Overcoming Ethernet’s limitations

Ethernet was designed as a way for computers to communicate over a single, shared cable so that businesses could connect systems to support programs and transfer data. The beauty of Ethernet is its ability to transfer copious amounts of data over the network very quickly, and to provide information to remote users.

03/01/2010


 

 

Ethernet was designed as a way for computers to communicate over a single, shared cable so that businesses could connect systems to support programs and transfer data. The beauty of Ethernet is its ability to transfer copious amounts of data over the network very quickly, and to provide information to remote users.

 

As industrial manufacturing markets began to see the advantages that Ethernet provided, many companies began to explore the possibility of implementing Ethernet on the manufacturing side of their operations. However, standard TCP/IP Ethernet was neither designed nor intended to be a control level network. Thus the debate began over how to make Ethernet work in the industrial control world.

 

Ethernet issues

Networks using the original Ethernet protocol standard communicate information by sending and receiving data packets via the Ethernet frame. A data packet can contain from 64 to 1,055 bytes of data at speeds of up to 1 GB per second and beyond. However, manufacturing industry users may have difficulty with this arrangement due to how the data are sent.

 

Ethernet is designed to send large amounts of data less frequently than control networks. Also, Ethernet is not deterministic %%MDASSML%% meaning that when data are sent from one point to another, a user cannot determine when the data will be received by the intended location. In most commercial applications this is not an issue because %%MDASSML%% unlike in manufacturing %%MDASSML%% the data sent and received are not time-sensitive.

 

The next issue manufacturing has faced in implementing Ethernet networks concerns how these networks suffer from latency issues %%MDASSML%% or what is referred to as jitter, in reference to the amount of time it takes data to be transmitted from one point to another. Due to network jitter, latency is not predictable; thus, data that might take 10 seconds to be received in one instance could take 30 seconds in another.

 

The issues with determinism, network latency and jitter are the largest concerns of applying Ethernet for the industrial control aspect of networking. This is because most control networks are designed to send small amounts of data through a network more frequently than Ethernet does. In addition, these control networks are often used for time-sensitive functions that require data to arrive in a controlled fashion.

 

Leveraging Ethernet benefits

 

Despite these issues, Ethernet offers several benefits when applied in a control environment. Despite the reduced frequency, Ethernet provides fast data transmission that proves advantageous in many manufacturing scenarios. As manufacturers require comprehensive, readily available information to make decisions quickly, the faster the necessary data can be passed to decision-makers, the quicker they can respond. Plus, Ethernet is inexpensive to apply, provides cost-saving advantages and offers lots of options for implementation in industrial plants.

 

One way that users can take advantage of Ethernet’s benefits is through distributed control, which takes network control and decentralizes it throughout the plant. With this arrangement, control is distributed among many controllers rather than one. In a traditional control network, a single master PLC is responsible for everything happening on the network.

 

The master PLC sends a command for some action to occur at another location. The receiver of this information obtains the request and performs the function that it has been instructed to do. In return, the receiver sends its response back to the master PLC indicating that the function has been completed. This standard implementation is exactly where the limitations of Ethernet come into play, as a time-sensitive request sent to a node on the network may be delayed due to network traffic: the more traffic (requests) on the network, the slower the node will respond.

 

Distributed control takes the responsibility of control from the main PLC to a decentralized location. In this way, each programmable gateway acts as its own controller, taking responsibility for the devices connected to it and passing along the data to a central PLC. The gateway reports to the master PLC, but the control is handled locally, which relieves the master of the full data load and reduces the amount of traffic on the network.

 

Another benefit users receive from this method is that the gateway will keep functioning even if the connection to the master is lost, so that the functions for which the gateway is responsible continue operating. When the connection to the PLC is restored, the data is automatically retrieved during the next scan of the system.

 

In addition to a distributed control network, another option for effectively applying Ethernet in manufacturing environments is to implement a subnetwork for control, with an Ethernet layer available for transferring the non-critical data. The programmable gateways used to facilitate this arrangement are designed to use a device level network below the Ethernet network and to manage local devices. At the same time, each gateway acts as the master on the subnetwork and a slave on the Ethernet network, making the data available to the Ethernet network.

 

These gateways allow users to bridge the gap between a control layer and a data layer. This is a viable option for users that have invested in a fieldbus infrastructure but would like to migrate to an Ethernet network. By using these gateways, the control layer remains on a fieldbus network, but the data are made available as if it is on an Ethernet platform. Consequently, users may still access information about manufacturing operations from the control network, enterprise intranet or anywhere the Internet is available %%MDASSML%% allowing users to take full advantage of the benefits Ethernet offers.

 

A distributed I/O system can be located near plant floor devices and used to monitor manufacturing systems, without requiring an additional enclosure.

 

Compact programmable gateways handle control locally. This gateway controls the temperature in a printing machine.

 



 



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.