Potential changes to commercial building code
A proposal has been made to the International Energy Conservation Code that would change the ways commercial buildings are constructed, potentially cutting energy costs by 25%.
Proposed changes to the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) have been made that would adjust the standards for commercial buildings, making them 20% to 25% more energy efficient . The proposal is being reviewed by the International Code Council .
Created by the New Buildings Institute (NBI) and the American Institute of Architects , the code changes focus on achieving carbon neutrality in buildings by 2030. This means adjustments to five aspects of a structure: building envelope, heating/cooling, lighting, quality assurance, and renewable power.
Within the proposal are several details about what the new IECC would state. Windows and doors would be specified to create insulation while eliminating excess heat, reducing HVAC costs. Efficient light fixtures and bulbs, as well as occupancy and daylight sensors, would be required as a way to save energy. And renewable energy would be required as a source of power in the building.
The proposal is based off a previous energy saving standard created by the NBI, Core Performance. Commercial building codes based on Core Performance have already been adopted by Massachusetts and are under consideration by other states and municipalities.
- Events & Awards
- Magazine Archives
- Oil & Gas Engineering
- Salary Survey
- Digital Reports
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.