify order level data.
The Un-allocated Orders box shows the orders that have not yet been allocated to a batch. These can be sorted and dragged to a batch.
Schedule additional operations
In many cases, the scheduler must assign orders to additional operations such as finishing or packaging. This necessitates setting the start date of the finishing operation to the end date of the batch and then scheduling it. This allows the scheduling system to calculate completion date for each order. The Gantt chart below shows how the finishing operations for each order are tied to the time its batch completes at the furnace.
Such a system has some very attractive additional benefits:
1) It reduces nonvalue-add time on the front end of an order by enabling manufacturers to quickly provide clients with an accurate promise date.
2) Because batch scheduling works within a predetermined framework, it is less likely to react unpredictably to cascading changes.
3) Most of the number crunching is done by the system, so the scheduler has more time to evaluate and fine-tune the schedule.
4) It is easy to track the completion date of orders.
5) Additional functionality is available to let the scheduler make valid substitutes when faced with material shortages.
6) It provides a tool for capacity-constrained companies to synchronize schedules with business objectives by creating batches for high-margin products rather than promising delivery based on first come/first served.
As technology changes, the world looks toward customization. This dooms products to shorter life spans, and it becomes difficult to accurately forecast demand. Additionally, companies in Europe and North America consistently compete with low-cost mass production coming from places like China. By retooling companies to react faster to customer demand, the leaders will move away from a “sell-what-you-make” business model to a “make-what-you-sell” business model.
New systems like the one described here provide a way for companies to impact their bottom lines in a radical way that will give them a significant competitive advantage in their market.
Listed here are some industries that currently use this approach:
• High-pressure laminates
• Paper mills
• Steel mills
Other likely candidates include:
About the author: Mike Liddell is CEO of Suncoast Technology Partners , a Bradenton, Fla.-based consulting firm that specializes in helping manufacturers solve complex forecasting, planning, and scheduling problems.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.