Open-source radio technology: Now available for process engineering

Following the technological progress of fieldbus in process automation, the next development step in field communication is that of solutions involving radio technology. Can radio technology be used on an “across the board” basis? Based on open standards, the HART Communication Foundation provides the answer with WirelessHART.

09/15/2008


Following the technological progress of fieldbus in process automation, the next development step in field communication is that of solutions involving radio technology. Can radio technology be used on an “across the board” basis? Based on open standards, the HART Communication Foundation provides the answer with Wireless HART.

WirelessHART now available

Wireless HART is built on the widely-used HART standard, as evidenced by 20 million installed HART-compatible field devices. HART was originally conceived as an extension of the common 4-20 mA current loop, in order to provide field devices with greater functionality.

The next step in the HART evolution has arrived. The Wireless HART standard, released in September 2007, is based directly on the HART protocol, but is free of the physical transfer path. HART uses a 2.4 GHz band %%MDASSML%% license-free and used throughout the world %%MDASSML%% as a transfer medium for several radio technologies, including wireless local area network (WLAN), Bluetooth and ZigBee. Thus it is possible to use Wireless HART without approval.

Evolution of a technology

For the physical layer, Wireless HART uses radio modules in accordance with IEEE 802.15.4. Radio systems are already established on the basis of this standard, for example ZigBee and WLAN. The advantage is that the hardware is already available. However, to simply refer to Wireless HART as WLAN is too much of a simplification.

While only point-to-point connections can be constructed with conventional WLAN, Wireless HART uses a flat mesh network, where all radio stations form a network in which every participating station serves simultaneously as a signal source and a repeater. The original transmitter sends a message to its nearest neighbor, which passes this message on until the message reaches the base station and the actual receiver. In this way, the network covers a large area.

In addition, alternative routes are set up in the initialization phase. In the event that the message cannot be transmitted on a particular path, due to an obstacle or a defective receiver, for example, the message is automatically passed on to an alternative route. In addition to the coverage of larger areas, the reliability of transmission is increased.

The network manager functions as the central component of the network. The network is organized centrally by the network manager on start up. It constructs the network, establishes the organization of the communication and determines the redundant paths. The network manager also detects newly arriving stations and integrates them into the existing network during actual operation, so that problem-free expansion is possible. During operation, the network manager monitors all the important functions of the network and all stations and applies corrections in the event of faults.

The coordination of communication in the flat mesh network is carried out via the Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) method, which synchronizes the radio stations very accurately in the 10 millisecond timing cycle. Thus the radio stations record the communication to an accuracy of 10 milliseconds. This reduces the lead and lag times during which a station must be active.

In order to avoid sources of interference and interference with other radio stations in the 2.4 GHz band, Wireless HART uses a method called Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS). Here, all 16 frequencies defined in IEEE 802 are used in parallel. Already occupied channels are entered in a “blacklist,” and no longer used for communication. The combination of the exact time synchronization in the 10 millisecond cycle by means of TDMA and the use of all 16 channels of IEEE 802.15.4 by FHSS enable the overall network to achieve 1,600 communications per second.

The safety requirements of the plant operator must not be neglected and this is provided for by coding the communication with a 128 bit code. In this way, the monitoring and falsification of communication and of the usable data is excluded.

Wireless HART is the symbiosis between the much-used and proven HART, and the radio technology already established in both the private and public sectors. In addition to the well-known HART application for device parameterization, HART has already been widely used for:

  • Monitoring of instrument and environmental values

  • Asset management and optimization

  • Preventive maintenance

  • Performance monitoring

  • Energy management.

    • The requirements of these applications in terms of availability, transmission paths and speeds are well matched by the performance capability achievable by radio technology. And the Wireless HART concept also offers a seamless integration in the existing infrastructure with simultaneous openness with respect to new structures.

      Radio technology enables better use of existing applications in process automation and the achievement of new, cost-effective applications that were not previously possible. Wireless HART provides the necessary step from proprietary solutions to an overall standard in process technology, which enables the use of radio technology without system breakdown. Wireless HART will open up new possibilities to improve quality and plant monitoring, and optimize plants and processes. It is a worthwhile contribution to the economic operation of process plants.



      <table ID = 'id3003183-0-table' CELLSPACING = '0' CELLPADDING = '2' WIDTH = '100%' BORDER = '0'><tbody ID = 'id3001513-0-tbody'><tr ID = 'id3001870-0-tr'><td ID = 'id3008825-0-td' CLASS = 'table' STYLE = 'background-color: #EEEEEE'> Author Information </td></tr><tr ID = 'id3002695-3-tr'><td ID = 'id3008831-3-td' CLASS = 'table'> Gerrit Lohmann and Robert Schosker are product managers at </td></tr></tbody></table>


No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.