PCs versus PLCs for process control
Soapbox: Don’t settle for faults inherent in PLCs and PCs. Take the best of each for a more effective hybrid system for process control, according to a software and hardware provider to the process industries.
PLCs have been an old-time favorite for automation and control. The top-down programs and input-output type of ladder logic offered reliable control of process. However, with the ever-growing need for production information and quality control, the inadequacies of the PLCs were exposed.
Enter the PC as a tool for automation and control. The PC, with its user friendly operating systems, looked more like a candidate to displace the PLCs. However, the reliability of the operating systems left a lot to be desired. If working on a word processing document and the PC freezes, it is simple to hit the reset button. This, however, is not an acceptable solution when a PC-controlled machine is reaching dangerous operating conditions. Hence the PC is not an answer for process control.
The PLC is inadequate when complex mathematics is required. PLCs do not handle image analysis well either. Even process control like temperature and pressure are not well handled by PLCs where high levels of accuracy are needed. This kind of temperature and pressure control is better left to intelligent field devices like dedicated temperature or pressure controllers. Recently PLCs have been benefitting from special process control modules that may be added to PLCs. One thing that PLCs do very well is discrete control like opening and closing valves. PLCs have been fairly efficient in positioning for robotics.
In short, the question is how to integrate the reliability of the PLC’s discrete control, the precise control of intelligent field devices, and the processing power of the PC. The obvious answer is a hybrid system with the PC as the supervisory device with delegated controls to the PLC and other field devices.
All calibration, data analysis, and data history are handled by the PC. The human machine interface is provided by the PC. Actual process control is carried out by the PLC and the field devices best suited for the application. With the advent of interdevice communication capabilities, hybrid control systems are more popular than ever.
This way the best capabilities of all the devices are safely leveraged for the best results. This model also lends itself to cloud-based remote control or data acquisition.
- Jacob George is application engineering manager at Turbomation, a company engaged in engineering and automation consultation for process control. Edited by Mark T. Hoske, CFE Media, Control Engineering, www.controleng.com.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.