Open systems: The foundation for a new era of BAS

04/01/2013


Dividing the vendor roles

Figure 3: The 4-Tier Open Architecture Model ensures fully transparent interoperability throughout the system. Courtesy: RBCG LLCAn open philosophy sets the stage for vendors to focus on their area of expertise and work with other providers to deliver a complete solution, one that allows building owners to select the right products and vendors for their needs. In this strategy, the integrator role is elevated to oversee the complete project and ensure the building owner's objectives while separating the vendor roles so no one vendor is supplying the entire solution. Many building owners have implemented a multi-tier system architecture that defines these roles, where tier one is the sensor/actuator level; tier two is the field devices, such as the controllers; tier three is the in-building communications and connectivity level including device communication protocols; and tier four is the IT and enterprise infrastructure including user interfaces, both local and remote, data collection, and analysis. By utilizing the four-tier model, a check-and-balance system is put into place that ensures fully transparent interoperability throughout the system.

Embracing IT

The proliferation of IT into nearly every aspect of our daily life illustrates just how efficient and productive we can be with data readily available to us. The BAS industry is no different. As building owners discover what it means to have an open system, they see how intelligent decisions based on usage data positively impact the bottom line. While the definition of "open" may differ from one person to another, the common thread is data and its level of interoperability and accessibility. Couple this with an open protocol that facilitates the access to data across different systems and platforms, and this opens the door for the facility and IT departments to cooperate in the design, implementation, and management of the BAS.

Access to data from anywhere requires even greater support in the base system specification. Tying a BAS system into the facility IP network may seem simple and straightforward, but as soon as the IT department gets involved, a host of issues become exposed as the BAS system encroaches into the IT space. More and more control devices feature native IP access ports, requiring a fixed IP address. The IT department must be aware of and prepared for increased bandwidth utilization and, of particular importance, the security risks.

In 2004, the U.S Army Corps of Engineers published the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications, a definitive specification guideline that identifies building and integration requirements with the ultimate goal of creating "one integrated, multi-vendor system with no future dependence on any one contractor or controls vendor." The guideline encourages competitive bidding at all levels of procurement, and it has been adopted by thousands of installations nationwide. According to Will White, lead project engineer for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, "Security on our building systems is critical, and we are actively and aggressively defining the systems and standards to ensure the highest level of security is enabled. This may put an additional burden on the integrators and their vendors, but will enable us to expand our strategy into a fully enterprise-based solution rather than the current, single-premise-based solution."

Efforts within several standards groups are engaged in defining the hardware and software requirement for various levels of security. SGIP 2.0, Inc., is providing a national framework for coordinating all Smart Grid stakeholders in an effort to accelerate standards harmonization and advance the Interoperability of Smart Grid devices and systems, including security issues for tying the smart building into the Smart Grid. Other organizations, including LonMark International, ASHRAE, OASIS, and others, have developed security task forces to begin addressing the specific issues faced by building automation systems.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.