On-the-job safety challenges include criminal activity

As a 1988 graduate of Virginia Tech, the recent events in Blacksburg, Va., are very much on my mind. While OSHA has taken no position on this event other than to express sincere condolences to families affected, I thought it might be appropriate to write an article on workplace violence. Workplace violence is not a new concern for OSHA.


As a 1988 graduate of Virginia Tech, the recent events in Blacksburg, Va., are very much on my mind. While OSHA has taken no position on this event other than to express sincere condolences to families affected, I thought it might be appropriate to write an article on workplace violence.

Workplace violence is not a new concern for OSHA. A search of OSHA’s standard interpretations shows results for letters as far back as 1991 on this subject. The data is clear. Workplace violence is still a serious problem.

A 2005 Bureau of Labor Statistics Survey on Workplace Violence found that nearly 5% of the 7.1 million private establishments in the United States had experienced at least one incident of workplace violence in the previous year. The most currently available data shows in 2005, there were 564 workplace homicides and 177 workplace suicides. Those numbers combined represent 14% of all workplace fatalities. Visit www.bls.gov for more information.

Many of these incidents represent random, mainly unpredictable, acts. However, some occupations, such as convenience store clerks and taxi drivers, are exposed to an increased possibility of being the victim of a violent act, sometimes due to factors inherent to the job, such as isolated work locations or late night work hours.

There are no specific federal OSHA standards for workplace violence. Enforcement issues related to workplace violence are handled under the General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, known as Section 5(a)(1). This section requires employers to provide a safe workplace for employers by keeping it free of recognized hazards.

Obviously, a random, unpredictable act would not usually be considered a “recognized hazard.” Some rare situations, however, might lead OSHA to consider the use of the General Duty Clause to cite employers for hazards associated with workplace violence. Such a decision would be entirely based upon the specific facts of the case.

Workplace violence laws

Some states do have their own workplace violence laws, such as California and New Mexico. Some of these state plan states have issued citations. Federal OSHA’s last workplace violence citation involved an organization that exposed its employees to physical violence from vagrants. Employees in this organization were required to work alone at night, in an isolated location, with no emergency communications or security. The employer was fully aware of previous attacks on employees, and they failed to provide safe working conditions.

In some cases where OSHA may not find all of the elements to support a General Duty Clause violation, they may issue what’s known as a “Section 21” letter. Section 21 of the OSH Act authorizes OSHA to train employers and employees about workplace hazards and appropriate abatement methods. These letters are issued where there is no standard, but OSHA believes significant conditions exist that should be brought to an employer’s attention. No citations are issued. Through these letters, however, OSHA attempts to educate the employer so that exposure to a hazard may be reduced or eliminated.

The letters may contain specific information or guidance relating to the particular circumstances of the employer’s worksite, and suggestions for abatement. The agency has issued several “Section 21” letters for workplace violence over the last three years.

OSHA’s Web site has information on the topic of workplace violence at www.osha.gov/SLTC/workplaceviolence/ . The pages are a clearinghouse for information on the topic, including links to sources outside of OSHA. Other agencies, such as the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, the Department of Justice, and state sites in California and Oregon have information and guidance on the subject.

The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2017 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
SCCR, 2018 Maintenance study, and VFDs in a washdown environment.
Welding ergonomics, 2017 Salary Survey, and surge protection
2017 Top Plant winner, Best practices, Plant Engineering at 70, Top 10 stories of 2017
Product of the Year winners, Pattern recognition, Engineering analytics, Revitalize older pump installations
Control room technology innovation; Practical approaches to corrosion protection; Pipeline regulator revises quality programs
The cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Setting internal automation standards
Knowing how and when to use parallel generators
PID controllers, Solar-powered SCADA, Using 80 GHz radar sensors

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me